The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Magnetic Glyco-Nanoparticles: A Tool To Detect, Differentiate, and Unlock the Glyco-Codes of Cancer via Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Abstract
Within cancer, there is a large wealth of diversity, complexity, and information that nature has engineered rendering it challenging to identify reliable detection methods. Therefore, the development of simple and effective techniques to delineate the fine characteristics of cancer cells can have great potential impacts on cancer diagnosis and treatment. Herein, we report a magnetic glyco-nanoparticle (MGNP) based nanosensor system bearing carbohydrates as the ligands, not only to detect and differentiate cancer cells but also to quantitatively profile their carbohydrate binding abilities by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Using an array of MGNPs, a range of cells including closely related isogenic tumor cells, cells with different metastatic potential and malignant vs normal cells can be readily distinguished based on their respective "MRI signatures". Furthermore, the information obtained from such studies helped guide the establishment of strongly binding MGNPs as antiadhesive agents against tumors. As the interactions between glyco-conjugates and endogenous lectins present on cancer cell surface are crucial for cancer development and metastasis, the ability to characterize and unlock the glyco-code of individual cell lines can facilitate both the understanding of the roles of carbohydrates as well as the expansion of diagnostic and therapeutic tools for cancer.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cancer nanotechnology: opportunities and challenges
Ferrari, M. (2005) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc1566 · Cited by 4,558
Wang, Y.-X. J., Hussain, S. M., & Krestin, G. P. (2001) · European Radiology · doi:10.1007/s003300100908 · Cited by 1,381
ErbB receptors and signaling pathways in cancer
Hynes, N. E., & MacDonald, G. (2009) · Current Opinion in Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ceb.2008.12.010 · Cited by 956
Clinical applications of magnetic nanoparticles for hyperthermia
Thiesen, B., & Jordan, A. (2008) · International Journal of Hyperthermia · doi:10.1080/02656730802104757 · Cited by 829
Cited by
Biological applications of magnetic nanoparticles
Colombo, M., Carregal-Romero, S., Casula, M. F., Gutiérrez, L., Morales, M. P., Böhm, I. B., Heverhagen, J. T., Prosperi, D., & Parak, W. J. (2012) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c2cs15337h · Cited by 1,315
Self-citationApplications and potential toxicity of magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles
Liu, G., Gao, J., Ai, H., & Chen, X. (2013) · Small · doi:10.1002/smll.201201531 · Cited by 570
Oh, J. K., & Park, J. M. (2011) · Progress in Polymer Science · doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2010.08.005 · Cited by 427
Kang, B., Okwieka, P., Schöttler, S., Winzen, S., Langhanki, J., Mohr, K., Opatz, T., Mailänder, V., Landfester, K., & Wurm, F. R. (2015) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201502398 · Cited by 159
Assessing the in Vivo Efficacy of Doxorubicin Loaded Hyaluronan Nanoparticles
El-Dakdouki, M. H., Xia, J., Zhu, D. C., Kavunja, H., Grieshaber, J., O’Reilly, S., McCormick, J. J., & Huang, X. (2014) · ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces · doi:10.1021/am404946v · Cited by 69
Metadata
- Authors
- El-Boubbou, K., Zhu, D. C., Vasileiou, C., Borhan, B., Prosperi, D., Li, W., & Huang, X.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2010-03-04
- Volume
- 132
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 4490-4499
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2088917108
- Cited by
- 250
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 10.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.