The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Technical, Economic, and Environmental Assessment of Amine-Based CO2 Capture Technology for Power Plant Greenhouse Gas Control
Abstract
Capture and sequestration of CO2 from fossil fuel power plants is gaining widespread interest as a potential method of controlling greenhouse gas emissions. Performance and cost models of an amine (MEA)-based CO2 absorption system for postcombustion flue gas applications have been developed and integrated with an existing power plant modeling framework that includes multipollutant control technologies for other regulated emissions. The integrated model has been applied to study the feasibility and cost of carbon capture and sequestration at both new and existing coal-burning power plants. The cost of carbon avoidance was shown to depend strongly on assumptions about the reference plant design, details of the CO2 capture system design, interactions with other pollution control systems, and method of CO2 storage. The CO2 avoidance cost for retrofit systems was found to be generally higher than for new plants, mainly because of the higher energy penalty resulting from less efficient heat integration as well as site-specific difficulties typically encountered in retrofit applications. For all cases, a small reduction in CO2 capture cost was afforded by the SO2 emission trading credits generated by amine-based capture systems. Efforts are underway to model a broader suite of carbon capture and sequestration technologies for more comprehensive assessments in the context of multipollutant environmental management.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Post-Combustion CO 2 Capture Using Solid Sorbents: A Review
Samanta, A., Zhao, A., Shimizu, G. K. H., Sarkar, P., & Gupta, R. (2012) · Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · doi:10.1021/ie200686q · Cited by 1,889
An overview of CO2 capture technologies
MacDowell, N., Florin, N., Buchard, A., Hallett, J., Galindo, A., Jackson, G., Adjiman, C. S., Williams, C. K., Shah, N., & Fennell, P. (2010) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c004106h · Cited by 1,636
Deep Eutectic Solvents: Physicochemical Properties and Gas Separation Applications
García, G., Aparicio, S., Ullah, R., & Atilhan, M. (2015) · Energy & Fuels · doi:10.1021/ef5028873 · Cited by 1,112
Sustainable porous carbons with a superior performance for CO2 capture
Sevilla, M., & Fuertes, A. B. (2011) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c0ee00784f · Cited by 1,088
Air as the renewable carbon source of the future: an overview of CO2 capture from the atmosphere
Goeppert, A., Czaun, M., Surya Prakash, G. K., & Olah, G. A. (2012) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c2ee21586a · Cited by 724
A review on solid adsorbents for carbon dioxide capture
Lee, S.-Y., & Park, S.-J. (2015) · Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.jiec.2014.09.001 · Cited by 707
Advances in principal factors influencing carbon dioxide adsorption on zeolites
Bonenfant, D., Kharoune, M., Niquette, P., Mimeault, M., & Hausler, R. (2008) · Science and Technology of Advanced Materials · doi:10.1088/1468-6996/9/1/013007 · Cited by 351
Adsorption of CO2 from flue gas by novel seaweed-based KOH-activated porous biochars
Ding, S., & Liu, Y. (2020) · Fuel · doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2019.116382 · Cited by 311
Production of biodiesel from microalgae through biological carbon capture: a review
Mondal, M., Goswami, S., Ghosh, A., Oinam, G., Tiwari, O. N., Das, P., Gayen, K., Mandal, M. K., & Halder, G. N. (2017) · 3 Biotech · doi:10.1007/s13205-017-0727-4 · Cited by 268
Activated carbons prepared from peanut shell and sunflower seed shell for high CO2 adsorption
Deng, S., Hu, B., Chen, T., Wang, B., Huang, J., Wang, Y., & Yu, G. (2015) · Adsorption · doi:10.1007/s10450-015-9655-y · Cited by 159
Zeolite screening for the separation of gas mixtures containing SO 2 , CO 2 and CO
Matito-Martos, I., Martin-Calvo, A., Gutiérrez-Sevillano, J. J., Haranczyk, M., Doblare, M., Parra, J. B., Ania, C. O., & Calero, S. (2014) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/c4cp00109e · Cited by 95
Elucidating the Molecular Mechanism of CO 2 Capture by Amino Acid Ionic Liquids
Yoon, B., & Voth, G. A. (2023) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.3c03613 · Cited by 87
Shaped natural and synthetic zeolites for CO2 capture in a wide temperature range
Cavallo, M., Dosa, M., Porcaro, N. G., Bonino, F., Piumetti, M., & Crocellà, V. (2023) · Journal of CO2 Utilization · doi:10.1016/j.jcou.2022.102335 · Cited by 77
Polyethyleneimine-loaded bimodal porous silica as low-cost and high-capacity sorbent for CO2 capture
Witoon, T. (2012) · Materials Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.1016/j.matchemphys.2012.09.014 · Cited by 62
Implications of CO 2 Sourcing on the Life-Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Costs of Algae Biofuels
Singh, U., Banerjee, S., & Hawkins, T. R. (2023) · ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering · doi:10.1021/acssuschemeng.3c02082 · Cited by 32
Liu, W., Li, Y., Zhang, S., & Fu, X. (2019) · International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control · doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2019.01.009 · Cited by 31
Metadata
- Authors
- Rao, A. B., & Rubin, E. S.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2002-09-06
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 4467-4475
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2032797438
- Cited by
- 1,838
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 26.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
