The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Rapid Purification and Size Separation of Gold Nanoparticles via Diafiltration
Abstract
Purification and size-based separation of nanoparticles remain significant challenges in the preparation of well-defined materials for fundamental studies and applications. Diafiltration shows considerable potential for the efficient and convenient purification and size separation of water-soluble nanoparticles, allowing for the removal of small-molecule impurities and for the isolation of small nanoparticles from larger nanostructures in a single process. Herein, we report studies aimed at assessing the suitability of diafiltration for (i) the purification of water-soluble thiol-stabilized 3-nm gold nanoparticles, (ii) the separation of a bimodal distribution of nanoparticles into the corresponding fractions, and (iii) the separation of a polydisperse sample into fractions of differing mean core diameter. NMR, thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurements demonstrate that diafiltration produces nanoparticles with a much higher degree of purity than is possible by dialysis or a combination of solvent washes, chromatography, and ultracentrifugation. UV-visible spectroscopic and transmission electron microscopic (TEM) analyses show that diafiltration offers the ability to separate nanoparticles of disparate core size. These results demonstrate the applicability of diafiltration for the rapid and green preparation of high-purity gold nanoparticle samples and the size separation of heterogeneous nanoparticle samples. They also suggest the development of novel diafiltration membranes specifically suited to high-resolution nanoparticle size separation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Nanoadsorbents: Classification, Preparation, and Applications (with Emphasis on Aqueous Media)
Khajeh, M., Laurent, S., & Dastafkan, K. (2013) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr400086v · Cited by 528
Amendola, V., & Meneghetti, M. (2007) · Journal of Materials Chemistry · doi:10.1039/b709621f · Cited by 150
Bärsch, N., Jakobi, J., Weiler, S., & Barcikowski, S. (2009) · Nanotechnology · doi:10.1088/0957-4484/20/44/445603 · Cited by 122
Nanoadsorbents for wastewater treatment: next generation biotechnological solution
Ali, M. E., Hoque, M. E., Safdar Hossain, S. K., & Biswas, M. C. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology · doi:10.1007/s13762-020-02755-4 · Cited by 120
Density gradient ultracentrifugation for colloidal nanostructures separation and investigation
Li, P., Kumar, A., Ma, J., Kuang, Y., Luo, L., & Sun, X. (2018) · Science Bulletin · doi:10.1016/j.scib.2018.04.014 · Cited by 67
Metadata
- Authors
- Sweeney, S. F., Woehrle, G. H., & Hutchison, J. E.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2006-02-18
- Volume
- 128
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 3190-3197
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W1966748230
- Cited by
- 336
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.