Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 320

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

CO2 Electroreduction to Hydrocarbons on Carbon-Supported Cu Nanoparticles

Baturina, Olga A., Lu, Qin, Padilla, Monica A., Xin, Le, Li, Wenzhen, Serov, Alexey, Artyushkova, Kateryna, Atanassov, Plamen, Xu, Feng, Epshteyn, Albert, Brintlinger, Todd, Schuette, Mike, Collins, Greg E.·2014·ACS Catalysis

Abstract

Activities of Cu nanoparticles supported on carbon black (VC), single-wall carbon nanotubes (SWNTs), and Ketjen Black (KB) toward CO 2 electroreduction to hydrocarbons (CH 4, C 2 H 2, C 2 H 4, and C 2 H 6 ) are evaluated using a sealed rotating disk electrode (RDE) setup coupled to a gas chromatograph (GC). Thin films of supported Cu catalysts are deposited on RDE tips following a procedure well-established in the fuel cell community. Lead (Pb) underpotential deposition (UPD) is used to determine the electrochemical surface area (ECSA) of thin films of 40 wt % Cu/VC, 20 wt % Cu/SWNT, 50 wt % Cu/KB, and commercial 20 wt % Cu/VC catalysts on glassy carbon electrodes. Faradaic efficiencies of four carbon-supported Cu catalysts toward CO 2 electroreduction to hydrocarbons are compared to that of electrodeposited smooth Cu films. For all the catalysts studied, the only hydrocarbons detected by GC are CH 4 and C 2 H 4 . The Cu nanoparticles are found to be more active toward C 2 H 4 generation versus electrodeposited smooth copper films. For the supported Cu nanocatalysts, the ratio of C 2 H 4 /CH 4 Faradaic efficiencies is believed to be a function of particle size, as higher ratios are observed for smaller Cu nanoparticles. This is likely due to an increase in the fraction of under-coordinated sites, such as corners, edges, and defects, as the nanoparticles become smaller.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/cs500537y

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 320

Metadata

Authors
Baturina, O. A., Lu, Q., Padilla, M. A., Xin, L., Li, W., Serov, A., Artyushkova, K., Atanassov, P., Xu, F., Epshteyn, A., Brintlinger, T., Schuette, M., & Collins, G. E.
Venue
ACS Catalysis
Published
2014-09-18
Volume
4
Issue
10
Pages
3682-3695
ISSN
2155-5435 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2340417484
Cited by
320
References
2
FWCI
5.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: CO2 Electroreduction to Hydrocarbons on Carbon-Supported Cu Nanoparticles. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/cs500537y
The paper
Baturina, O. A., Lu, Q., Padilla, M. A., Xin, L., Li, W., Serov, A., Artyushkova, K., Atanassov, P., Xu, F., Epshteyn, A., Brintlinger, T., Schuette, M., & Collins, G. E. (2014). CO2 Electroreduction to Hydrocarbons on Carbon-Supported Cu Nanoparticles. ACS Catalysis. https://doi.org/10.1021/cs500537y

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.