The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
In Situ Chemical Oxidation of Contaminated Groundwater by Persulfate: Decomposition by Fe(III)- and Mn(IV)-Containing Oxides and Aquifer Materials
Open accessAbstract
Persulfate (S2O8(2-)) is being used increasingly for in situ chemical oxidation (ISCO) of organic contaminants in groundwater, despite an incomplete understanding of the mechanism through which it is converted into reactive species. In particular, the decomposition of persulfate by naturally occurring mineral surfaces has not been studied in detail. To gain insight into the reaction rates and mechanism of persulfate decomposition in the subsurface, and to identify possible approaches for improving its efficacy, the decomposition of persulfate was investigated in the presence of pure metal oxides, clays, and representative aquifer solids collected from field sites in the presence and absence of benzene. Under conditions typical of groundwater, Fe(III)- and Mn(IV)-oxides catalytically converted persulfate into sulfate radical (SO4(•-)) and hydroxyl radical (HO(•)) over time scales of several weeks at rates that were 2-20 times faster than those observed in metal-free systems. Amorphous ferrihydrite was the most reactive iron mineral with respect to persulfate decomposition, with reaction rates proportional to solid mass and surface area. As a result of radical chain reactions, the rate of persulfate decomposition increased by as much as 100 times when benzene concentrations exceeded 0.1 mM. Due to its relatively slow rate of decomposition in the subsurface, it can be advantageous to inject persulfate into groundwater, allowing it to migrate to zones of low hydraulic conductivity where clays, metal oxides, and contaminants will accelerate its conversion into reactive oxidants.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Pignatello, J. J., Oliveros, E., & MacKay, A. (2006) · Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/10643380500326564 · Cited by 4,133
Lee, Y., Lo, S., Kuo, J., & Hsieh, C. (2012) · Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering · doi:10.1007/s11783-011-0371-x · Cited by 85
Cited by
Zhu, S., Li, X., Kang, J., Duan, X., & Wang, S. (2019) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.8b04669 · Cited by 1,246
Fang, G., Liu, C., Gao, J., Dionysiou, D. D., & Zhou, D. (2015) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es5061512 · Cited by 887
Zhou, Z., Liu, X., Sun, K., Lin, C., Ma, J., He, M., & Ouyang, W. (2019) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2019.04.213 · Cited by 677
Ushani, U., Lu, X., Wang, J., Zhang, Z., Dai, J., Tan, Y., Wang, S., Li, W., Niu, C., Cai, T., et al. (2020) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2020.126232 · Cited by 451
Kinetics and Mechanism of Ultrasonic Activation of Persulfate: An in Situ EPR Spin Trapping Study
Wei, Z., Villamena, F. A., & Weavers, L. K. (2017) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.6b05392 · Cited by 425
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, H., Bruton, T. A., Doyle, F. M., & Sedlak, D. L.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2014-08-18
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 10330-10336
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2072187875
- Cited by
- 430
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 20.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: In Situ Chemical Oxidation of Contaminated Groundwater by Persulfate: Decomposition by Fe(III)- and Mn(IV)-Containing Oxides and Aquifer Materials. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/es502056d
- The paper
- Liu, H., Bruton, T. A., Doyle, F. M., & Sedlak, D. L. (2014). In Situ Chemical Oxidation of Contaminated Groundwater by Persulfate: Decomposition by Fe(III)- and Mn(IV)-Containing Oxides and Aquifer Materials. Environmental Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1021/es502056d
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.