Quantifying Carbon Footprint Reduction Opportunities for U.S. Households and Communities
Abstract
Carbon management is of increasing interest to individuals, households, and communities. In order to effectively assess and manage their climate impacts, individuals need information on the financial and greenhouse gas benefits of effective mitigation opportunities. We use consumption-based life cycle accounting techniques to quantify the carbon footprints of typical U.S. households in 28 cities for 6 household sizes and 12 income brackets. The model includes emissions embodied in transportation, energy, water, waste, food, goods, and services. We further quantify greenhouse gas and financial savings from 13 potential mitigation actions across all household types. The model suggests that the size and composition of carbon footprints vary dramatically between geographic regions and within regions based on basic demographic characteristics. Despite these differences, large cash-positive carbon footprint reductions are evident across all household types and locations; however, realizing this potential may require tailoring policies and programs to different population segments with very different carbon footprint profiles. The results of this model have been incorporated into an open access online carbon footprint management tool designed to enable behavior change at the household level through personalized feedback.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Data show that the size and composition of household carbon footprints varies dramatically across geographic regions and demographics.
“all the more so because data show that the size and composition of household carbon footprints varies dramatically across geographic regions and demographics [399].”
From Tackling climate change with machine learning (2023) · cites this paper as [399]
ML can predict a household's emissions in transportation, energy, water, waste, foods, goods, and services, as a function of its characteristics.
“ML can predict a household's emissions in transportation, energy, water, waste, foods, goods, and services, as a function of its characteristics [399].”
From Tackling climate change with machine learning (2023) · cites this paper as [399]
Many carbon mitigation strategies also provide cost savings to consumers.
“studies have shown that many carbon mitigation strategies also provide cost savings to consumers [399].”
From Tackling climate change with machine learning (2023) · cites this paper as [399]
Cites
Carbon Footprint of Nations: A Global, Trade-Linked Analysis
Hertwich, E. G., & Peters, G. P. (2009) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es803496a · Cited by 1,715 · see citing works
Fostering Sustainable Behavior: An Introduction to Community-Based Social Marketing
McKenzie‐Mohr, D. (1999) · Cited by 1,586 · see citing works
Household actions can provide a behavioral wedge to rapidly reduce US carbon emissions
Dietz, T., Gardner, G. T., Gilligan, J., Stern, P. C., & Vandenbergh, M. P. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0908738106 · Cited by 1,450 · see citing works
The greenness of cities: Carbon dioxide emissions and urban development
Glaeser, E. L., & Kahn, M. E. (2009) · Journal of Urban Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jue.2009.11.006 · Cited by 1,257 · see citing works
From production-based to consumption-based national emission inventories
Peters, G. P. (2008) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.10.014 · Cited by 1,175 · see citing works
Food-Miles and the Relative Climate Impacts of Food Choices in the United States
Weber, C. L., & Matthews, H. S. (2008) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es702969f · Cited by 1,150 · see citing works
Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Global Cities
Kennedy, C. A., Steinberger, J. K., Gasson, B., Hansen, Y., Hillman, T., Havránek, M., Pataki, D. E., Phdungsilp, A., Ramaswami, A., & Villalba, G. (2009) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es900213p · Cited by 736 · see citing works
Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Goods and Services: An Input-Output Approach
Hendrickson, C. T. (2006) · Cited by 645 · see citing works
Environmental assessment of passenger transportation should include infrastructure and supply chains
Chester, M. V., & Horvath, A. (2009) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/4/2/024008 · Cited by 592 · see citing works
The Importance of Carbon Footprint Estimation Boundaries
Matthews, H. S., Hendrickson, C. T., & Weber, C. L. (2008) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es703112w · Cited by 572 · see citing works
Quantifying the global and distributional aspects of American household carbon footprint
Weber, C. L., & Matthews, H. S. (2007) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.09.021 · Cited by 553 · see citing works
What psychology knows about energy conservation.
Stern, P. C. (1992) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.47.10.1224 · Cited by 486 · see citing works
A Demand-Centered, Hybrid Life-Cycle Methodology for City-Scale Greenhouse Gas Inventories
Ramaswami, A., Hillman, T., Janson, B. N., Reiner, M., & Thomas, G. (2008) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es702992q · Cited by 344 · see citing works
EDITORIAL: CARBON FOOTPRINT AND INPUT–OUTPUT ANALYSIS – AN INTRODUCTION
Wiedmann, T. (2009) · Economic Systems Research · doi:10.1080/09535310903541256 · Cited by 300 · see citing works
The impacts of household consumption and options for change
Tukker, A., Cohen, M. J., Hubacek, K., & Mont, O. (2010) · Journal of Industrial Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1530-9290.2009.00208.x · Cited by 249 · see citing works
Making Sense of the Voluntary Carbon Market: A Comparison of Carbon Offset Standards.
