Cited by 32Algal biology and biofuel productionCarbon Dioxide Capture TechnologiesEnvironmental Impact and Sustainability

Implications of CO 2 Sourcing on the Life-Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Costs of Algae Biofuels

Open access
Singh, Udayan, Banerjee, Sudhanya, Hawkins, Troy R.·2023·ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering

Abstract

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Production of algal biomass and its conversion to biofuels are important technological platforms within the larger umbrella of CO 2 capture and utilization. This analysis incorporates a life-cycle assessment (LCA) with respect to global warming potential and techno-economic assessment (TEA) of algae biofuels, focusing on the sourcing and delivery of CO 2 . This analysis evolves past work in this area to include high-purity biogenic CO 2, industrial fossil fuel use, fossil power plants, and direct air capture, and uses a Sherwood plot approach to estimate the CO 2 capture energy penalty. We also show that allocation or displacement facilitates a more intuitive distinction between biogenic and fossil sources of carbon. Thus, the LCA better reflects the influence of coproduct handling strategies as compared to previous works. The TEA is also strongly influenced by the CO 2 concentration in the flue gas. Currently, when CO 2 is sourced from large-point sources, the price of biofuels ($4.5–6.5/GGE) may become comparable to fossil diesel. However, as DAC systems become more economical, they may deliver competitive CO 2 sources for biofuels in 2050 with a total cost of <$7/GGE. Based on the net emissions and costs, algae biofuels with CO 2 sourced from biogenic sources are consistent with a decarbonized economy as of now, with substantial potential for DAC with decreasing costs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acssuschemeng.3c02082

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The carbon balance of cyanobacterial bioproduction is sensitive to the source of CO2 supplied; waste industrial flue gas, biogenic CO2, and commercially supplied fossil-derived CO2 produce substantially different greenhouse gas outcomes, and use of fossil-derived CO2 can significantly negate the carbon benefit.

    “the carbon balance is sensitive to the source of CO2 supplied, with dedicated life-cycle assessment of algal biofuel production demonstrating that the choice between waste industrial flue gas, biogenic CO2, and commercially supplied fossil-derived CO2 produces substantially different greenhouse gas outcomes. This use of fossil-derived CO2 can significantly negate the carbon benefit [13].”

    From Cyanobacteria as a Photosynthetic Chassis for Metabolic Pathway Engineering with Heterologous Gene Expression (2026) · cites this paper as [13]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Keith D. W.; Holmes G.; St. Angelo D.; Heidel K. A Process for Capturing CO2 from the Atmosphere. Joule 2018, 2 (8), 1573– 1594. 10.1016/j.joule.2018.05.006. · DOI · Paper page
  2. Clarke L.; Wei Y.-M.; de la Vega Navarro A.; Garg A.; Hahmann A. N.; Khennas S.; Azevedo I. M.; Löschel A.; Singh A. K.; Steg L. Energy Systems. In Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change, Working Group III Contribution to the IPCC Sixth Assessment Report; Cambridge University Press, 2022.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Singh, U., Banerjee, S., & Hawkins, T. R.
Affiliations
Argonne National Laboratory (US)
Corresponding author
Hawkins, Troy R.
Venue
ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering
Published
2023-09-18
Volume
11
Issue
39
Pages
14435-14444
ISSN
2168-0485 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4386827266
Cited by
32
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8
FWCI
1.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Bioenergy Technologies Office (DE-AC02-06CH11357)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
Keywords
algal biofuels, biogenic CO2, direct air capture, global warming potential, life cycle greenhouse gas emissions, techno-economic analysis, biofuel cost, flue gas CO2 concentration, decarbonization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review