The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Structure Sensitivity of the Electrochemical Reduction of Carbon Monoxide on Copper Single Crystals
Abstract
The product selectivity in the electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide strongly depends on the atomic configuration of the copper electrode surface. On Cu(111), methane formation is favored, whereas on Cu(100), ethylene formation is favored, with selective ethylene formation at low overpotentials. To distinguish the reactivity of (100) terraces vs (100) steps, we have studied carbon monoxide reduction on Cu(322), with the [5(111) × (100)] orientation, and Cu(911), with the [5(100) × (111)] orientation. Only on Cu(911) is the selective ethylene formation at low overpotentials observed, indicating that this reaction pathway occurs only on (100) terraces. We also show that the reduction of ethylene oxide to ethylene is significantly faster on Cu(100) compared with Cu(111), giving further evidence to the importance of the associated intermediate for ethylene formation. On Cu(110), the potential dependence of methane and ethylene formation is similar to Cu(111), and we have observed a primary alcohol among the products.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hori, Y., Kikuchi, K., & Suzuki, S. (1985) · Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1246/cl.1985.1695 · Cited by 1,401
Cited by
Progress and perspectives of electrochemical CO2 reduction on copper in aqueous electrolyte
Nitopi, S., Bertheussen, E., Scott, S. B., Liu, X., Engstfeld, A. K., Horch, S., Seger, B., Stephens, I. E. L., Chan, K., Hahn, C., et al. (2019) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00705 · Cited by 5,223
Advances and challenges in understanding the electrocatalytic conversion of carbon dioxide to fuels
Birdja, Y. Y., Pérez-Gallent, E., Figueiredo, M. C., Göttle, A. J., Calle-Vallejo, F., & Koper, M. T. M. (2019) · Nature Energy · doi:10.1038/s41560-019-0450-y · Cited by 2,747
Self-citationTuning Selectivity of CO2 Hydrogenation Reactions at the Metal/Oxide Interface
Kattel, S., Liu, P., & Chen, J. G. (2017) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.7b05362 · Cited by 1,259
CO2 Reduction: From the Electrochemical to Photochemical Approach
Wu, J., Huang, Y., Ye, W., & Li, Y. (2017) · Advanced Science · doi:10.1002/advs.201700194 · Cited by 937
Electrocatalytic reduction of CO2 and CO to multi-carbon compounds over Cu-based catalysts
Ma, W., He, X., Wang, W., Xie, S., Zhang, Q., & Wang, Y. (2021) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d1cs00535a · Cited by 721
Metadata
- Authors
- Schouten, K. J. P., Pérez Gallent, E., & Koper, M. T. M.
- Venue
- ACS Catalysis
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2013-05-14
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1292-1295
- ISSN
- 2155-5435 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2318964098
- Cited by
- 366
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.