The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Performance of Molecular Mechanics Force Fields for RNA Simulations: Stability of UUCG and GNRA Hairpins
Open accessAbstract
The RNA hairpin loops represent important RNA topologies with indispensable biological functions in RNA folding and tertiary interactions. 5′-UNCG-3′ and 5′-GNRA-3′ RNA tetraloops are the most important classes of RNA hairpin loops. Both tetraloops are highly structured with characteristic signature three-dimensional features and are recurrently seen in functional RNAs and ribonucleoprotein particles. Explicit solvent molecular dynamics (MD) simulation is a computational technique which can efficiently complement the experimental data and provide unique structural dynamics information on the atomic scale. Nevertheless, the outcome of simulations is often compromised by imperfections in the parametrization of simplified pairwise additive empirical potentials referred to also as force fields. We have pointed out in several recent studies that a force field description of single-stranded hairpin segments of nucleic acids may be particularly challenging for the force fields. In this paper, we report a critical assessment of a broad set of MD simulations of UUCG, GAGA, and GAAA tetraloops using various force fields. First, we utilized the three widely used variants of Cornell et al. (AMBER) force fields known as ff 94, ff 99, and ff 99bsc0. Some simulations were also carried out with CHARMM27. The simulations reveal several problems which show that these force fields are not able to retain all characteristic structural features (structural signature) of the studied tetraloops. Then we tested four recent reparameterizations of glycosidic torsion of the Cornell et al. force field (two of them being currently parametrized in our laboratories). We show that at least some of the new versions show an improved description of the tetraloops, mainly in the syn glycosidic torsion region of the UNCG tetraloop. The best performance is achieved in combination with the bsc0 parametrization of the α/γ angles. Another critically important region to properly describe RNA molecules is the anti /high- anti region of the glycosidic torsion, where there are significant differences among the tested force fields. The tetraloop simulations are complemented by simulations of short A-RNA stems, which are especially sensitive to an appropriate description of the anti /high- anti region. While excessive accessibility of the high- anti region converts the A-RNA into a senseless “ladder-like” geometry, excessive penalization of the high- anti region shifts the simulated structures away from typical A-RNA geometry to structures with a visibly underestimated inclination of base pairs with respect to the helical axis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD
Phillips, J. C., Braun, R., Wang, W., Gumbart, J., Tajkhorshid, E., Villa, E., Chipot, C., Skeel, R. D., Kalé, L., & Schulten, K. (2005) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.20289 · Cited by 16,914
Structural Insight into RNA Hairpin Folding Intermediates
Bowman, G. R., Huang, X., Yao, Y., Sun, J., Carlsson, G., Guibas, L. J., & Pande, V. S. (2008) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja8032857 · Cited by 101
Cited by
Structural basis for Cas9 off-target activity
Pacesa, M., Lin, C.-H., Cléry, A., Saha, A., Arantes, P. R., Bargsten, K., Irby, M. J., Allain, F. H.-T., Palermo, G., Cameron, P., et al. (2022) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2022.09.026 · Cited by 198
Palermo, G., Chen, J. S., Ricci, C. G., Rivalta, I., Jinek, M., Batista, V. S., Doudna, J. A., & McCammon, J. A. (2018) · Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics · doi:10.1017/s0033583518000070 · Cited by 123
CRISPR-Cas12a REC2–Nuc interactions drive target-strand cleavage and constrain trans cleavage
Newman, A., Saha, A., Starrs, L., Arantes, P. R., Palermo, G., & Burgio, G. (2025) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkaf988 · Cited by 14
Molecular insights into RNA recognition and gene regulation by the TRIM-NHL protein Mei-P26
Salerno-Kochan, A., Horn, A., Ghosh, P., Nithin, C., Kościelniak, A., Meindl, A., Strauss, D., Krutyhołowa, R., Rossbach, O., Bujnicki, J. M., et al. (2022) · Life Science Alliance · doi:10.26508/lsa.202201418 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Banáš, P., Hollas, D., Zgarbová, M., Jurečka, P., Orozco, M., Cheatham, T. E., Šponer, J., & Otyepka, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2010-11-09
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 3836-3849
- ISSN
- 1549-9618 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-9626
- OpenAlex
- W2324524889
- Cited by
- 373
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 8.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.