The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nanostructured Thermosets from Self-Assembled Amphiphilic Block Copolymer/Epoxy Resin Mixtures
Abstract
Thermoset materials containing ordered structures with ∼10-nm dimensions were prepared from a mixture of a low-molecular-weight poly(ethylene oxide)−poly(ethylene- alt -propylene) (PEO−PEP) diblock copolymer and a poly(Bisphenol-A- co -epichlorohydrin) epoxy resin that selectively mixes with the PEO block. The phase behavior of PEO−PEP/epoxy blends, with compositions spanning 10−93 wt % block copolymer, was investigated in the uncured state (without hardener) using small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) and dynamic mechanical spectroscopy. Without hardener, the phase behavior of block copolymer/epoxy blends was similar to model block copolymer/homopolymer blends and varied with changes in the blend composition and temperature. The following morphologies were observed with increasing epoxy concentration: lamellar, cubic bicontinuous, hexagonally packed cylinders, body-centered cubic packed spheres, and disordered micelles. Methylene dianiline, an aromatic amine hardener, was added to the blends, and the real-time evolution of the phase behavior with cure was followed using SAXS measurements. As the epoxy molecular weight increased, the PEO block segregated from the epoxy matrix, as indicated by an increase in the principal spacing of the ordered structures and the occurrence of order−order phase transitions at certain compositions. However, macrophase separation between the epoxy and block copolymer did not occur. These results are interpreted as a transition from an equilibrium morphology to a chemically pinned metastable state as the cross-linking reaction progresses through the gel point.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fetters, L. J., Lohse, D. J., Richter, D., Witten, T. A., & Zirkel, A. (1994) · Macromolecules · doi:10.1021/ma00095a001 · Cited by 1,999
Organically modified aluminosilicate mesostructures from block copolymer phases
Templin, M., Franck, A., Du Chesne, A., Leist, H., Zhang, Y., Ulrich, R., Schädler, V., & Wiesner, U. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.278.5344.1795 · Cited by 668
Cited by
Ordered Nanoporous Polymers from Polystyrene−Polylactide Block Copolymers
Zalusky, A. S., Olayo-Valles, R., Wolf, J. H., & Hillmyer, M. A. (2002) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja0278584 · Cited by 553
Self-citationRubber-Toughened Epoxies: A Critical Review
Bagheri, R., Marouf, B. T., & Pearson, R. A. (2009) · Polymer Reviews · doi:10.1080/15583720903048227 · Cited by 455
Phase Behaviour and Morphologies of Block Copolymers
Abetz, V., & Simon, P. F. W. (2005) · Advances in Polymer Science · doi:10.1007/12_004 · Cited by 361
Morphology diagram of a diblock copolymer–aluminosilicate nanoparticle system
Garcia, B. C., Kamperman, M., Ulrich, R., Jain, A., Gruner, S. M., & Wiesner, U. (2009) · Chemistry of Materials · doi:10.1021/cm901885c · Cited by 74
Macro, micro and nanostructured morphologies of multiphase polymer systems
Huang, H. (2011) · Handbook of Multiphase Polymer Systems · doi:10.1002/9781119972020.ch6 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Lipic, P. M., Bates, F. S., & Hillmyer, M. A.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1998-08-18
- Volume
- 120
- Issue
- 35
- Pages
- 8963-8970
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2088757541
- Cited by
- 454
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.