Cited by 85Carbon Dioxide Capture TechnologiesCO2 Sequestration and Geologic InteractionsIndustrial Gas Emission Control

Reducing the Cost of Ca-Based Direct Air Capture of CO2

Zeman, Frank·2014·Environmental Science & Technology

Abstract

Direct air capture, the chemical removal of CO2 directly from the atmosphere, may play a role in mitigating future climate risk or form the basis of a sustainable transportation infrastructure. The current discussion is centered on the estimated cost of the technology and its link to "overshoot" trajectories, where atmospheric CO2 levels are actively reduced later in the century. The American Physical Society (APS) published a report, later updated, estimating the cost of a one million tonne CO2 per year air capture facility constructed today that highlights several fundamental concepts of chemical air capture. These fundamentals are viewed through the lens of a chemical process that cycles between removing CO2 from the air and releasing the absorbed CO2 in concentrated form. This work builds on the APS report to investigate the effect of modifications to the air capture system based on suggestions in the report and subsequent publications. The work shows that reduced carbon electricity and plastic packing materials (for the contactor) may have significant effects on the overall price, reducing the APS estimate from $610 to $309/tCO2 avoided. Such a reduction does not challenge postcombustion capture from point sources, estimated at $80/tCO2, but does make air capture a feasible alternative for the transportation sector and a potential negative emissions technology. Furthermore, air capture represents atmospheric reductions rather than simply avoided emissions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/es502887y

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • DACCS costs have been modeled to decline well below $100 per tCO2 for example in combination with low-cost PV, batteries and heat pumps in 2050 in favorable locations.

    “DACCS cost have been modeled to decline well below $100 per tCO 2 54,55,68 for example in combination with low-cost PV, batteries and heat pumps in 2050 in favorable locations.45”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zeman, F.
Affiliations
Royal Military College of Canada (CA)
Corresponding author
Zeman, Frank
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
2014-09-10
Volume
48
Issue
19
Pages
11730-11735
ISSN
  • 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5851
OpenAlex
W2330912520
Cited by
84
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2
FWCI
3.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Environmental Science & Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Industrial Gas Emission Control
Keywords
direct air capture, CO2 capture cost, carbon dioxide removal, post-combustion CO2 capture, transport decarbonization, CO2 sequestration
MeSH terms
Air Pollution, Carbon Dioxide, Climate, Commerce, Costs and Cost Analysis, Electricity, Engineering, Fossil Fuels, Power Plants, Environmental Restoration and Remediation, Carbon Sequestration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review