Cited by 174

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Dynamic protein coronas revealed as a modulator of silver nanoparticle sulphidation in vitro

Miclăuş, Teodora, Beer, Christiane, Chevallier, Jacques, Scavenius, Carsten, Bochenkov, Vladimir E., Enghild, Jan J., Sutherland, Duncan S.·2016·Nature Communications

Abstract

Proteins adsorbing at nanoparticles have been proposed as critical toxicity mediators and are included in ongoing efforts to develop predictive tools for safety assessment. Strongly attached proteins can be isolated, identified and correlated to changes in nanoparticle state, cellular association or toxicity. Weakly attached, rapidly exchanging proteins are also present at nanoparticles, but are difficult to isolate and have hardly been examined. Here we study rapidly exchanging proteins and show for the first time that they have a strong modulatory effect on the biotransformation of silver nanoparticles. Released silver ions, known for their role in particle toxicity, are found to be trapped as silver sulphide nanocrystals within the protein corona at silver nanoparticles in serum-containing cell culture media. The strongly attached corona acts as a site for sulphidation, while the weakly attached proteins reduce nanocrystal formation in a serum-concentration-dependent manner. Sulphidation results in decreased toxicity of Ag NPs.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ncomms11770

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Silver sulphide forms close to the surface of Ag NPs. TEM image with arrows highlighting nano-Ag2S (a, scale bar 50 nm), X-rays elemental mapping of Ag (red), S (blue, with white rings marking the approximate contour of the Ag NPs) and overlaid Ag and S (b), EDS spectrum—with arrows pointing at the peaks corresponding to each element—(c) and diffraction pattern—arrow pointing at the diffraction line corresponding to monoclinic Ag2S—(d) of silver nanocubes after 7 days incubation in RPMI-1640 supplemented with 1% FBS and formation of Ag2S at the surface of the Ag NPs.
Figure 1 Silver sulphide forms close to the surface of Ag NPs. TEM image with arrows highlighting nano-Ag2S (a, scale bar 50 nm), X-rays elemental mapping of Ag (red), S (blue, with white rings marking the approximate contour of the Ag NPs) and overlaid Ag and S (b), EDS spectrum—with arrows pointing at the peaks corresponding to each element—(c) and diffraction pattern—arrow pointing at the diffraction line corresponding to monoclinic Ag2S—(d) of silver nanocubes after 7 days incubation in RPMI-1640 supplemented with 1% FBS and formation of Ag2S at the surface of the Ag NPs.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 Protein coronas modulate sulphide formation. Proposed mechanism of protein corona-modulated nano-Ag2S formation at Ag NPs, with hard corona proteins trapping Ag+ released from the nanoparticle surface and soft corona proteins transporting said ions away from the sulphide-formation centres in the long-lived corona (a); TEM images of silver nanocubes after 24 h in RPMI-1640 cell culture medium supplemented with 1% FBS (b), followed by 6 days incubation in RPMI-1640 with 0% FBS (inset cartoon showing only hard corona around Ag NPs) (c), 1% FBS (d) or 10% FBS (e; common inset cartoon showing hard and soft coronas, as well as free bulk proteins around Ag NPs); TEM images of silver nanocubes after 7 days incubation in RPMI-1640 with 0.4 mg ml−1 BSA (f) or 4 mg ml−1 BSA (g) (common inset cartoon showing hard corona and free bulk proteins around Ag NPs); Ultraviolet–visible spectra of cubic (h) and quasi-spherical (i) Ag NPs after 24 h incubation in RPMI-1640 cell culture medium supplemented with 1, 10 or 50% FBS; TEM images of silver nanocubes after 24 h in RPMI-1640 supplemented with 1% FBS (j), 10% FBS (k) and 50% FBS (l). Scale bars are 100 nm (b, j–l) or 50 nm (c–g).
