The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Introduction of Functionalized Mesopores to Metal–Organic Frameworks via Metal–Ligand–Fragment Coassembly
Abstract
Introduction of functionalized mesopores into microporous metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) can endow them with suitable properties for applications in gas storage, separation, catalysis, and drug delivery. However, common methods for functionalization (including pre- and post-synthetic modifications) of the internal surface of a MOF reduce the pore size of the MOF because the additional functional groups fill up the pores. We present a metal-ligand-fragment coassembly strategy for the introduction of (meso)pores functionalized with various substituent groups on the ligand fragments. Astonishingly, this new functionalization strategy increases the pore volume of a MOF instead of reducing it. Since the ligand fragments are often readily available or easily prepared, the new procedure for synthesis of the modified MOFs becomes much easier and more applicable than existing approaches. Remarkably, mesopores can be generated conveniently and controllably by the coassembly of a ligand and its fragment containing the desired functional groups. The fragment/ligand ratio has been optimized to preserve the parent structure and to promote maximum mesopore introduction, which has led to a systematic evaluation of the effectiveness of a series of functional groups for the adsorption of guest molecules.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Tuning the structure and function of metal–organic frameworks via linker design
Lu, W., Wei, Z., Gu, Z.-Y., Liu, T.-F., Park, J., Park, J., Tian, J., Zhang, M., Zhang, Q., Gentle III, T., et al. (2014) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/c4cs00003j · Cited by 2,252
Self-citationA facile synthesis of UiO-66, UiO-67 and their derivatives
Katz, M. J., Brown, Z. J., Colón, Y. J., Siu, P. W., Scheidt, K. A., Snurr, R. Q., Hupp, J. T., & Farha, O. K. (2013) · Chemical Communications · doi:10.1039/c3cc46105j · Cited by 1,756
Metal–Organic Framework-Based Hierarchically Porous Materials: Synthesis and Applications
Cai, G., Yan, P., Zhang, L., Zhou, H.-C., & Jiang, H.-L. (2021) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00243 · Cited by 1,631
Self-citationEmerging Multifunctional Metal–Organic Framework Materials
Li, B., Wen, H., Cui, Y., Zhou, W., Qian, G., & Chen, B. (2016) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201601133 · Cited by 1,587
Wu, H., Chua, Y. S., Krungleviciute, V., Tyagi, M., Chen, P., Yildirim, T., & Zhou, W. (2013) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja404514r · Cited by 1,457
From fundamentals to applications: a toolbox for robust and multifunctional MOF materials
Kirchon, A., Feng, L., Drake, H. F., Joseph, E. A., & Zhou, H.-C. (2018) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c8cs00688a · Cited by 1,448
Self-citationDefect‐Engineered Metal–Organic Frameworks
Fang, Z., Bueken, B., De Vos, D. E., & Fischer, R. A. (2015) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201411540 · Cited by 1,252
Vermoortele, F., Bueken, B., Le Bars, G., Van de Voorde, B., Vandichel, M., Houthoofd, K., Vimont, A., Daturi, M., Waroquier, M., Van Speybroeck, V., et al. (2013) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja405078u · Cited by 1,110
Correlated defect nanoregions in a metal–organic framework
Cliffe, M. J., Wan, W., Zou, X., Chater, P. A., Kleppe, A. K., Tucker, M. G., Wilhelm, H., Funnell, N. P., Coudert, F.-X., & Goodwin, A. L. (2014) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms5176 · Cited by 743
“Heterogeneity within Order” in Metal–Organic Frameworks
Furukawa, H., Müller, U., & Yaghi, O. M. (2015) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201410252 · Cited by 549
Metal–organic frameworks for the chemical fixation of CO2 into cyclic carbonates
Pal, T. K., De, D., & Bharadwaj, P. K. (2020) · Coordination Chemistry Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2019.213173 · Cited by 458
Metal-organic framework membranes for wastewater treatment and water regeneration
Li, J., Wang, H., Yuan, X., Zhang, J., & Chew, J. W. (2020) · Coordination Chemistry Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2019.213116 · Cited by 437
The surface chemistry of metal–organic frameworks
McGuire, C. V., & Forgan, R. S. (2015) · Chemical Communications · doi:10.1039/c4cc04458d · Cited by 396
Defects in Metal–Organic Frameworks: Challenge or Opportunity?
Sholl, D. S., & Lively, R. P. (2015) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b01135 · Cited by 357
Catalytic Zirconium/Hafnium-Based Metal–Organic Frameworks
Rimoldi, M., Howarth, A. J., DeStefano, M. R., Lin, L., Goswami, S., Li, P., Hupp, J. T., & Farha, O. K. (2017) · ACS Catalysis · doi:10.1021/acscatal.6b02923 · Cited by 332
Modulated self-assembly of metal–organic frameworks
Forgan, R. S. (2020) · Chemical Science · doi:10.1039/d0sc01356k · Cited by 320
Liao, Y.-T., Matsagar, B. M., & Wu, K. C.-W. (2018) · ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering · doi:10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b03683 · Cited by 317
Song, C., Hu, J., Ling, Y., Feng, Y., Krishna, R., Chen, D.-L., & He, Y. (2015) · Journal of Materials Chemistry A · doi:10.1039/c5ta05481h · Cited by 91
Metadata
- Authors
- Park, J., Wang, Z. U., Sun, L.-B., Chen, Y.-P., & Zhou, H.-C.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2012-12-03
- Volume
- 134
- Issue
- 49
- Pages
- 20110-20116
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2013207280
- Cited by
- 246
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.