Cited by 160Olfactory and Sensory Function StudiesReceptor Mechanisms and SignalingBiochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques

Probability model for molecular recognition in biological receptor repertoires: significance to the olfactory system.

Open access
Lancet, D, Sadovsky, E, Seidemann, E·1993·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

A generalized phenomenological model is presented for stereospecific recognition between biological receptors and their ligands. We ask what is the distribution of binding constants psi(K) between an arbitrary ligand and members of a large receptor repertoire, such as immunoglobulins or olfactory receptors. For binding surfaces with B potential subsite and S different types of subsite configurations, the number of successful elementary interactions obeys a binomial distribution. The discrete probability function psi(K) is then derived with assumptions on alpha, the free energy contribution per elementary interaction. The functional form of psi(K) may be universal, although the parameter values could vary for different ligand types. An estimate of the parameter values of psi(K) for iodovanillin, an analog of odorants and immunological haptens, is obtained by equilibrium dialysis experiments with nonimmune antibodies. Based on a simple relationship, predicted by the model, between the size of a receptor repertoire and its average maximal affinity toward an arbitrary ligand, the size of the olfactory receptor repertoire (Nolf) is calculated as 300-1000, in very good agreement with recent molecular biological studies. A very similar estimate, Nolf = 500, is independently derived by relating a theoretical distribution of maxima for psi(K) with published human olfactory threshold variations. The present model also has implications to the question of olfactory coding and to the analysis of specific anosmias, genetic deficits in perceiving particular odorants. More generally, the proposed model provides a better understanding of ligand specificity in biological receptors and could help in understanding their evolution.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.90.8.3715

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The receptor affinity distribution (RAD) inferred via string matching is broadly applicable to the immune and olfactory systems and portrays a Poisson distribution, approximated by a lognormal distribution in GARD applications.

    “Along these lines, we have inferred a receptor affinity distribution (RAD) broadly applicable to the immune and olfactory systems via a close analogue of string matching [65,79]. This portrayed a Poisson distribution, which in GARD applications [54] was approximated by a lognormal distribution [80].”
  • Stronger and more selective interactions come via a relationship between affinity and selectivity known to exist in ligand-target interactions in general.

    “Along with that, come stronger and more selective interactions, via a relationship between affinity and selectivity known to exist in ligand–target interactions in general [65,226].”

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lancet, D., Sadovsky, E., & Seidemann, E.
Affiliations
Weizmann Institute of Science (IL)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
1993-04-15
Volume
90
Issue
8
Pages
3715-3719
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W1975934174
Cited by
160
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 10
FWCI
1.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques
Keywords
molecular recognition, ligand-receptor interactions, olfactory receptors, immunoglobulins, binomial distribution, aroma compounds, odor threshold, odor coding, anosmia, receptor evolution
MeSH terms
Animals, Benzaldehydes, Cattle, Humans, Immunoglobulins, Iodine Radioisotopes, Kinetics, Mathematics, Models, Biological, Probability, Sensory Receptor Cells, Sensory Thresholds, Smell, Thermodynamics, Models, Statistical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review