Cited by 198Atmospheric Ozone and ClimateRefrigeration and Air Conditioning TechnologiesAtmospheric chemistry and aerosols

The environmental impact of CFC replacements - HFCs and HCFCs

Wallington, Timothy J., Schneider, William F., Worsnop, Douglas R., Nielsen, Ole J., Sehested, Jens, Debruyn, Warren J., Shorter, Jeffrey A.·1994·Environmental Science & Technology

Abstract

ADVERTISEMENT RETURN TO ISSUEPREVArticleNEXTThe Environmental Impact of CFC Replacements HFCs and HCFCsTIMOTHY J. WALLINGTON, WILLIAM F. SCHNEIDER, DOUGLAS R. WORSNOP, OLE J. NIELSEN, JENS SEHESTED, WARREN J. DEBRUYN, and JEFFREY A. SHORTERCite this: Environ. Sci. Technol. 1994, 28, 7, 320A–326APublication Date (Print):July 1, 1994Publication History Published online30 May 2012Published inissue 1 July 1994https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/es00056a714https://doi.org/10.1021/es00056a714research-articleACS PublicationsRequest reuse permissionsArticle Views1379Altmetric-Citations95LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICSArticle Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated. Share Add toView InAdd Full Text with ReferenceAdd Description ExportRISCitationCitation and abstractCitation and referencesMore Options Share onFacebookTwitterWechatLinked InRedditEmail Other access optionsGet e-Alertsclose Get e-Alerts

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/es00056a002

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wallington, T. J., Schneider, W. F., Worsnop, D. R., Nielsen, O. J., Sehested, J., Debruyn, W. J., & Shorter, J. A.
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
1994-07-01
Volume
28
Issue
7
Pages
320A-326A
ISSN
  • 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5851
OpenAlex
W2087537123
Cited by
198
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 8
FWCI
4.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Environmental Science & Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Atmospheric Ozone and Climate
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
Keywords
CFC alternatives, hydrofluorocarbons, hydrochlorofluorocarbons, ozone depletion, stratospheric ozone, chlorofluorocarbons, refrigerants, environmental impact

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review