Figure 2 Protein coronas modulate sulphide formation. Proposed mechanism of protein corona-modulated nano-Ag2S formation at Ag NPs, with hard corona proteins trapping Ag+ released from the nanoparticle surface and soft corona proteins transporting said ions away from the sulphide-formation centres in the long-lived corona (a); TEM images of silver nanocubes after 24 h in RPMI-1640 cell culture medium supplemented with 1% FBS (b), followed by 6 days incubation in RPMI-1640 with 0% FBS (inset cartoon showing only hard corona around Ag NPs) (c), 1% FBS (d) or 10% FBS (e; common inset cartoon showing hard and soft coronas, as well as free bulk proteins around Ag NPs); TEM images of silver nanocubes after 7 days incubation in RPMI-1640 with 0.4 mg ml−1 BSA (f) or 4 mg ml−1 BSA (g) (common inset cartoon showing hard corona and free bulk proteins around Ag NPs); Ultraviolet–visible spectra of cubic (h) and quasi-spherical (i) Ag NPs after 24 h incubation in RPMI-1640 cell culture medium supplemented with 1, 10 or 50% FBS; TEM images of silver nanocubes after 24 h in RPMI-1640 supplemented with 1% FBS (j), 10% FBS (k) and 50% FBS (l). Scale bars are 100 nm (b, j–l) or 50 nm (c–g).CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 3 Silver nanoparticle dissolution is involved in nano-Ag2S formation. Ultraviolet–visible full spectra of quasi-spherical Ag NPs (a) and quadrupole peak detail of nanocubes (b) incubated (1 day: blue or 7 days: pink) in RPMI-1640 cell culture medium supplemented with 1% FBS, with or without added extra 10% (by mass) Ag+ ions from AgNO3; EDS spectra of the supernatant obtained after centrifugation of Ag NPs incubated for 7 days in RPMI-1640 with 1% FBS, before (c) and after (d) spiking with 5 nm PVP-coated Ag NPs, with dotted red line highlighting the presence of a silver signal only in the spiked sample.
Figure 3 Silver nanoparticle dissolution is involved in nano-Ag2S formation. Ultraviolet–visible full spectra of quasi-spherical Ag NPs (a) and quadrupole peak detail of nanocubes (b) incubated (1 day: blue or 7 days: pink) in RPMI-1640 cell culture medium supplemented with 1% FBS, with or without added extra 10% (by mass) Ag+ ions from AgNO3; EDS spectra of the supernatant obtained after centrifugation of Ag NPs incubated for 7 days in RPMI-1640 with 1% FBS, before (c) and after (d) spiking with 5 nm PVP-coated Ag NPs, with dotted red line highlighting the presence of a silver signal only in the spiked sample.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 4 Sulphur sources and the Ag:S ratio influence Ag2S formation. TEM images of Ag NPs after 7 days incubation in PBS (a), PBS supplemented with 1% FBS (b) and PBS supplemented with L-cysteine and L-methionine at the same concentrations of amino acids as those found in RPMI-1640 (c) and corresponding EDS spectra (d); TEM images and corresponding EDS spectra (insets) of Ag NPs after 7 days incubation in RPMI-1640 supplemented with 1% FBS, with initial silver concentrations of 2 μg ml−1 (e), 10 μg ml−1 (f) and 100 μg ml−1 (g), with elemental mapping images provided in Supplementary Fig. 26. Scale bars are 100 nm (a–c) or 50 nm (e–g).
Figure 4 Sulphur sources and the Ag:S ratio influence Ag2S formation. TEM images of Ag NPs after 7 days incubation in PBS (a), PBS supplemented with 1% FBS (b) and PBS supplemented with L-cysteine and L-methionine at the same concentrations of amino acids as those found in RPMI-1640 (c) and corresponding EDS spectra (d); TEM images and corresponding EDS spectra (insets) of Ag NPs after 7 days incubation in RPMI-1640 supplemented with 1% FBS, with initial silver concentrations of 2 μg ml−1 (e), 10 μg ml−1 (f) and 100 μg ml−1 (g), with elemental mapping images provided in Supplementary Fig. 26. Scale bars are 100 nm (a–c) or 50 nm (e–g).CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 5 Corona-mediated sulphidation of Ag NPs impacts particle toxicity. TEM images of partially sulphidated Ag NPs after pre-incubation in RPMI-1640 with 10% FBS (a) and completely sulphidated Ag NPs after pre-incubation in RPMI-1640 with 1% FBS (b); scale bars are 50 nm; Viability of J774 murine macrophages (as measured with MTT assays) after 24 h exposure to various concentrations (2, 5, 10, 15, 25, 50 and 100 μg ml−1) of Ag+ ions (black diamonds), pristine Ag NPs (red triangles), partially sulphidated Ag NPs (blue squares) and completely sulphidated Ag NPs (orange circles); error bars are provided as standard deviation; statistically significant differences (two-tailed t-test, with all data sets showing normal distribution and similar variance values) as compared with the control are marked with **P<0.005 or ***P<0.0005 (n=6), with all the P values available in Supplementary Table 7 (c); release profiles of TNFα (d) and MIP-2 (e) after 24 h exposure of J774 macrophages to various concentrations (2, 5, 10, 15, 25, 50 and 100 μg ml−1) of pristine (red), partially sulphidated (blue) and completely sulphidated (orange) Ag NPs; the missing concentrations of TNFα and MIP-2 after exposure to pristine Ag NPs are above the measuring limit (see calibration curves in Supplementary Fig. 29).
