Cited by 181Quantum Dots Synthesis And PropertiesLuminescence and Fluorescent MaterialsMolecular Sensors and Ion Detection

Quinoxaline-Based Polymer Dots with Ultrabright Red to Near-Infrared Fluorescence for In Vivo Biological Imaging

Liu, Hong-Yi, Wu, Pei-Jing, Kuo, Shih-Yu, Chen, Chuan-Pin, Chang, En-Hao, Wu, Chang-Yi, Chan, Yang-Hsiang·2015·Journal of the American Chemical Society

Abstract

This article describes the design and synthesis of quinoxaline-based semiconducting polymer dots (Pdots) that exhibit near-infrared fluorescence, ultrahigh brightness, large Stokes shifts, and excellent cellular targeting capability. We also introduced fluorine atoms and long alkyl chains into polymer backbones and systematically investigated their effect on the fluorescence quantum yields of Pdots. These new series of quinoxaline-based Pdots have a fluorescence quantum yield as high as 47% with a Stokes shift larger than 150 nm. Single-particle analysis reveals that the average per-particle brightness of the Pdots is at least 6 times higher than that of the commercially available quantum dots. We further demonstrated the use of this new class of quinoxaline-based Pdots for effective and specific cellular and subcellular labeling without any noticeable nonspecific binding. Moreover, the cytotoxicity of Pdots were evaluated on HeLa cells and zebrafish embryos to demonstrate their great biocompatibility. By taking advantage of their extreme brightness and minimal cytotoxicity, we performed, for the first time, in vivo microangiography imaging on living zebrafish embryos using Pdots. These quinoxaline-based NIR-fluorescent Pdots are anticipated to find broad use in a variety of in vitro and in vivo biological research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jacs.5b06710

Cites

73 of 73 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, H.-Y., Wu, P.-J., Kuo, S.-Y., Chen, C.-P., Chang, E.-H., Wu, C.-Y., & Chan, Y.-H.
Affiliations
National Sun Yat-sen University (TW)
Corresponding author
Chan, Yang-Hsiang
Venue
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Published
2015-08-10
Volume
137
Issue
32
Pages
10420-10429
ISSN
  • 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5126
OpenAlex
W2411062454
Cited by
181
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 3
FWCI
10.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Chemical Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Taiwan University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Luminescence and Fluorescent Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Molecular Sensors and Ion Detection
Keywords
quinoxaline, polymer dots, semiconducting polymer dots, near-infrared fluorescence, red fluorescence, fluorescence quantum yield, Stokes shift, fluorine substitution, alkyl chain length, cell targeting, cytotoxicity, biocompatibility, zebrafish embryos, HeLa cells
MeSH terms
Animals, Embryo, Nonmammalian, Fluorescein Angiography, Fluorescence, Fluorine, HeLa Cells, Humans, Photochemistry, Quinoxalines, Semiconductors, Thiophenes, Zebrafish, Streptavidin, Quantum Dots, Chemistry Techniques, Synthetic, Optical Imaging, MCF-7 Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review