Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 352

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Fluorous Metal−Organic Frameworks for High-Density Gas Adsorption

Yang, Chi, Wang, Xiaoping, Omary, Mohammad A.·2007·Journal of the American Chemical Society

Abstract

A fluorous metal−organic framework, FMOF-1, is obtained by reaction of Ag(I) with 3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)-1,2,4-triazolate, giving rise to a neutral, hydrogen-free, extended 3D nanotubular porous framework consisting of tetranuclear clusters [Ag 4 Tz 6 ] connected by three-coordinate Ag(I) centers. The fluoro-lined channels and cavities of the framework show hysteretic adsorption of H 2 with a volumetric capacity of 41 kg/m 3 at 77 K and 64 bar. The framework also exhibits very high adsorptions for O 2 and N 2 with volumetric uptake of ∼550 and 400 kg/m 3 at 77 K even at very low pressures (<10 -2 bar).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ja0775265

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Yang, C., Wang, X., & Omary, M. A.
Venue
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Published
2007-11-23
Volume
129
Issue
50
Pages
15454-15455
ISSN
  • 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5126
OpenAlex
W2058877670
Cited by
352
References
0
FWCI
16.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.