Figure 5 Corona-mediated sulphidation of Ag NPs impacts particle toxicity. TEM images of partially sulphidated Ag NPs after pre-incubation in RPMI-1640 with 10% FBS (a) and completely sulphidated Ag NPs after pre-incubation in RPMI-1640 with 1% FBS (b); scale bars are 50 nm; Viability of J774 murine macrophages (as measured with MTT assays) after 24 h exposure to various concentrations (2, 5, 10, 15, 25, 50 and 100 μg ml−1) of Ag+ ions (black diamonds), pristine Ag NPs (red triangles), partially sulphidated Ag NPs (blue squares) and completely sulphidated Ag NPs (orange circles); error bars are provided as standard deviation; statistically significant differences (two-tailed t-test, with all data sets showing normal distribution and similar variance values) as compared with the control are marked with **P<0.005 or ***P<0.0005 (n=6), with all the P values available in Supplementary Table 7 (c); release profiles of TNFα (d) and MIP-2 (e) after 24 h exposure of J774 macrophages to various concentrations (2, 5, 10, 15, 25, 50 and 100 μg ml−1) of pristine (red), partially sulphidated (blue) and completely sulphidated (orange) Ag NPs; the missing concentrations of TNFα and MIP-2 after exposure to pristine Ag NPs are above the measuring limit (see calibration curves in Supplementary Fig. 29).CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 65

  1. Monopoli, M. P., Åberg, C., Salvati, A. & Dawson, K. A. Biomolecular coronas provide the biological identity of nanosized materials. Nat. Nanotechnol 7, 779–786 (2012). · DOI · Paper page
  2. Walczyk, D., Baldelli Bombelli, F., Monopoli, M. P., Lynch, I. & Dawson, K. A. What the cell “sees” in bionanoscience. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 5761–5768 (2010). · DOI
  3. Tenzer, S. et al. Rapid formation of plasma protein corona critically affects nanoparticle pathophysiology. Nat. Nanotechnol 8, 772–781 (2013). · DOI · Paper page
  4. Walkey, C. D. et al. Protein corona fingerprinting predicts the cellular interaction of gold and silver nanoparticles. ACS Nano 8, 2439–2455 (2014). · DOI
  5. Albanese, A. et al. Secreted biomolecules alter the biological identity and cellular interactions of nanoparticles. ACS Nano 8, 5515–5526 (2014). · DOI · Paper page
  6. Pelaz, B. et al. Interfacing engineered nanoparticles with biological systems: anticipating adverse nano-bio interactions. Small 9, 1573–1584 (2013). · DOI
  7. Docter, D. et al. The nanoparticles biomolecule corona: lessons learned – challenge accepted? Chem. Soc. Rev. 44, 6094–6121 (2015). · DOI
  8. Del Pino, P. et al. Protein corona formation around nanoparticles – from the past to the future. Mater. Horiz 1, 301–313 (2014). · DOI
  9. Röcker, C., Pötzl, M., Zhang, F., Parak, W. J. & Nienhaus, G. U. A quantitative fluorescence study of protein monolayer formation on colloidal nanoparticles. Nat. Nanotechnol 4, 577–580 (2009). · DOI
  10. Milani, S., Baldelli Bombelli, F., Pitek, A. S., Dawson, K. A. & Rädler, J. Reversible versus irreversible binding of transferrin to polystyrene nanoparticles: soft and hard corona. ACS Nano 6, 2533–2541 (2012). · DOI
  11. Fedeli, C. et al. The functional dissection of the plasma corona of SiO2-NPs spots histidine rich glycoprotein as a major player able to hamper nanoparticle capture by macrophages. Nanoscale 7, 17710–17728 (2015). · DOI
