The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Not All Salmon Are Created Equal: Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Global Salmon Farming Systems
Open accessAbstract
We present a global-scale life cycle assessment of a major food commodity, farmed salmon. Specifically, we report the cumulative energy use, biotic resource use, and greenhouse gas, acidifying, and eutrophying emissions associated with producing farmed salmon in Norway, the UK, British Columbia (Canada), and Chile, as well as a production-weighted global average. We found marked differences in the nature and quantity of material/energy resource use and associated emissions per unit production across regions. This suggests significant scope for improved environmental performance in the industry as a whole. We identify key leverage points for improving performance, most notably the critical importance of least-environmental cost feed sourcing patterns and continued improvements in feed conversion efficiency. Overall, impacts were lowest for Norwegian production in most impact categories, and highest for UK farmed salmon. Our results are of direct relevance to industry, policy makers, eco-labeling programs, and consumers seeking to further sustainability objectives in salmon aquaculture.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A review of life cycle assessment (LCA) on some food products
Roy, P., Nei, D., Orikasa, T., Xu, Q., Okadome, H., Nakamura, N., & Shiina, T. (2009) · Journal of Food Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2008.06.016 · Cited by 993
Soybean cultivation as a threat to the environment in Brazil
Fearnside, P. M. (2001) · Environmental Conservation · doi:10.1017/s0376892901000030 · Cited by 702
Cited by
Nijdam, D., Rood, T., & Westhoek, H. (2012) · Food Policy · doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2012.08.002 · Cited by 734
Utilisation of feed resources in production of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) in Norway
Ytrestøyl, T., Aas, T. S., & Åsgård, T. (2015) · Aquaculture · doi:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2015.06.023 · Cited by 502
Re-defining efficiency of feed use by livestock
Wilkinson, J. M. (2011) · Animal · doi:10.1017/s175173111100005x · Cited by 435
Energy Intensity of Agriculture and Food Systems
Pelletier, N., Audsley, E., Brodt, S., Garnett, T., Henriksson, P., Kendall, A., Kramer, K. J., Murphy, D., Nemecek, T., & Troell, M. (2011) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-081710-161014 · Cited by 339
Self-citationCampbell, I., Macleod, A., Sahlmann, C., Neves, L., Funderud, J., Øverland, M., Hughes, A. D., & Stanley, M. (2019) · Frontiers in Marine Science · doi:10.3389/fmars.2019.00107 · Cited by 328
Metadata
- Authors
- Pelletier, N., Tyedmers, P., Sonesson, U., Scholz, A., Ziegler, F., Flysjo, A., Kruse, S., Cancino, B., & Silverman, H.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2009-10-23
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 23
- Pages
- 8730-8736
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W1994251749
- Cited by
- 319
- References
- 2
- Type
- other
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.