Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 309

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Steam Reactivation of Spent CaO-Based Sorbent for Multiple CO2 Capture Cycles

Manovic, Vasilije, Anthony, Edward J.·2007·Environmental Science & Technology

Abstract

This study examines steam reactivation of sorbent to improve the reversibility of multiple CaO-CO2 capture cycles. Experiments to obtain spent sorbent were performed in a tube furnace, and reactivation was achieved using steam in a pressurized reactor. Sorbent activity for CO2 capture was then tested in a thermogravimetric analyzer (TGA), in multi-cycle carbonation tests. After reactivation the sorbent had even better characteristics for CO2 capture than that of the natural sorbent. The average carbonation degree over 10 cycles for the reactivated sorbent approached 70%, significantly higher than for the original sorbent (35-40%). This means that the same sorbent may achieve effective CO2 capture over a large number of cycles, in the absence of other phenomena such as attrition. Partially sulfated sorbents may also be reactivated, but hydration itself is also hindered by sulfation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/es0621344

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. Herzog H, 2001, Environ. Sci. Technol., 35, 148A, 10.1021/es012307j · DOI · Paper page
  2. Special Report, 2005, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
  3. Abanades J. C., 2005, Environ. Sci. Technol., 39, 2866, 10.1021/es0496221 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Anthony E. J., 2001, Prog. Energy Combust. Sci., 27, 236, 10.1016/S0360-1285(00)00021-6 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Shimizu T., 1999, Trans IChemE, 77, 68, 10.1205/026387699525882 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Salvador C., 2003, Chem. Eng. J., 96, 195, 10.1016/j.cej.2003.08.011 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Hughes R., 2004, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 18, 5539
  8. Abanades J. C., 2004, AIChE J., 50, 1622, 10.1002/aic.10132 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Ryu H., 2006, Energy Fuels, 20, 1628
  10. Li Y., 2005, Energy Fuels, 19, 1934
  11. Baker E. H, 1962, J. Chem. Soc., 70, 470
  12. Curran G. P., 1967, Adv. Chem. Ser., 69, 165
  13. Silaban A., 1995, Chem. Eng. Commun., 137, 190, 10.1080/00986449508936375 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Alvarez D., 2005, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 44, 5615, 10.1021/ie050305s · DOI · Paper page
  15. Bhatia S. K., 1983, AIChE J., 29, 86
  16. Mess D., 1999, Energy Fuels, 13, 1005, 10.1021/ef980266f · DOI · Paper page
  17. Abanades J. C, 2002, Chem. Eng. J., 90, 306, 10.1016/S1385-8947(02)00126-2 · DOI
  18. Abanades J. C., 2003, Energy Fuels, 17, 315, 10.1021/ef020152a · DOI · Paper page
  19. Gora D., 2006, Fuel, 85, 106, 10.1016/j.fuel.2005.05.024 · doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2005.05.024
  20. Laursen K., 2000, Fuel, 79, 163, 10.1016/S0016-2361(99)00147-7 · DOI
  21. Anthony E. J., 2000, Waste Manage., 20, 13, 10.1016/S0956-053X(99)00305-0 · DOI
  22. Borgwardt R. H, 1989, Chem. Eng. Sci., 44, 60, 10.1016/0009-2509(89)85232-7 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Borgwardt R. H., 1987, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 26, 1998, 10.1021/ie00070a010 · doi:10.1021/ie00070a010

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Manovic, V., & Anthony, E. J.
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
2007-01-20
Volume
41
Issue
4
Pages
1420-1425
ISSN
  • 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5851
OpenAlex
W2000233742
Cited by
309
References
0
FWCI
49.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.