Cited by 847Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances researchEnvironmental Toxicology and EcotoxicologyToxic Organic Pollutants Impact

Monitoring of Perfluorinated Compounds in Aquatic Biota: An Updated Review: PFCs in Aquatic Biota

Houde, Magali, De Silva, Amila O., Muir, Derek C. G., Letcher, Robert J.·2011·Environmental Science & Technology

Abstract

The goal of this article is to summarize new biological monitoring information on perfluorinated compounds (PFCs) in aquatic ecosystems (post-2005) as a followup to our critical review published in 2006. A wider range of geographical locations (e.g., South America, Russia, Antarctica) and habitats (e.g., high-mountain lakes, deep-ocean, and offshore waters) have been investigated in recent years enabling a better understanding of the global distribution of PFCs in aquatic organisms. High concentrations of PFCs continue to be detected in invertebrates, fish, reptiles, and marine mammals worldwide. Perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) is still the predominant PFC detected (mean concentrations up to 1900 ng/g ww) in addition to important concentrations of long-chain perfluoroalkyl carboxylates (PFCAs; sum PFCAs up to 400 ng/g ww). More studies have evaluated the bioaccumulation and biomagnification of these compounds in both freshwater and marine food webs. Several reports have indicated a decrease in PFOS levels over time in contrast to PFCA concentrations that have tended to increase in tissues of aquatic organisms at many locations. The detection of precursor metabolites and isomers has become more frequently reported in environmental assessments yielding important information on the sources and distribution of these contaminants. The integration of environmental/ecological characteristics (e.g., latitude/longitude, salinity, and/or trophic status at sampling locations) and biological variables (e.g., age, gender, life cycle, migration, diet composition, growth rate, food chain length, metabolism, and elimination) are essential elements in order to adequately study the environmental fate and distribution of PFCs and should be more frequently considered in study design.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/es104326w

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In general, LC-PFASs are expected to be adsorbed to particles faster and thus removed by biofilters more efficiently relative to SC-PFASs.

    “In general, LC-PFASs are expected to be adsorbed to particles faster and thus removed by biofilters more efficiently relative to SC-PFASs.”
  • These data highlight the importance of investigating PFAS exposure and neurotoxicity in varying environmental conditions, as these factors could influence PFAS accumulation in the brain, particularly in the wake of climate change.

    “These data, which are primarily relevant to PFAS distribution in wildlife, highlight the importance of investigating PFAS exposure and neurotoxicity in varying environmental conditions, as these factors could influence PFAS accumulation in the brain, particularly in the wake of climate change (Borgå et al., 2010; Houde et al., 2011; Vidal et al., 2019).”
  • A wide range of PFASs, including fluorinated alternatives to long-chain PFASs, is present in environmental matrices, wildlife, and human tissue all over the globe.

    “PFASs are ubiquitous.”

    From Helsingør Statement on poly- and perfluorinated alkyl substances (PFASs) (2014) · cites this paper as Houde et al., 2011

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Houde, M., De Silva, A. O., Muir, D. C. G., & Letcher, R. J.
Affiliations
  • Environment and Climate Change Canada (CA)
  • Environment Canada, National Water Research Institute, 867 Lakeshore Road, Burlington, Ontario, Canada, L7R 4A6
Corresponding author
Houde, Magali
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
2011-05-04
Volume
45
Issue
19
Pages
7962-7973
ISSN
  • 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5851
OpenAlex
W2322444851
Cited by
847
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 55 · 2025: 54 · 2024: 60 · 2023: 57 · 2022: 55 · 2021: 53 · 2020: 59 · 2019: 60 · 2018: 61 · 2017: 65 · 2016: 56 · 2015: 49 · 2014: 63 · 2013: 53 · 2012: 37
FWCI
4.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Environmental Science & Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
Keywords
perfluorinated compounds, PFOS, perfluoroalkyl carboxylates, aquatic organisms, bioaccumulation, biomagnification, food webs, isomers, environmental fate, freshwater ecosystems, marine ecosystems, high-altitude lakes, deep ocean, marine mammals, fish, invertebrates, reptiles, temporal trends
MeSH terms
Animals, Environmental Monitoring, Fluorocarbons, Humans, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Water Pollution, Biota, Aquatic Organisms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review