Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 433

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Sulfidation of Silver Nanoparticles: Natural Antidote to Their Toxicity

Open access
Levard, Clement, Hotze, Ernest M., Colman, Benjamin P., Dale, Amy L., Truong, Lisa, Yang, X. Y., Bone, Audrey J., Brown, Gordon E., Tanguay, Robert L., Di Giulio, Richard T., Bernhardt, Emily S., Meyer, Joel N., Wiesner, Mark R., Lowry, Gregory V.·2013·Environmental Science & Technology

Abstract

Nanomaterials are highly dynamic in biological and environmental media. A critical need for advancing environmental health and safety research for nanomaterials is to identify physical and chemical transformations that affect the nanomaterial properties and their toxicity. Silver nanoparticles, one of the most toxic and well-studied nanomaterials, readily react with sulfide to form Ag(0)/Ag2S core-shell particles. Here, we show that sulfidation decreased silver nanoparticle toxicity to four diverse types of aquatic and terrestrial eukaryotic organisms (Danio rerio (zebrafish), Fundulus heteroclitus (killifish), Caenorhabditis elegans (nematode worm), and the aquatic plant Lemna minuta (least duckweed)). Toxicity reduction, which was dramatic in killifish and duckweed even for low extents of sulfidation (about 2 mol % S), is primarily associated with a decrease in Ag(+) concentration after sulfidation due to the lower solubility of Ag2S relative to elemental Ag (Ag(0)). These results suggest that even partial sulfidation of AgNP will decrease the toxicity of AgNPs relative to their pristine counterparts. We also show that, for a given organism, the presence of chloride in the exposure media strongly affects the toxicity results by affecting Ag speciation. These results highlight the need to consider environmental transformations of NPs in assessing their toxicity to accurately portray their potential environmental risks.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/es403527n

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 433

Metadata

Authors
Levard, C., Hotze, E. M., Colman, B. P., Dale, A. L., Truong, L., Yang, X. Y., Bone, A. J., Brown, G. E., Tanguay, R. L., Di Giulio, R. T., Bernhardt, E. S., Meyer, J. N., Wiesner, M. R., & Lowry, G. V.
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
2013-11-15
Volume
47
Issue
23
Pages
13440-13448
ISSN
  • 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5851
OpenAlex
W2096122160
Cited by
433
References
0
FWCI
15.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sulfidation of Silver Nanoparticles: Natural Antidote to Their Toxicity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/es403527n
The paper
Levard, C., Hotze, E. M., Colman, B. P., Dale, A. L., Truong, L., Yang, X. Y., Bone, A. J., Brown, G. E., Tanguay, R. L., Di Giulio, R. T., Bernhardt, E. S., Meyer, J. N., Wiesner, M. R., & Lowry, G. V. (2013). Sulfidation of Silver Nanoparticles: Natural Antidote to Their Toxicity. Environmental Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1021/es403527n

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.