Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 254

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Fractionation and Bioaccumulation of Perfluorooctane Sulfonate (PFOS) Isomers in a Lake Ontario Food Web

Houde, Magali, Czub, Gertje, Small, Jeff M., Backus, Sean, Wang, Xiaowa, Alaee, Mehran, Muir, Derek C.G.·2008·Environmental Science & Technology

Abstract

The environmental ubiquity of perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) is well-known. However, little is known about the environmental fate of individual PFOS isomers. In this study, we investigated the fractionation and the bioaccumulation of PFOS isomers in water, sediment and biota collected from Lake Ontario. A total of six isomers, three perfluoro-monomethyl-substituted compounds, and three perfluoro-dimethyl isomers in addition to the linear PFOS (L-PFOS) were detected in water, sediment and biota. L-PFOS represented a much higher proportion of total PFOS (sum of linear and branched) in all organisms (>88%) compared to its proportion in technical PFOS (77%). The predominance of L-PFOS suggests a reduced uptake of branched isomers, a more rapid elimination of the branched isomers and/or a selective retention of the L-PFOS. The PFOS isomer profile found in biota was very similar to sediment, even for pelagic organisms such as zooplankton, suggesting greater partitioning of L-PFOS to biota and to sediment. The bioaccumulation factor (BAF) for L-PFOS between lake trout (whole fish) and water was estimated to be 3.4 x 10(4) L/kg compared with 2.9 x 10(3) L/kg for the monomethyl-substituted group (MM-PFOS). The remarkable difference between L-PFOS and branched isomer BAFs is due to an enrichment of branched isomers in water. The trophic magnification factor of L-PFOS (4.6 +/- 1.0) was greater than MM-PFOS isomers (1.3 +/- 0.17 to 2.6 +/- 0.51), whereas dimethyl-PFOS showed no biomagnification. The results illustrate the important influence of molecular structure on the bioaccumulation of perfluoroalkyl sulfonates.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/es800906r

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. Houde M., 2006, Environ. Sci. Technol., 40, 3463, 10.1021/es052580b · DOI · Paper page
  2. Martin J. W., 2006, Environ. Sci. Technol., 40, 864, 10.1021/es051362f · DOI · Paper page
  3. Tomy G. T., 2004, Environ. Sci. Technol., 38, 758, 10.1021/es034550j · DOI · Paper page
  4. Xu L., 2004, Chem. Res. Toxicol., 17, 767, 10.1021/tx034222x · DOI · Paper page
  5. Stock N. L., 2004, Environ. Sci. Technol., 38, 991, 10.1021/es034644t · DOI · Paper page
  6. Arsenault G., 2008, Chemosphere, 70, 616, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.06.087 · DOI
  7. 3M Company,, 1999, The Science of Organic Fluorochemistry; Public Docket OPPT-2002−0043−0006
  8. 3M Company,, 2000, Sulfonated Perfluorochemicals in the Environment: Sources, Dispersion, Fate and Effects; OPPT-2002−0043−0005
  9. Vyas S. M., 2007, J. Environ. Sci. Health, Part A: Toxic/Hazard. Subst., 42, 249, 10.1080/10934520601134031 · DOI
  10. Langlois I., 2006, Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom., 20, 844, 10.1002/rcm.2383 · DOI
  11. Jones P. D., 2003, Environ. Toxicol. Chem., 22, 2639, 10.1897/02-553 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Luebker D. J., 2002, Toxicology, 176, 175, 10.1016/S0300-483X(02)00081-1 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Loveless S. E., 2006, Toxicology, 220, 203, 10.1016/j.tox.2006.01.003 · DOI · Paper page
  14. De Silva A. O., 2004, Environ. Sci. Technol., 38, 6538, 10.1021/es049296p · DOI
  15. Kärrman A., 2007, Environ. Pollut., 33, 782
  16. Benskin J. P., 2007, Anal. Chem., 79, 6455, 10.1021/ac070802d · DOI · Paper page
  17. Kiriluk R. M., 1995, Can J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 52, 2660, 10.1139/f95-855 · DOI
  18. Tomy G. T., 2004, Environ. Sci. Technol., 38, 2298, 10.1021/es034968h · DOI · Paper page
  19. Stock, N. L.Occurrence and Fate of Perfluoroalkyl Contaminants in the Abiotic Environment. PhD Thesis, University of Toronto,2006.
  20. Tomy, G.; Halldorson, T.; Tittlemier, S.Methanolic extraction of poly- and perfluorinated alkyl acids from biota, Organohalogen Compounds. Proceedings of the 25th International Symposium on Halogenated Persistent Organic Pollutants,2005;787789
  21. Riddell, N. A.; Arsenault, G. A.; Benskin, J. P. B.; Chittim, B. A.; Martin, J. W. B.; McAlees, A. A.; McCrindle, R. C.LC/ESI-MS & LC/ESI-MS/MS Analysis of Individual Branched Isomers of PFOS. Differences in Response Factors and the Impact on Quantification Data for PFOS., Organohalogen Compounds, Proceedings of the 27th International Symposium on Halogenated Persistent Organic Pollutants,2008; pp1321−1324.
  22. Fisk A. T., 2001, Environ. Sci. Technol., 35, 732, 10.1021/es001459w · DOI · Paper page
  23. Sinclair E., 2006, Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol., 50, 398, 10.1007/s00244-005-1188-z · DOI · Paper page
  24. Mills E. L., 2003, Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci, 60, 471, 10.1139/f03-033 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Gustafsson Ö., 2005, Sci. Total Environ., 342, 261, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2004.12.044 · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2004.12.044
  26. Anderson I. G., 1957, Biochem. J., 67, 323, 10.1042/bj0670323 · doi:10.1042/bj0670323
  27. Alil S. S., 1976, J. Lipid Res., 17, 21, 10.1016/S0022-2275(20)37011-5 · doi:10.1016/s0022-2275(20)37011-5
  28. Tomy G. T., 2004, Environ. Sci. Technol., 38, 6475, 10.1021/es049620g · DOI · Paper page
  29. Houde M., 2006, Environ. Sci. Technol., 40, 4138, 10.1021/es060233b · DOI · Paper page
  30. Powley C. R., 2008, Chemosphere, 70, 664, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.06.067 · DOI · Paper page
  31. De Silva A. O., 2008, Environ. Toxicol. Chem.
  32. De Silva A. O., 2008, Environ. Toxicol. Chem.

Cited by

See all 254

Metadata

Authors
Houde, M., Czub, G., Small, J. M., Backus, S., Wang, X., Alaee, M., & Muir, D. C. G.
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
2008-11-14
Volume
42
Issue
24
Pages
9397-9403
ISSN
  • 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5851
OpenAlex
W2061378060
Cited by
254
References
4
FWCI
10.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.