  12. Lundqvist, M. et al. Nanoparticle size and surface properties determine the protein corona with possible implications for biological impacts. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 14265–14270 (2008). · DOI · Paper page
  13. Eigenheer, R. et al. Silver nanoparticle protein corona composition compared across engineered particle properties and environmentally relevant reaction conditions. Environ. Sci. Nano 1, 238–247 (2014). · DOI
  14. Nel, A. E. et al. Understanding the biophysicochemical interactions at the nano-bio interface. Nat. Mater. 8, 543–557 (2009). · DOI · Paper page
  15. Tenzer, S. et al. Nanoparticle size is a critical physic-chemical determinant of the human blood plasma corona: a comprehensive quantitative proteomic analysis. ACS Nano 5, 7155–7167 (2011). · DOI
  16. Deng, Z. J. et al. Differential plasma protein binding to metal oxide nanoparticles. Nanotechnology 20, 455101–455109 (2009). · DOI
  17. Lesniak, A. et al. Effects of the presence or absence of a protein corona on silica nanoparticle uptake and impact on cells. ACS Nano 6, 5845–5857 (2012). · DOI · Paper page
  18. Liu, R., Jiang, W., Walkey, C. D., Chan, W. C. W. & Cohen, Y. Prediction of nanoparticles-cell association based on corona proteins and physicochemical properties. Nanoscale 7, 9664–9675 (2015). · DOI
  19. Setyawati, M. I., Tay, C. Y., Docter, D., Stauber, R. H. & Leond, D. T. Understanding and exploiting nanoparticles’ intimacy with the blood vessel and blood. Chem. Soc. Rev. 44, 8174–8199 (2015). · DOI
  20. Miclăuş, T., Bochenkov, V. E., Ogaki, R., Howard, K. A. & Sutherland, D. S. Spatial mapping and quantification of soft and hard protein coronas at silver nanocubes. Nano Lett. 14, 2086–2093 (2014). · DOI
  21. Beer, C., Foldbjerg, R., Hayashi, Y., Sutherland, D. S. & Autrup, H. Toxicity of silver nanoparticles – nanoparticle or silver ion? Toxicol. Lett. 208, 286–292 (2012). · DOI
  22. Foldbjerg, R. et al. Silver nanoparticles – wolves in sheep’s clothing? Toxicol. Res 4, 563–575 (2015). · DOI
  23. Gliga, A. R., Skoglund, S., Wallinder, I. O., Fadeel, B. & Karlsson, H. L. Size-dependent cytotoxicity of silver nanoparticles in human lung cells: the role of cellular uptake, agglomeration and Ag release. Part. Fibre. Toxicol 11, 11–27 (2014). · DOI
  24. Johnston, H. J. et al. A review of the in vivo and in vitro toxicity of silver and gold particulates: particle attributes and biological mechanism responsible for the observed toxicity. Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 40, 328–346 (2010). · DOI
  25. Henglein, A. Colloidal silver nanoparticles: photochemical preparation and interaction with O2, CCl4, and some metal ions. Chem. Mater. 10, 444–450 (1998). · DOI
  26. Lok, C.-N. et al. Silver nanoparticles: partial oxidation and antibacterial activities. J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 12, 527–534 (2007). · DOI
  27. Sotiriou, G. A., Meyer, A., Knijnenburg, J. T. N., Panke, S. & Pratsinis, S. E. Quantifying the origin of released Ag+ ions from nanosilver. Langmuir 28, 15929–15936 (2012). · DOI
  28. Liu, J. & Hurt, R. H. Ion release kinetics and particle persistence in aqueous nano-silver colloids. Environ. Sci. Technol. 44, 2169–2175 (2010). · DOI
  29. Ma, R. et al. Size-controlled dissolution of organic-coated silver nanoparticles. Environ. Sci. Technol. 46, 752–759 (2012). · DOI
  30. Liu, J., Pennell, K. G. & Hurt, R. H. Kinetics and mechanism of nanosilver oxysulfidation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 45, 7345–7353 (2011). · DOI
