The DOI matches its Crossref record.
National Science Education Standards
Abstract
Overview of the National Science Education Standards.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
What Makes Professional Development Effective? Results From a National Sample of Teachers
Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/00028312038004915 · Cited by 5,047
Springer, L., Stanne, M. E., & Donovan, S. S. (1999) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543069001021 · Cited by 1,943
Seidel, T., & Shavelson, R. J. (2007) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654307310317 · Cited by 1,259
Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Studies of Inquiry-Based Science Teaching: A Meta-Analysis
Furtak, E. M., Seidel, T., Iverson, H., & Briggs, D. C. (2012) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654312457206 · Cited by 1,021
Kolstø, S. D. (2001) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.1011 · Cited by 805
Mentored Learning to Teach According to Standards-Based Reform: A Critical Review
Wang, J., & Odell, S. J. (2002) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543072003481 · Cited by 587
Gormally, C., Brickman, P., & Lutz, M. (2012) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.12-03-0026 · Cited by 437
Working toward a stronger conceptualization of scientific explanation for science education
Braaten, M., & Windschitl, M. (2011) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.20449 · Cited by 351
Misconceptions About Teaching English‐language Learners
Harper, C., & de Jong, E. (2004) · Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy · doi:10.1598/jaal.48.2.6 · Cited by 299
Conditions for the Effectiveness of Multiple Visual Representations in Enhancing STEM Learning
Rau, M. A. (2017) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-016-9365-3 · Cited by 281
On the evaluation of systemic science education reform: Searching for instructional sensitivity
Ruiz‐Primo, M. A., Shavelson, R. J., Hamilton, L., & Klein, S. (2002) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.10027 · Cited by 244
Learning to Feel Like a Scientist
JABER, L. Z., & HAMMER, D. (2016) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.21202 · Cited by 225
Acquisition of Physics Content Knowledge and Scientific Inquiry Skills in a Robotics Summer Camp
Williams, D. C., Ma, Y., Prejean, L., Ford, M. J., & Lai, G. (2007) · Journal of Research on Technology in Education · doi:10.1080/15391523.2007.10782505 · Cited by 218
Seeing Change in Time: Video Games to Teach about Temporal Change in Scientific Phenomena
Corredor, J., Gaydos, M., & Squire, K. (2014) · Journal of Science Education and Technology · doi:10.1007/s10956-013-9466-4 · Cited by 67
Lewis, B. F., & Collins, A. (2001) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.1020 · Cited by 51
A Proposed Taxonomy of Teaching Models in STEM Education: Robotics as an Example
Zhong, B., Liu, X., Xia, L., & Sun, W. (2022) · Sage Open · doi:10.1177/21582440221099525 · Cited by 44
Introducing Pre-university Students to Primary Scientific Literature Through Argumentation Analysis
Koeneman, M., Goedhart, M., & Ossevoort, M. (2013) · Research in Science Education · doi:10.1007/s11165-012-9341-y · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Lagowski, J. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Chemical Education
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1995-04
- Volume
- 72
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 287
- ISSN
- 0021-9584 (ISSN-L)
- 1938-1328
- OpenAlex
- W2006881691
- Cited by
- 770
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 52.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
