Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 161

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Determination of an Ensemble of Structures Representing the Denatured State of the Bovine Acyl-Coenzyme A Binding Protein

Lindorff-Larsen, Kresten, Kristjansdottir, Sigridur, Teilum, Kaare, Fieber, Wolfgang, Dobson, Christopher M., Poulsen, Flemming M., Vendruscolo, Michele·2004·Journal of the American Chemical Society

Abstract

The denatured state of a protein contains important information about the determinants of the folding process. By combining site-directed spin-labeling NMR experiments and restrained computer simulations, we have determined ensembles of conformations that represent the denatured state of the bovine acyl-coenzyme A binding protein (ACBP) at three different concentrations of guanidine hydrochloride. As the experimentally determined distance information corresponds to weighted averages over a broad ensemble of structures, we applied the experimental restraints to a system of noninteracting replicas of the protein by using a Monte Carlo sampling scheme. This procedure permits us to sample ensembles of conformations that are compatible with the experimental data and thus to obtain information regarding the distribution of structures in the denatured state. Our results show that the denatured state of ACBP is highly heterogeneous. The high sensitivity of the computational method that we present, however, enabled us to identify long-range interactions between two regions, located near the N- and C-termini, that include both native and non-native elements. The preferential formation of these contacts suggests that the sequence-dependent patterns of helical propensity and hydrophobicity are important determinants of the structure in the denatured state of ACBP.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ja039250g