Kollmuss, A., Zink, H., & Polycarp, C. (2008) · Cited by 230 · see citing works
The direct and indirect energy requirement of households in the European Union
Reinders, A. H. M. E., Vringer, K., & Blok, K. (2002) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/s0301-4215(02)00019-8 · Cited by 223 · see citing works
(2004) · Forest Products Journal · Cited by 206 · see citing works
Effects of Household Consumption Patterns on CO2Requirements
Wier, M., Lenzen, M., Munksgaard, J., et al. (2001) · Economic Systems Research · doi:10.1080/09537320120070149 · Cited by 187 · see citing works
Exploring sustainable consumption : environmental policy and the social sciences
Cohen, M. J., & Murphy, J. T. (2001) · Cited by 170 · see citing works
Environmental Assessment of Freight Transportation in the U.S. (11 pp)
Horvath, A. (2006) · The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment · doi:10.1065/lca2006.02.244 · Cited by 167 · see citing works
Shrinking the Carbon Footprint of Metropolitan America
Brown, M. A., Southworth, F., & Sarzynski, A. (2008) · Cited by 161 · see citing works
Pacca, S. A., & Horvath, A. (2002) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es0155884 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
Economic Input-output Life-cycle Assessment of U.S. Residential Buildings
Ochoa, L. F., Hendrickson, C. T., & Matthews, H. S. (2002) · Journal of Infrastructure Systems · doi:10.1061/(asce)1076-0342(2002)8:4(132 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Kim, B. F., & Neff, R. (2009) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.08.017 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Life cycle analysis of a residential home in Michigan
Blanchard, S. (1998) · Deep Blue (University of Michigan) · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Energy and greenhouse gas cost of living for Australia during 1993/94
Lenzen, M. (1998) · Energy · doi:10.1016/s0360-5442(98)00020-6 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
Finkbeiner, M., & Hoffmann, R. (2006) · The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment · doi:10.1065/lca2006.05.248 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Ghertner, D. A., & Fripp, M. (2007) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.12.010 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Consumption and Industrial Ecology
Hertwich, E. G. (2005) · Journal of Industrial Ecology · doi:10.1162/1088198054084536 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Schmidt, W. (2006) · The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment · doi:10.1065/lca2006.08.267 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Suh, S. (2009) · Eco-efficiency in industry and science · doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-5737-3_32 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Life Cycle Assessment of Residential Buildings
Ochoa, L., Ries, R. J., Matthews, H. S., & Hendrickson, C. T. (2005) · ASCE Construction Research Congress (CRC) · doi:10.1061/40754(183)18 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
The Fourth Generation: New Strategies Call for New Eco‐Indicators
Simons, L., Slob, A. F. L., Holswilder, H., et al. (2001) · Environmental Quality Management · doi:10.1002/tqem.1305 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Energy and Emission Estimator: A Prototype Tool for Designing Canadian Houses
Baouendi, R., Zmeureanu, R., & Bradley, B. (2005) · Journal of Architectural Engineering · doi:10.1061/(asce)1076-0431(2005)11:2(50 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
The Ecological Economics of Consumption , edited by Lucia Reisch and Inge Röpke
Tukker, A. (2006) · Journal of Industrial Ecology · doi:10.1162/jiec.2006.10.3.200 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Jones, C., & Kammen, D. M. (2014) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es4034364 · Cited by 498 · see citing works
Self-citationGreenhouse Gas Emission Estimates of U.S. Dietary Choices and Food Loss
Heller, M. C., & Keoleian, G. A. (2015) · Journal of Industrial Ecology · doi:10.1111/jiec.12174 · Cited by 329 · see citing works
O'Rourke, D., & Lollo, N. (2015) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-102014-021224 · Cited by 200 · see citing works
Tackling climate change with machine learning
Rolnick, D., Donti, P. L., Kaack, L. H., Kochanski, K., Lacoste, A., Sankaran, K., Ross, A. S., Milojevic-Dupont, N., Jaques, N., Waldman-Brown, A., et al. (2023) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3485128 · Cited by 336 · see citing works
The Concept of City Carbon Maps: A Case Study of Melbourne, Australia
Wiedmann, T. O., Chen, G., & Barrett, J. (2016) · Journal of Industrial Ecology · doi:10.1111/jiec.12346 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
Implementing Smart Urban Metabolism in the Stockholm Royal Seaport: Smart City SRS
Shahrokni, H., Årman, L., Lazarevic, D., Nilsson, A., & Brandt, N. (2015) · Journal of Industrial Ecology · doi:10.1111/jiec.12308 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
- Authors
- Jones, C. M., & Kammen, D. M.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- Corresponding author
- Jones, Christopher M.
- Kammen, Daniel M.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2011-03-30
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 4088-4095
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2318960647
- Cited by
- 450
- References
- 36
- Citations by year
- 2026: 24 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 37 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 17
- FWCI
- 15.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Environmental Science & Technology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Environmental Education and Sustainability
- Keywords
- household carbon footprint, greenhouse gas emissions, carbon footprint reduction, financial savings, regional variation, personalized feedback, behavior change
- MeSH terms
- Climate, Environmental Monitoring, Family Characteristics, Models, Theoretical, Transportation, United States, Greenhouse Effect, Waste Management, Carbon Footprint
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review