The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
New Type of Membrane Material for Water Desalination Based on a Cross-Linked Bicontinuous Cubic Lyotropic Liquid Crystal Assembly
Abstract
A polymeric membrane material for efficient water desalination based on a cross-linked type I bicontinuous cubic (Q I ) lyotropic liquid crystal (LLC) assembly is described. This ordered, nanoporous, polymer material is formed by the self-assembly of a cross-linkable gemini amphiphile in water and contains interpenetrating organic networks separated from one another by a continuous, ultrathin water layer surface (ca. 0.75 nm gap spacing) with overall cubic symmetry. Supported membranes of this material are produced by hot-pressing the initial LLC monomer gel at high pressure through a commercial microporous hydrophilic membrane support at 70 °C and then radically photocross-linking the infused Q I monomer phase. In stirred dead-end water filtration tests, the resulting 40-μm thick, optically transparent, supported LLC membranes exhibit 95−99.9% rejection of dissolved salt ions, neutral molecules and macromolecules, and molecular ions in the 0.64−1.2 nm size range in a single pass. This rejection performance is slightly better than that of a commercial reverse osmosis (RO) membrane for the same solutes under the same test conditions, and significantly better than that of a commercial porous nanofiltration membrane. The LLC polymer material also exhibits a thickness- and pressure-normalized water permeability that is similar to or just slightly lower than the dense active layer materials used in current RO membranes. It is believed that the 3-D interconnected water manifold system in the cross-linked Q I -phase material allows small water molecules (0.27 nm kinetic diameter) to pass through with good efficiency, while effectively rejecting dissolved solutes close in size to, or larger than, the about 0.75 nm water layer gap spacing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Phenomenological Theory of Ion Solvation. Effective Radii of Hydrated Ions
Nightingale, E. R. (1959) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/j150579a011 · Cited by 3,505
Cited by
Liu, Y., Ai, K., & Lu, L. (2014) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr400407a · Cited by 4,794
Sustainable technologies for water purification from heavy metals: review and analysis
Bolisetty, S., Peydayesh, M., & Mezzenga, R. (2019) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c8cs00493e · Cited by 1,504
MOF-Polymer Hybrid Materials: From Simple Composites to Tailored Architectures
Kalaj, M., Bentz, K. C., Ayala, S., Palomba, J. M., Barcus, K. S., Katayama, Y., & Cohen, S. M. (2020) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00575 · Cited by 906
Liu, X., Demir, N. K., Wu, Z., & Li, K. (2015) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.5b02276 · Cited by 802
A Review of Removal of Pollutants from Water/Wastewater Using Different Types of Nanomaterials
Amin, M. T., Alazba, A. A., & Manzoor, U. (2014) · Advances in Materials Science and Engineering · doi:10.1155/2014/825910 · Cited by 645
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhou, M., Nemade, P. R., Lu, X., Zeng, X., Hatakeyama, E. S., Noble, R. D., & Gin, D. L.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2007-07-18
- Volume
- 129
- Issue
- 31
- Pages
- 9574-9575
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2045161346
- Cited by
- 258
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.