The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ultrasensitive Nanosensors Based on Upconversion Nanoparticles for Selective Hypoxia Imaging in Vivo upon Near-Infrared Excitation
Abstract
Hypoxia is a distinct feature of malignant solid tumors, which is a possible causative factor for the serious resistance to chemo- and radiotherapy or the development of invasion and metastasis. The exploration of nanosensors with the capabilities like the accurate diagnosis of hypoxic level will be helpful to estimate the malignant degree of tumor and subsequently implement more effective personalized treatment. Here, we report the design and synthesis of nanosensors that can selectively and reversibly detect the level of hypoxia both in vitro and in vivo. The designed nanosensor is composed of two main moieties: oxygen indicator [Ru(dpp)3](2+)Cl2 for detection of hypoxia and upconversion nanoparticles for offering the excitation light of [Ru(dpp)3](2+)Cl2 by upconversion process under 980 nm exposure. The results show that the nanosensors can reversibly become quenched or luminescent under hyperoxic or hypoxic conditions, respectively. Compared with free [Ru(dpp)3](2+)Cl2, the designed nanosensors exhibit enhanced sensitivity for the detection of oxygen in hypoxic regions. More attractively, the nanosensors can image hypoxic regions with high penetration depth because the absorption and emission wavelength are within the NIR and far-red region, respectively. Most importantly, nanosensors display a high selectivity for detection of relevant oxygen changes in cells and zebrafish.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hypoxia — a key regulatory factor in tumour growth
Harris, A. L. (2002) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc704 · Cited by 5,177
A clearer vision for in vivo imaging
Weissleder, R. (2001) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/86684 · Cited by 3,839
Targeting hypoxia in cancer therapy
Wilson, W. R., & Hay, M. P. (2011) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc3064 · Cited by 3,172
Exploiting tumour hypoxia in cancer treatment
Brown, J. M., & Wilson, W. R. (2004) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc1367 · Cited by 2,828
Tumour hypoxia promotes tolerance and angiogenesis via CCL28 and Treg cells
Facciabene, A., Peng, X., Hagemann, I. S., Balint, K., Barchetti, A., Wang, L.-P., Gimotty, P. A., Gilks, C. B., Lal, P., Zhang, L., et al. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10169 · Cited by 1,376
Cited by
Ratiometric optical nanoprobes enable accurate molecular detection and imaging
Huang, X., Song, J., Yung, B. C., Huang, X., Xiong, Y., & Chen, X. (2018) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c7cs00612h · Cited by 820
Shao, W., Chen, G., Kuzmin, A., Kutscher, H. L., Pliss, A., Ohulchanskyy, T. Y., & Prasad, P. N. (2016) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.6b08973 · Cited by 386
Ding, B., Shao, S., Yu, C., Teng, B., Wang, M., Cheng, Z., Wong, K., Ma, P., & Lin, J. (2018) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201802479 · Cited by 312
Gu, B., & Zhang, Q. (2018) · Advanced Science · doi:10.1002/advs.201700609 · Cited by 292
Qin, S., Xu, Y., Li, H., Chen, H., & Yuan, Z. (2022) · Biomaterials Science · doi:10.1039/d1bm00317h · Cited by 56
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, J., Liu, Y., Bu, W., Bu, J., Sun, Y., Du, J., & Shi, J.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2014-06-27
- Volume
- 136
- Issue
- 27
- Pages
- 9701-9709
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2314305710
- Cited by
- 332
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 17.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.