Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 548

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Arsenate Adsorption on an Fe−Ce Bimetal Oxide Adsorbent: Role of Surface Properties

Zhang, Yu, Yang, Min, Dou, Xiao-Min, He, Hong, Wang, Dong-Sheng·2005·Environmental Science & Technology
DOI 10.1021/es050775d
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

An Fe-Ce bimetal adsorbent was investigated with X-ray powder diffraction (XRD), transmission electron micrograph (TEM), Fourier transform infrared spectra (FTIR), and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) methods for a better understanding of the effect of surface properties on arsenate (As(V)) adsorption. In the adsorption test, the bimetal oxide adsorbent showed a significantly higher As(V) adsorption capacity than the referenced Ce and Fe oxides (CeO2 and Fe3O4) prepared by the same procedure and some other arsenate adsorbents reported recently. XRD measurement of the adsorbent demonstrated that the phase of magnetite (Fe3O4) disappears gradually with the increasing dosage of Ce4+ ions until reaching a molar ratio of Ce4+ to Fe3+ and Fe2+ of 0.08:0.2:0.1 (Fe-CeO8 refers to the adsorbent prepared at this ratio), and the phase of CeO2 begins to appear following a further increase of the Ce dose. Combined with the results of TEM observation, it was assumed that a solid solution of Fe-Ce is formed following the disappearance of the magnetite phase. Occurrence of a characteristic surface hydroxyl group (MOH, metal surface hydroxyl, 1126 cm(-1)), which showed the highest band intensity in the solid solution state, was confirmed on the bimetal oxide adsorbent by FTIR. Quantificational calculation from the XPS narrow scan results of O(1s) spectra also indicated that the formation of the bimetal Fe-CeO8 was composed of more hydroxyl (30.8%) than was the formation of CeO2 and Fe3O4 (12.6% and 19.6%). The results of adsorption tests on Fe-CeO8 at differentAs(V) concentrations indicated that both the integral area of the As-O band at 836 cm(-1) and the As(V) adsorption capacity increased almost linearly with the decrease of the integral area of M-OH bands at 1126 cm(-1), proving that the adsorption of As(V) by Fe-CeO8 is mainly realized through the mechanism of quantitative ligand exchange. The atomic ratio of Fe on Fe-CeOB decreased from 20.1% to 7.7% with the increase of the As atom ratio from 0 to 16% after As(V) adsorption, suggesting that As(V) adsorption might be realized through the replacement of the M-OH group of Fe (Fe-OH) with arsenate. The well splitting of three v3 bands at As-O band (836 cm(-1)) of FTIR and the hydroxyl ratio (1.7) of Fe-CeO8 calculated from the XPS results suggested that the diprotonated monodentate complex (SOAsO(OH)2) is possibly dominant on the surface of Fe-CeO8.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/es050775d

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 548

Metadata

Authors
Zhang, Y., Yang, M., Dou, X.-M., He, H., & Wang, D.-S.
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology
Publisher
American Chemical Society (ACS)
Published
2005-08-09
Volume
39
Issue
18
Pages
7246-7253
ISSN
  • 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5851
DOI
10.1021/es050775d
OpenAlex
W2018805665
Cited by
548
References
38
FWCI
2.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.