The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Soft Secondary Building Unit: Dynamic Bond Rearrangement on Multinuclear Core of Porous Coordination Polymers in Gas Media
Abstract
A new synthetic approach to prepare flexible porous coordination polymers (PCPs) by the use of soft secondary building units (SBUs) which can undergo multiple reversible metal-ligand bonds breaking is reported. We have prepared a zinc paddle-wheel-based two-fold interpenetrated PCP, {[Zn(2)(tp)(2)(L(2))]·2.5DMF·0.5water}(n) (2a, H(2)tp = terephthanlic acid; L(2) = 2,3-difluoro-1,4-bis(4-pyridyl)benzene), showing dynamic structural transformations upon the removal and rebinding of guest molecules. The X-ray structures at different degrees of desolvation indicate the highly flexible nature of the framework. The framework deformations involve slippage of the layers and movement of the two interpenetrated frameworks with respect to each other. Interestingly, the coordination geometry of a zinc paddle-wheel unit (one of the popular SBUs) is considerably changed by bond breaking between zinc and oxygen atoms during the drying process. Two zinc atoms in the dried form 2d reside in a distorted tetrahedral geometry. Compound 2d has no void volume and favors the uptake of O(2) over Ar and N(2) at 77 K. The O(2) and Ar adsorption isotherms of 2d show gate-opening-type adsorption behaviors corroborating the structure determination. The CO(2) adsorption isotherm at 195 K exhibits multiple steps originating from the flexibility of the framework. The structural transformations of the zinc clusters in the framework upon sorption of guest molecules are also characterized by Raman spectroscopy in which the characteristic bands corresponding to ν(sym)(COO(-)) vibration were used.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sing, K. S. W. (1985) · Pure and Applied Chemistry · doi:10.1351/pac198557040603 · Cited by 24,485
Ordered porous materials for emerging applications
Davis, M. E. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature00785 · Cited by 5,308
Tan, J. C., Bennett, T. D., & Cheetham, A. K. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1003205107 · Cited by 552
Cited by
Postsynthetic ligand exchange as a route to functionalization of ‘inert’ metal–organic frameworks
Kim, M., Cahill, J. F., Su, Y., Prather, K. A., & Cohen, S. M. (2012) · Chem. Sci. · doi:10.1039/c1sc00394a · Cited by 455
Coordination change, lability and hemilability in metal–organic frameworks
Morris, R. E., & Brammer, L. (2017) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c7cs00187h · Cited by 294
Nandi, M., Okada, K., Dutta, A., Bhaumik, A., Maruyama, J., Derks, D., & Uyama, H. (2012) · Chemical Communications · doi:10.1039/c2cc35334b · Cited by 278
Liu, H.-Y., Wu, P.-J., Kuo, S.-Y., Chen, C.-P., Chang, E.-H., Wu, C.-Y., & Chan, Y.-H. (2015) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.5b06710 · Cited by 181
Gating effect for gas adsorption in microporous materials—mechanisms and applications
Chen, K., Mousavi, S. H., Singh, R., Snurr, R. Q., Li, G., & Webley, P. A. (2022) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d1cs00822f · Cited by 133
Metadata
- Authors
- Seo, J., Bonneau, C., Matsuda, R., Takata, M., & Kitagawa, S.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2011-05-20
- Volume
- 133
- Issue
- 23
- Pages
- 9005-9013
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2327503319
- Cited by
- 207
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 11.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.