  31. Reinsch, B. C. et al. Sulfidation of silver nanoparticles decreases Escherichia coli growth inhibition. Environ. Sci. Technol. 46, 6992–7000 (2012). · DOI
  32. Levard, C. et al. Sulfidation of silver nanoparticles: natural antidote to their toxicity. Environ. Sci. Technol. 47, 13440–13448 (2013). · DOI
  33. Devi, G. P. et al. Sulfidation of silver nanoparticles reduces its toxicity in zebrafish. Aquat. Toxicol. 158, 149–156 (2015). · DOI
  34. Starnes, D. L. et al. Impact of sulfidation on the bioavailability and toxicity of silver nanoparticles to Caenorhabditis elegans. Environ. Pollut. 196, 239–246 (2015). · DOI
  35. Kim, B., Park, C.-S., Murayama, S. & Hochella, M. F. Jr. Discovery and characterization of silver sulfide nanoparticles in final sewage sludge products. Environ. Sci. Technol. 44, 7509–7514 (2010). · DOI
  36. Kent, R. D., Oser, J. G. & Vikesland, P. J. Controlled evaluation of silver nanoparticle sulfidation in full-scale wastewater treatment plant. Environ. Sci. Technol. 48, 8564–8572 (2014). · DOI
  37. Thalmann, B., Voegelin, A., Sinnet, B., Morgenroth, E. & Kaegi, R. Sulfidation kinetics of silver nanoparticles reacted with metal sulfides. Environ. Sci. Technol. 48, 4885–4892 (2014). · DOI
  38. Yu, S.-J., Yin, Y.-G., Chao, J.-B., Shen, M.-H. & Liu, J.-F. Highly dynamic PVP-coated silver nanoparticles in aquatic environments: chemical and morphology change induced by oxidation of Ag0 and reduction of Ag+. Environ. Sci. Technol. 48, 403–411 (2014). · DOI
  39. Liu, J., Sonshine, D. A., Shervani, S. & Hurt, R. H. Controlled release of biologically active silver from nanosilver surfaces. ACS Nano 4, 6903–6913 (2010). · DOI
  40. Gondikas, A. P. et al. Cysteine-induced modifications of zero-valent silver nanomaterials: implications for particles surface chemistry, aggregation, dissolution, and silver speciation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 46, 7037–7045 (2012). · DOI
  41. Jiang, X. et al. Fast intracellular dissolution and persistent cellular uptake of silver nanoparticles in CHO-K1 cells: implication for cytotoxicity. Nanotoxicology 9, 181–189 (2015). · DOI
  42. Wang, L. et al. Use of synchrotron radiation-analytical techniques to reveal chemical origin of silver-nanoparticle cytotoxicity. ACS Nano 9, 6532–6547 (2015). · DOI
  43. Chen, S. et al. Sulfidation of silver nanowires inside human alveolar epithelial cells: a potential detoxification mechanism. Nanoscale 5, 9839–9847 (2013). · DOI
  44. Chen, S. et al. High-resolution analytical electron microscopy reveals cell culture media-induced changes to the chemistry of silver nanowires. Environ. Sci. Technol. 47, 13813–13821 (2013). · DOI
  45. Choi, O. et al. Role of sulfide and ligand strength in controlling nanosilver toxicity. Water. Res 43, 1879–1886 (2009). · DOI
  46. Bianchini, A. et al. Evaluation of the effect of reactive sulfide on the acute toxicity of silver (I) to Daphnia magna. Part 2: toxicity results. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 21, 1294–1300 (2002). · DOI
  47. Mann, R. M., Ernste, M. J., Bell, R. A., Kramer, J. R. & Wood, C. M. Evaluation of the protective effects of reactive sulfide on the acute toxicity of silver to rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus Mykiss). Enviro. Toxicol. Chem 23, 1204–1210 (2004). · DOI
  48. Selected Powder Diffraction Data for Metals & Alloys Data Book. 1st edn. vol. 1, JCPDS International Center for Diffraction Data (1982).
