Cited by 106Microbial Fuel Cells and BioremediationMembrane-based Ion Separation TechniquesAnaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Hydrogen Generation in Microbial Reverse-Electrodialysis Electrolysis Cells Using a Heat-Regenerated Salt Solution

Nam, Joo-Youn, Cusick, Roland D., Kim, Younggy, Logan, Bruce E.·2012·Environmental Science & Technology

Abstract

Hydrogen gas can be electrochemically produced in microbial reverse-electrodialysis electrolysis cells (MRECs) using current derived from organic matter and salinity-gradient energy such as river water and seawater solutions. Here, it is shown that ammonium bicarbonate salts, which can be regenerated using low-temperature waste heat, can also produce sufficient voltage for hydrogen gas generation in an MREC. The maximum hydrogen production rate was 1.6 m(3) H(2)/m(3)·d, with a hydrogen yield of 3.4 mol H(2)/mol acetate at a salinity ratio of infinite. Energy recovery was 10% based on total energy applied with an energy efficiency of 22% based on the consumed energy in the reactor. The cathode overpotential was dependent on the catholyte (sodium bicarbonate) concentration, but not the salinity ratio, indicating high catholyte conductivity was essential for maximizing hydrogen production rates. The direction of the HC and LC flows (co- or counter-current) did not affect performance in terms of hydrogen gas volume, production rates, or stack voltages. These results show that the MREC can be successfully operated using ammonium bicarbonate salts that can be regenerated using conventional distillation technologies and waste heat making the MREC a useful method for hydrogen gas production from wastes.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/es300228m

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 23 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. McCutcheon J. R., 2005, Desalination, 174, 1, 10.1016/j.desal.2004.11.002 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–106 of 106

Metadata

Authors
Nam, J.-Y., Cusick, R. D., Kim, Y., & Logan, B. E.
Affiliations
Pennsylvania State University (US)
Corresponding author
Logan, Bruce E.
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
2012-04-09
Volume
46
Issue
9
Pages
5240-5246
ISSN
  • 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5851
OpenAlex
W2101213156
Cited by
105
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 5
FWCI
8.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Environmental Science & Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • King Abdullah University of Science and Technology Repository (King Abdullah University of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • King Abdullah University of Science and Technology
  • National Renewable Energy Laboratory
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Microbial Fuel Cells and Bioremediation
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Filtration and Separation › Membrane-based Ion Separation Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
Keywords
hydrogen production, waste heat recovery, salinity gradient energy, acetate oxidation, cathodic overpotential, co-current and counter-current flow, energy efficiency, distillation
MeSH terms
Bicarbonates, Bioelectric Energy Sources, Hydrogen, Sodium Bicarbonate, Salinity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review