The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Efficient Electrochemical Oxidation of Perfluorooctanoate Using a Ti/SnO2-Sb-Bi Anode
Abstract
The electrochemical decomposition of persistent perfluorooctanoate (PFOA) with a Ti/SnO2-Sb-Bi electrode was demonstrated in this study. After 2 h electrolysis, over 99% of PFOA (25 mL of 50 mg·L(-1)) was degraded with a first-order kinetic constant of 1.93 h(-1). The intermediate products including short-chain perfluorocarboxyl anions (CF3COO-, C2F5COO-, C3F7COO-, C4F9COO-, C5F11COO-, and C6F13COO-) and F- were detected in the aqueous solution. The electrochemical oxidation mechanism was revealed, that PFOA decomposition first occurred through a direct one electron transfer from the carboxyl group in PFOA to the anode at the potential of 3.37 V (vs saturated calomel electrode, SCE). After that, the PFOA radical was decarboxylated to form perfluoroheptyl radical which allowed a defluorination reaction between perfluoroheptyl radical and hydroxyl radical/O2. Electrospray ionization (ESI) mass spectrum further confirmed that the oxidation of PFOA on the Ti/SnO2-Sb-Bi electrode proceeded from the carboxyl group in PFOA rather than C-C cleavage, and the decomposition processes followed the CF2 unzipping cycle. The electrochemical technique with the Ti/SnO2-Sb-Bi electrode provided a potential method for PFOA degradation in the aqueous solution.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Reduction potentials of one-electron couples involving free radicals in aqueous solution
Wardman, P. (1989) · Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data · doi:10.1063/1.555843 · Cited by 2,123
Compound-specific, quantitative characterization of organic fluorochemicals in biological matrices
Hansen, K. J., Clemen, L. A., Ellefson, M. E., & Johnson, H. O. (2001) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es001489z · Cited by 923
Cited by
A review of emerging technologies for remediation of PFASs
Ross, I., McDonough, J., Miles, J., Storch, P., Thelakkat Kochunarayanan, P., Kalve, E., Hurst, J., S. Dasgupta, S., & Burdick, J. (2018) · Remediation Journal · doi:10.1002/rem.21553 · Cited by 606
Trojanowicz, M., Bojanowska-Czajka, A., Bartosiewicz, I., & Kulisa, K. (2018) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2017.10.153 · Cited by 550
Singh, R. K., Fernando, S., Baygi, S. F., Multari, N., Thagard, S. M., & Holsen, T. M. (2019) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.8b07031 · Cited by 467
Low-temperature mineralization of perfluorocarboxylic acids
Trang, B., Li, Y., Xue, X.-S., Ateia, M., Houk, K. N., & Dichtel, W. R. (2022) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abm8868 · Cited by 425
Physico-Chemical Processes for the Treatment of Per- And Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS): A review
Nzeribe, B. N., Crimi, M., Mededovic Thagard, S., & Holsen, T. M. (2019) · Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/10643389.2018.1542916 · Cited by 314
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhuo, Q., Deng, S., Yang, B., Huang, J., & Yu, G.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2011-03-01
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 2973-2979
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2319407062
- Cited by
- 374
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.