  49. Cia, X., Zeng, J., Zhang, Q., Moran, C. H. & Xia, Y. Recent developments in shape-controlled synthesis of silver nanocrystals. J. Phys. Chem. C 116, 21647–21656 (2012). · DOI
  50. Wang, Y., Zheng, Y., Huang, C. Z. & Xia, Y. Synthesis of Ag nanocubes 18-32 nm in edge length: the effects of polyol on reduction kinetics, size control and reproducibility. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 1941–1951 (2013). · DOI
  51. Elechiguerra, J. L. et al. Corrosion at the nanoscale: the case of silver nanowires and nanoparticles. Chem. Mater. 17, 6042–6052 (2005). · DOI
  52. El-Khairy, L., Ueland, P. M., Refsum, H., Graham, I. M. & Vollset, S. E. Plasma total cysteine as a risk factor for vascular disease. Circulation 103, 2544–2549 (2001). · DOI
  53. Salemi, G. et al. Blood levels of homocysteine, cysteine, glutathione, folic acid, and vitamin B12 in the acute phase of atherothrombosis stroke. Neural. Sci 30, 361–364 (2009). · DOI
  54. Levard, C., Hotze, E. M., Lowry, G. V. & Brown, G. E. Jr. Environmental transformations of silver nanoparticles: Impact on stability and toxicity. Environ. Sci. Technol. 46, 6900–6914 (2012). · DOI
  55. Bopst, M., Haas, C., Car, B. & Engster, H. P. The combined inactivation of tumor necrosis factor and interleukin-6 prevents induction of the major acute phase proteins by endotoxin. Eur. J. Immunol. 28, 4130–4137 (1998). · DOI
  56. Martinez-Gutierrez, F. et al. Antibacterial activity, inflammatory response, coagulation and cytotoxicity effects of silver nanoparticles. Nanomed. Nanotechnol 8, 328–336 (2012). · DOI
  57. Park, M.V.D.Z. et al. The effect of particle size on the cytotoxicity, inflammation, developmental toxicity and genotoxicity of silver nanoparticles. Biomaterials 32, 9810–9817 (2011). · DOI
  58. Driscoll, K. E. TNFα and MIP-2 production: role in particle-induced inflammation and regulation by oxidative stress. Toxicol. Lett. 112-113, 177–184 (2000). · DOI
  59. Zhang, Q., Li, W., Wen, L.-P., Chen, J. & Xia, Y. Facile synthesis of Ag nanocubes of 30 to 70 nm in edge length with CF3COOAg as a precursor. Chem. Eur. J 16, 10234–10239 (2010). · DOI
  60. Wiley, B., Sun, Y., Mayers, B. & Xia, Y. Shape-controlled synthesis of metal nanoparticles: the case of silver. Chem. Eur. J 11, 454–463 (2005). · DOI
  61. Foldbjerg, R., Dang, D. A. & Autrup, H. Cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of silver nanoparticles in the human lung cancer cell line, A549. Arch. Toxicol. 85, 743–750 (2011). · DOI
  62. Reidy, B., Haase, A., Luch, A., Dawson, K. A. & Lynch, I. Mechanism of silver nanoparticle release, transformation and toxicity: a critical review of current knowledge and recommendations for future studies and applications. Materials 6, 2295–2350 (2013). · DOI
  63. Helmlinger, J. et al. Silver nanoparticles with different size and shape: equal cytotoxicity, but different antibacterial effects. RSC Adv 6, 18490–18501 (2016). · DOI
  64. Foldbjerg, R. et al. Global gene expression profiling of human lung epithelial cells after exposure to nanosilver. Toxicol. Sci. 130, 145–157 (2012). · DOI
  65. Jiang, X. et al. Multi-platform genotoxicity analysis of silver nanoparticles in the model cell line CHO-K1. Toxicol. Lett. 222, 55–63 (2013). · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 174

Metadata

Authors
Miclăuş, T., Beer, C., Chevallier, J., Scavenius, C., Bochenkov, V. E., Enghild, J. J., & Sutherland, D. S.
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2016-06-09
Volume
7
Issue
1
ISSN
2041-1723
Cited by
174
References
4
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dynamic protein coronas revealed as a modulator of silver nanoparticle sulphidation in vitro. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/ncomms11770
The paper
Miclăuş, T., Beer, C., Chevallier, J., Scavenius, C., Bochenkov, V. E., Enghild, J. J., & Sutherland, D. S. (2016). Dynamic protein coronas revealed as a modulator of silver nanoparticle sulphidation in vitro. Nature Communications. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms11770