The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Oxidative Destruction of Perfluorooctane Sulfonate Using Boron-Doped Diamond Film Electrodes
Abstract
This research investigated the oxidative destruction of perfluorooctane sulfonate at boron-doped diamond film electrodes. Experiments measuring oxidation rates of PFOS were performed over a range in current densities and temperatures using a rotating disk electrode (RDE) reactor and a parallel plate flow-through reactor. The oxidation of PFOS yielded sulfate, fluoride, carbon dioxide, and trace levels of trifluoroacetic acid. Reaction rates in the RDE reactor were zeroth order in PFOS concentration. Reaction rates in the flow-through reactor were mass-transfer-limited and were pseudo-first-order in PFOS concentration, with a half-life of 5.3 min at a current density of 20 mA/cm2. Eyring analysis of the zeroth order rate constants at a fixed electrode potential yielded an apparent activation energy of 4.2 kJ/mol for PFOS oxidation. Density functional theory (DFT) simulations were used to calculate activation barriers for different possible reaction mechanisms, including oxidation by hydroxyl radicals at different sites on the PFOS molecule, and direct electron transfer. A comparison of the experimentally measured apparent activation energy with those calculated using DFT indicated that the most likely rate-limiting step for PFOS oxidation was direct electron transfer.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Perfluorooctanesulfonate and related fluorochemicals in human blood from several countries
Kannan, K., Corsolini, S., Falandysz, J., Fillmann, G., Kumar, K. S., Loganathan, B. G., Mohd, M. A., Olivero, J., Wouwe, N. V., Yang, J. H., et al. (2004) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es0493446 · Cited by 1,056
Compound-specific, quantitative characterization of organic fluorochemicals in biological matrices
Hansen, K. J., Clemen, L. A., Ellefson, M. E., & Johnson, H. O. (2001) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es001489z · Cited by 923
Cited by
Trojanowicz, M., Bojanowska-Czajka, A., Bartosiewicz, I., & Kulisa, K. (2018) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2017.10.153 · Cited by 550
Rayne, S., & Forest, K. (2009) · Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A · doi:10.1080/10934520903139811 · Cited by 475
Degradation and Removal Methods for Perfluoroalkyl and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances in Water
Merino, N., Qu, Y., Deeb, R. A., Hawley, E. L., Hoffmann, M. R., & Mahendra, S. (2016) · Environmental Engineering Science · doi:10.1089/ees.2016.0233 · Cited by 349
Physico-Chemical Processes for the Treatment of Per- And Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS): A review
Nzeribe, B. N., Crimi, M., Mededovic Thagard, S., & Holsen, T. M. (2019) · Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/10643389.2018.1542916 · Cited by 314
Lu, D., Sha, S., Luo, J., Huang, Z., & Zhang Jackie, X. (2020) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121963 · Cited by 275
Metadata
- Authors
- Carter, K. E., & Farrell, J.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2008-07-02
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 6111-6115
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2062814794
- Cited by
- 260
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Oxidative Destruction of Perfluorooctane Sulfonate Using Boron-Doped Diamond Film Electrodes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/es703273s
- The paper
- Carter, K. E., & Farrell, J. (2008). Oxidative Destruction of Perfluorooctane Sulfonate Using Boron-Doped Diamond Film Electrodes. Environmental Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1021/es703273s
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.