Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 190

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Characterization of Charcoal Adsorption Sites for Aromatic Compounds: Insights Drawn from Single-Solute and Bi-Solute Competitive Experiments

Sander, Michael, Pignatello, Joseph J.·2005·Environmental Science & Technology

Abstract

Charcoal, the residue of incomplete biomass burning that is found in many soils and sediments, is considered a high affinity sorbent for organic pollutants. However, little is known about the microscopic processes controlling sorption. The purpose of this study was to gain molecular-scale insight into the sorption on a charcoal of three weakly soluble aromatic compounds [benzene (BEN), toluene (TOL), and nitrobenzene (NBZ)] by conducting both single-solute and bi-solute experiments. The charcoal (420 m2 g(-1)) was produced from maple wood shavings by oxygen-limited pyrolysis at 673 K. Solute affinity for charcoal followed the order NBZ > TOL > BEN. Commonly employed sorption models did not adequately describe the single-solute isotherms. Competition in both TOL-BEN and the TOL-NBZ bi-solute systems was strong. Normalization of the isotherms for the hydrophobic driving force by using an existing free energy correlation between sorption and partitioning to an inert solvent (benzene or n-hexadecane) with a nonpolar aromatic compound calibration set resulted in a finding of enhanced sorption of NBZ relative to the coalesced BEN and TOL isotherms, indicating some specificity in the interaction of NBZ. The competitive data indicated 1:1 molar competition between BEN and TOL and between NBZ and TOL, showing conclusively that this specificity was not due to a subpopulation of sorption sites unique to NBZ. H-bonding was ruled out, as the relative affinity for the sorbent among the solutes did not change at all when increasing the solution pH from 6.5 to 11. 1H NMR experiments showed molecular complexation in chloroform between NBZ and model graphene polycyclic aromatic units (naphthalene, phenanthrene, and pyrene) which was absentfor BEN and TOL. This result, in combination with the results of a companion study (Zhu and Pignatello, Environ. Sci. Technol. (in press)), is used to support the existence of pi-pi electron donor-acceptor interactions between NBZ (electron acceptor) and the polycyclic aromatic charcoal surface (electron donor) as the cause of enhanced NBZ sorption.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/es049135l

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 190

Metadata

Authors
Sander, M., & Pignatello, J. J.
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
2005-01-25
Volume
39
Issue
6
Pages
1606-1615
ISSN
  • 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5851
OpenAlex
W2054003991
Cited by
190
References
2
FWCI
10.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.