Cited by 887Advanced oxidation water treatmentEnvironmental remediation with nanomaterialsAdsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal

Manipulation of Persistent Free Radicals in Biochar To Activate Persulfate for Contaminant Degradation

Fang, Guodong, Liu, Cun, Gao, Juan, Dionysiou, Dionysios D., Zhou, Dongmei·2015·Environmental Science & Technology

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of metals (Fe3+, Cu2+, Ni2+, and Zn2+) and phenolic compounds (PCs: hydroquinone, catechol, and phenol) loaded on biomass on the formation of persistent free radicals (PFRs) in biochar. It was found that metal and phenolic compound treatments not only increased the concentrations of PFRs in biochar but also changed the types of PFRs formed, which indicated that manipulating the amount of metals and PCs in biomass may be an efficient method to regulate PFRs in biochar. These results provided direct evidence to elucidate the mechanism of PFR formation in biochar. Furthermore, the catalytic ability of biochar toward persulfate activation for the degradation of contaminants was evaluated. The results indicated that biochar activates persulfate to produce sulfate radicals (SO4•-) and degraded polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) efficiently. It was found that both the concentration and type of PFRs were the dominant factors controlling the activation of persulfate by biochar and that superoxide radical anions account for 20-30% of sulfate radical generation in biochar/persulfate. This conclusion was supported by linear correlations between the concentration of PFRs consumed and the formation of SO4•- and between λ (λ=[formed sulfate radicals]/[consumed PFRs]) and g-factors. The findings of this study provide new methods to manipulate PFR concentration in biochar for the transformation of contaminants and development of new alternative activators for persulfate-based remediation of contaminated soils.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/es5061512

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Both introduction of metal contents (Ni, Cu, Zn, Fe) and phenolic compounds (hydroquinone, catechol, phenol) favour EPFRs formation in biochar.

    “Fang et al. found both the introduction of metal contents (i.e., Ni, Cu, Zn, and Fe) and phenolic compounds (i.e., hydroquinone, catechol, and phenol) favour EPFRs formation in biochar.”
  • Yield and categories of EPFRs on biochar are mainly dominated by the temperature condition corresponding to decomposition of the radical precursor.

    “Overall, the yield and categories of EPFRs on biochar are mainly dominated by the temperature condition corresponding to the decomposition of radical precursor.89,97”
  • Per molecule of •OH leads to consumption of around 12 spins of EPFRs during biochar-induced dissolved oxygen activation.

    “Subsequently, Fang et al. further confirmed the critical role of EPFRs during the generation of • OH by biochar-induced dissolved oxygen activation, and per molecule of •OH would lead to a consumption of around 12 spins of EPFRs.89”
  • Overdose of metal contents has a negative effect on density of EPFRs, and consummation of EPFRs is attributed to self-reduction reactions of metal ion centres and EPFRs.

    “The overdose of metal contents presented a negative effect on density of EPFRs, and the consummation of EPFRs was attributed to the self-reduction reactions of metal ion centres and EPFRs.”
  • Oxygen-centred radicals are the predominant species under relatively low pyrolytic temperature (300-550 C) and short residence time (1-2 h).

    “Fang et al. revealed that oxygen-centred radicals were the predominant species under relatively low pyrolytic temperature (300-550 °C) and short residence time (1-2 h).89”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fang, G., Liu, C., Gao, J., Dionysiou, D. D., & Zhou, D.
Affiliations
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • University of Cincinnati (US)
Corresponding author
Zhou, Dongmei
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
2015-04-17
Volume
49
Issue
9
Pages
5645-5653
ISSN
  • 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5851
OpenAlex
W2315405796
Cited by
887
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 51 · 2025: 74 · 2024: 99 · 2023: 106 · 2022: 126 · 2021: 132 · 2020: 114 · 2019: 85 · 2018: 50 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 2
FWCI
21.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Environmental Science & Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China (2013CB934303, 2014CB441105)
  • Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20141047)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (41401252)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Advanced oxidation water treatment
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Environmental remediation with nanomaterials
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
Keywords
persistent free radicals, biochar, persulfate activation, sulfate radicals, polychlorinated biphenyls, phenolic compounds, superoxide, free radical scavenging, soil remediation, pollutant degradation
MeSH terms
Anions, Charcoal, Environmental Pollutants, Free Radicals, Iron, Metals, Polychlorinated Biphenyls, Sulfates, Superoxides, Temperature, Time Factors, Environmental Restoration and Remediation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review