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 68

  1. Dunker A. K., 2000, J. Genome Inf., 11, 171
  2. Uversky V. N., 2002, Protein Sci., 11, 756, 10.1110/ps.4210102 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Shortle D., 1996, FASEB J., 10, 34, 10.1096/fasebj.10.1.8566543 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Robic S., 2003, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 100, 11349, 10.1073/pnas.1635051100 · doi:10.1073/pnas.1635051100
  5. van Gunsteren W. F., 2001, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 40, 355, 10.1002/1521-3773(20010119)40:2<355::AID-ANIE355>3.0.CO;2-R · doi:10.1002/1521-3773(20010119)40:2<355::aid-anie355>3.0.co;2-r
  6. Daggett V., 2003, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., 4, 502, 10.1038/nrm1126 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Chiti F., 2000, EMBO J., 19, 1449, 10.1093/emboj/19.7.1441 · doi:10.1093/emboj/19.7.1441
  8. Millet I. S., 2002, Adv. Protein Chem., 62, 262
  9. Shortle D. R., 1996, Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 6, 30, 10.1016/S0959-440X(96)80091-1 · doi:10.1016/s0959-440x(96)80091-1
  10. Smith L. J., 1996, Fold. Des., 1, R106, 10.1016/S1359-0278(96)00046-6 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Barbar E., 1999, Biopolymers, 51, 207, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0282(1999)51:3<191::AID-BIP3>3.0.CO;2-B · DOI
  12. Fiebig K. M., 1996, J. Phys. Chem., 100, 2666, 10.1021/jp952747v · doi:10.1021/jp952747v
  13. Schwalbe H., 1997, Biochemistry, 36, 8991, 10.1021/bi970049q · DOI · Paper page
  14. Zhang O., 1997, J. Mol. Biol., 272, 20
  15. Blanco F. J., 1998, J. Mol. Biol., 284, 1164, 10.1006/jmbi.1998.2229 · DOI
  16. Mok Y. K., 1999, J. Mol. Biol., 289, 638
  17. Kortemme T., 2000, J. Mol. Biol., 297, 1229, 10.1006/jmbi.2000.3618 · DOI
  18. Gillespie J. R., 1997, J. Mol. Biol., 268, 169
  19. Teilum K., 2002, J. Mol. Biol., 324, 357, 10.1016/S0022-2836(02)01039-2 · DOI
  20. Lietzow M. A., 2002, J. Mol. Biol., 322, 662, 10.1016/S0022-2836(02)00847-1 · DOI
  21. Shortle D., 2001, Science, 293, 489, 10.1126/science.1060438 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Klein-Seetharaman J., 2002, Science, 295, 1722, 10.1126/science.1067680 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Choy W. Y., 2003, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 125, 1758
  24. Gillespie J. R., 1997, J. Mol. Biol., 268, 184
  25. Choy W. Y., 2001, J. Mol. Biol., 308, 1032
  26. Kim Y., 1989, Biochemistry, 28, 8797
  27. Ulyanov N. B., 1995, Biophys. J., 68, 24, 10.1016/S0006-3495(95)80181-5 · doi:10.1016/s0006-3495(95)80181-5
  28. Lukin J. A., 2003, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 100, 520, 10.1073/pnas.232715799 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Torda A. E., 1989, Chem. Phys. Lett., 157, 294, 10.1016/0009-2614(89)87249-5 · DOI
  30. Torda A. E., 1990, J. Mol. Biol., 214, 235, 10.1016/0022-2836(90)90157-H · DOI · Paper page
  31. Torda A. E., 1991, Computational Aspects of the Study of Biological Macromolecules by Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
  32. Gros P., 1990, J. Science, 249, 1152
  33. Pearlman D. A., 1991, J. Mol. Biol., 220, 479, 10.1016/0022-2836(91)90024-Z · doi:10.1016/0022-2836(91)90024-z
  34. Burling F. T., 1994, Isr. J. Chem., 34, 175, 10.1002/ijch.199400022 · DOI
  35. Scheek R. M., 1991, Computational aspects of the Study of Biological Macromolecules by Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
  36. Bonvin A. M. J. J., 1993, Proteins, 15, 400
  37. Kemmink J., 1993, J. Mol. Biol., 230, 322, 10.1006/jmbi.1993.1144 · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1993.1144
  38. Bonvin A. M. J. J., 1995, J. Mol. Biol., 250, 93
  39. Görler A., 2000, J. Biomol. NMR, 16, 164, 10.1023/A:1008386726542 · doi:10.1023/a:1008386726542
  40. Kuriyan J., 1991, Proteins, 10, 58, 10.1002/prot.340100407 · DOI
  41. Burling F. T., 1996, Science, 271, 77, 10.1126/science.271.5245.72 · DOI · Paper page
  42. Kragelund B. B., 1999, Nat. Struct. Biol., 6, 601, 10.1038/10640 · DOI
  43. Teilum K., 2000, J. Mol. Biol., 301, 1314, 10.1006/jmbi.2000.4003 · DOI
  44. Teilum K., 2002, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 99, 9812, 10.1073/pnas.152321499 · DOI
  45. Thomsen J. K., 2002, J. Mol. Biol., 318, 814, 10.1016/S0022-2836(02)00159-6 · doi:10.1016/s0022-2836(02)00159-6
  46. Jones J. A., 1997, J. Biomol. NMR, 10, 203, 10.1023/A:1018304117895 · DOI · Paper page
  47. Wilkins D. K., 1999, J. Biochemistry, 38, 16431, 10.1021/bi991765q · DOI · Paper page
  48. Vendruscolo M., 2001, Nature, 409, 645, 10.1038/35054591 · DOI · Paper page
  49. Davis R., 2002, J. Chem. Phys., 117, 9517
  50. Battiste J. L., 2000, Biochemistry, 39, 5365, 10.1021/bi000060h · DOI · Paper page
  51. Metropolis N., 1953, J. Chem. Phys., 21, 1092, 10.1063/1.1699114 · DOI · Paper page
  52. Holm L., 1991, J. Mol. Biol., 218, 194, 10.1016/0022-2836(91)90883-8 · DOI · Paper page
  53. Brooks B. R., 1983, J. Comput. Chem., 4, 217, 10.1002/jcc.540040211 · DOI · Paper page
  54. Lazaridis T., 1999, Proteins, 35, 152, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0134(19990501)35:2<133::AID-PROT1>3.0.CO;2-N · DOI · Paper page
  55. Paci E., 2002, J. Mol. Biol., 324, 163, 10.1016/S0022-2836(02)00944-0 · DOI
  56. de la Torre J. G., 2000, Biophys. J., 78, 730
  57. Freund S. M., 1996, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 93, 10603, 10.1073/pnas.93.20.10600 · DOI
  58. Arcus V. L., 1995, J. Mol. Biol., 254, 321, 10.1006/jmbi.1995.0618 · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1995.0618
  59. Mayor U., 2003, Nature, 421, 867, 10.1038/nature01428 · DOI · Paper page
  60. Zhang O., 1997, Biochemistry, 36, 3970
  61. Myers J. K., 1995, Protein Sci., 4, 2148, 10.1002/pro.5560041020 · DOI · Paper page
  62. Gaponenko V., 2000, Proteins, 9, 309
  63. Donaldson L. W., 2001, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 123, 9847, 10.1021/ja011241p · DOI · Paper page
  64. Cantor C. R., Biophysical Chemistry, 1980
  65. Choy W. Y., 2002, J. Mol. Biol., 316, 112
  66. Feldman H. J., 2000, Proteins, 39, 131, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0134(20000501)39:2<112::AID-PROT2>3.0.CO;2-B · DOI
  67. Wong K. B., 2000, J. Mol. Biol., 296, 1282
  68. Esnouf R. M., 1997, J. Mol. Graphics Modell., 15, 134, 10.1016/S1093-3263(97)00021-1 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 161

Metadata

Authors
Lindorff-Larsen, K., Kristjansdottir, S., Teilum, K., Fieber, W., Dobson, C. M., Poulsen, F. M., & Vendruscolo, M.
Venue
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Published
2004-02-20
Volume
126
Issue
10
Pages
3291-3299
ISSN
  • 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5126
OpenAlex
W2074586183
Cited by
161
References
3
FWCI
4.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.