Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 716

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Conversion Limits in the Reaction of CO2with Lime

Abanades, J. Carlos, Alvarez, Diego·2003·Energy & Fuels
DOI 10.1021/ef020152a
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The use of calcines of natural limestones as CO 2 regenerable sorbents is investigated in this work by studying the decay of the maximum carbonation conversion during many carbonation/calcination cycles. New experimental information is complemented with a compilation of previously published data on this subject. The observed conversion limits in the reaction of CO 2 with lime are interpreted in terms of a certain loss in the porosity associated with small pores and a certain increase in the porosity associated with large pores. In the carbonation part of every cycle, the CaCO 3 fills up all the available porosity made up of small pores plus a small fraction of the large voids, limited by the thickness of the product layer that marks the onset of the slow carbonation rate. A simple model based on textural changes, observed by scanning electron microscopy, fits equally well all the data from this work and from other authors. The two model parameters are consistent with known mechanism occurring during calcination and carbonation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ef020152a

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. Herzog H., 2000, Sci. Am., 282, 79, 10.1038/scientificamerican0200-72 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Metz B., Climate Change 2001: Mitigation
  3. Lackner K., 2001, Patent WO 01/42132 A1
  4. Lin S. Y., 2002, Energy Convers. Manage., 43, 1290
  5. Squires A. M., 1967, Adv. Chem. Ser., 69, 229
  6. Curran G. P., 1967, Adv. Chem. Ser., 69, 165
  7. Silaban A., 1995, Chem. Eng. Commun ., 137, 190, 10.1080/00986449508936375 · DOI
  8. Balasubramanian B., 1999, Chem. Eng. Sci., 54, 3552, 10.1016/S0009-2509(98)00425-4 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Shimizu T., 1999, Trans. Inst.Chem. Eng., 77, 62, 10.1205/026387699525882 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Barker R., 1973, J. Appl. Chem. Biotechnol., 23, 742, 10.1002/jctb.5020231005 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Aihara M., 2001, Appl. Energ., 69, 238, 10.1016/S0306-2619(00)00072-6 · DOI
  12. Kato Y., 2001, Nucl. Eng. Des., 210, 8, 10.1016/S0029-5493(01)00421-6 · DOI
  13. Bhatia S. K., 1983, AIChE J., 29, 79, 10.1002/aic.690290111 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Mess D., 1999, Energ. Fuel, 13, 1005, 10.1021/ef980266f · DOI · Paper page
  15. Deutch Y., 1991, Termochim. Acta, 182, 89
  16. Borgwardt R. H., 1985, AIChE J., 31
  17. Fuertes A. B., 1991, Chem. Eng. Commun., 109, 88, 10.1080/00986449108910974 · doi:10.1080/00986449108910974
  18. Ulerich N. H., 1978, Thermochim. Acta, 26, 282, 10.1016/0040-6031(78)80074-4 · doi:10.1016/0040-6031(78)80074-4
  19. Ciambelli P., 1985, Fuel, 64, 820, 10.1016/0016-2361(85)90016-X · doi:10.1016/0016-2361(85)90016-x
  20. Beruto D., 1983, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 66, 896, 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1983.tb11008.x · doi:10.1111/j.1151-2916.1983.tb11008.x
  21. Borgwardt R. H., 1989, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 28, 500, 10.1021/ie00088a019 · DOI
  22. Abanades J. C., 2002, Chem. Eng. J., 90, 306, 10.1016/S1385-8947(02)00126-2 · DOI

Cited by

See all 716

Metadata

Authors
Abanades, J. C., & Alvarez, D.
Venue
Energy & Fuels
Publisher
American Chemical Society (ACS)
Published
2003-01-28
Volume
17
Issue
2
Pages
308-315
ISSN
  • 0887-0624 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5029
DOI
10.1021/ef020152a
OpenAlex
W1969347521
Cited by
716
References
0
FWCI
26.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Conversion Limits in the Reaction of CO2with Lime. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ef020152a
The paper
Abanades, J. C., & Alvarez, D. (2003). Conversion Limits in the Reaction of CO2with Lime. Energy & Fuels. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef020152a

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.