The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Carbon Dioxide Capture Using Ionic Liquid 1-Butyl-3-methylimidazolium Acetate
Abstract
Carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) capture using aqueous amine scrubbing is currently considered the most feasible option for separating CO 2 from post-combustion flue gas. Using simple absorption and stripping configurations, monoethanolamine has been commercially demonstrated to effectively scrub CO 2 from post-combustion flue gas. However, the current capital and operating costs are high and do not meet the target of the Department of Energy to remove 90% of CO 2 from post-combustion flue gas with no more than a 35% increase in the cost of electricity. The evaluation of advanced absorbents, adsorbents, and membranes is under way to find the most energy-efficient CO 2 -capture technology. We have modeled an ionic liquid that can reduce the energy losses by 16% compared to a commercial monoethanolamine process. The choice of the ionic liquid, 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium acetate, has not been optimized but was chosen based on chemical absorption behavior and the desire to understand performance. Engineering design estimates indicate that the investment for the ionic liquid process will be 11% lower than the amine-based process and provide a 12% reduction in equipment footprint. A parametric study examined four improvements in the ionic liquid technology, which may reduce even further the energy and cost required for CO 2 capture.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Carbon capture and storage (CCS): the way forward
Bui, M., Adjiman, C. S., Bardow, A., Anthony, E. J., Boston, A., Brown, S., Fennell, P. S., Fuss, S., Galindo, A., Hackett, L. A., et al. (2018) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c7ee02342a · Cited by 4,374
Carbon capture and storage update
Boot-Handford, M. E., Abanades, J. C., Anthony, E. J., Blunt, M. J., Brandani, S., Mac Dowell, N., Fernández, J. R., Ferrari, M.-C., Gross, R., Hallett, J. P., et al. (2014) · Energy Environ. Sci. · doi:10.1039/c3ee42350f · Cited by 2,386
State-of-the-Art of CO2Capture with Ionic Liquids
Ramdin, M., de Loos, T. W., & Vlugt, T. J. H. (2012) · Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · doi:10.1021/ie3003705 · Cited by 1,073
Multiscale Studies on Ionic Liquids
Dong, K., Liu, X., Dong, H., Zhang, X., & Zhang, S. (2017) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00776 · Cited by 773
Carbon Capture From Flue Gas and the Atmosphere: A Perspective
Wang, X., & Song, C. (2020) · Frontiers in Energy Research · doi:10.3389/fenrg.2020.560849 · Cited by 428
Advancements in carbon capture technologies: A review
Dubey, A., & Arora, A. (2022) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133932 · Cited by 303
Chemically Tunable Ionic Liquids with Aprotic Heterocyclic Anion (AHA) for CO2 Capture
Seo, S., Quiroz-Guzman, M., DeSilva, M. A., Lee, T. B., Huang, Y., Goodrich, B. F., Schneider, W. F., & Brennecke, J. F. (2014) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp502279w · Cited by 265
Carbon Capture Technologies: A Review on Technology Readiness Level
Hekmatmehr, H., Esmaeili, A., Pourmahdi, M., Atashrouz, S., Abedi, A., Ali Abuswer, M., Nedeljkovic, D., Latifi, M., Farag, S., & Mohaddespour, A. (2024) · Fuel · doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2024.130898 · Cited by 189
Modeling of CO2 capture ability of [Bmim][BF4] ionic liquid using connectionist smart paradigms
Daryayehsalameh, B., Nabavi, M., & Vaferi, B. (2021) · Environmental Technology & Innovation · doi:10.1016/j.eti.2021.101484 · Cited by 111
Oko, E., Zacchello, B., Wang, M., & Fethi, A. (2018) · Greenhouse Gases Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/ghg.1772 · Cited by 31
Metadata
- Authors
- Shiflett, M. B., Drew, D. W., Cantini, R. A., & Yokozeki, A.
- Venue
- Energy & Fuels
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2010-09-07
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 5781-5789
- ISSN
- 0887-0624 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5029
- OpenAlex
- W2323073093
- Cited by
- 321
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 34.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
