Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 396

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Operando Spectroscopic Analysis of an Amorphous Cobalt Sulfide Hydrogen Evolution Electrocatalyst

Kornienko, Nikolay, Resasco, Joaquin, Becknell, Nigel, Jiang, Chang-Ming, Liu, Yi-Sheng, Nie, Kaiqi, Sun, Xuhui, Guo, Jinghua, Leone, Stephen R., Yang, Peidong·2015·Journal of the American Chemical Society
DOI 10.1021/jacs.5b03545
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The generation of chemical fuel in the form of molecular H2 via the electrolysis of water is regarded to be a promising approach to convert incident solar power into an energy storage medium. Highly efficient and cost-effective catalysts are required to make such an approach practical on a large scale. Recently, a number of amorphous hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) catalysts have emerged that show promise in terms of scalability and reactivity, yet remain poorly understood. In this work, we utilize Raman spectroscopy and X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) as a tool to elucidate the structure and function of an amorphous cobalt sulfide (CoSx) catalyst. Ex situ measurements reveal that the as-deposited CoSx catalyst is composed of small clusters in which the cobalt is surrounded by both sulfur and oxygen. Operando experiments, performed while the CoSx is catalyzing the HER, yield a molecular model in which cobalt is in an octahedral CoS2-like state where the cobalt center is predominantly surrounded by a first shell of sulfur atoms, which, in turn, are preferentially exposed to electrolyte relative to bulk CoS2. We surmise that these CoS2-like clusters form under cathodic polarization and expose a high density of catalytically active sulfur sites for the HER.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jacs.5b03545

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. Cui C., 1990, J. Electrochem. Soc., 137, 3418, 10.1149/1.2086232 · doi:10.1149/1.2086232
  2. Long D. A., 1977, Raman Spectroscopy
  3. Mosselmans J., 1995, Phys. Chem. Miner., 22, 311, 10.1007/BF00202771 · doi:10.1007/bf00202771
  4. Sano M., 1988, Inorg. Chem., 27, 4249, 10.1021/ic00296a033 · doi:10.1021/ic00296a033
  5. Jiang T., 1996, J. Mater. Chem., 11, 2242
  6. Charnock J., 1996, Phys. Chem. Miner., 23, 403, 10.1007/BF00202026 · doi:10.1007/bf00202026
  7. Nesvizhskii A., 1999, J. Synchrotron Radiat., 6, 315, 10.1107/S0909049599001697 · doi:10.1107/s0909049599001697
  8. De Groot F., 1990, Phys. Rev. B, 42, 5459, 10.1103/PhysRevB.42.5459 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.42.5459
  9. Liu H., 2007, Nano Lett., 7, 1919, 10.1021/nl070586o · doi:10.1021/nl070586o
  10. Van der Laan G., 1991, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter, 3, 7443
  11. Adam R., 2011, J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom., 184, 291, 10.1016/j.elspec.2010.12.017 · doi:10.1016/j.elspec.2010.12.017
  12. Fleet M. E., 2005, Can. Mineral., 43, 1605, 10.2113/gscanmin.43.5.1605 · doi:10.2113/gscanmin.43.5.1605
  13. Farrell S. P., 2002, Am. Mineral., 87, 1321, 10.2138/am-2002-1007 · doi:10.2138/am-2002-1007
  14. Lyapin S., 2014, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter, 26, 396001
  15. Nakamura K., 1990, Phys. Rev. B, 41, 12260, 10.1103/PhysRevB.41.12260 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.41.12260
  16. Gasanly N., 2005, J. Raman Spectrosc., 36, 879, 10.1002/jrs.1375 · doi:10.1002/jrs.1375
  17. Mcneil M. B., 1992, J. Am. Inst. Conserv., 31, 355, 10.1179/019713692806066574 · doi:10.1179/019713692806066574
  18. Oklejas V., 2004, Appl. Spectrosc., 58, 945, 10.1366/0003702041655511 · doi:10.1366/0003702041655511
  19. Roy D., 1984, J. Chem. Phys., 81, 4168, 10.1063/1.448129 · doi:10.1063/1.448129
  20. Weaver M. J., 1985, J. Chem. Phys., 82, 4867, 10.1063/1.448657 · doi:10.1063/1.448657
  21. Weaver M. J., 1984, J. Electroanal. Chem. Interfacial Electrochem., 160, 321, 10.1016/S0022-0728(84)80135-7 · doi:10.1016/s0022-0728(84)80135-7
  22. Corio P., 2003, Chem. Phys. Lett., 370, 675, 10.1016/S0009-2614(03)00157-X · doi:10.1016/s0009-2614(03)00157-x
  23. Rao A. M., 1997, Nature, 388, 257, 10.1038/40827 · doi:10.1038/40827
  24. Han X. X., 2013, Small, 9, 4175, 10.1002/smll.201301070 · doi:10.1002/smll.201301070
  25. Pavlov N., 2009, Phys. Solid State, 51, 2207, 10.1134/S1063783409110018 · doi:10.1134/s1063783409110018
  26. Bullett D., 1982, J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys., 15, 6163, 10.1088/0022-3719/15/30/010 · doi:10.1088/0022-3719/15/30/010
  27. Muro T., 1998, J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom., 88, 361, 10.1016/S0368-2048(97)00180-1 · doi:10.1016/s0368-2048(97)00180-1
  28. Zhao G., 1993, Phys. Rev. B, 48, 15781, 10.1103/PhysRevB.48.15781 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.48.15781
  29. Miyauchi H., 1996, J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom., 78, 255, 10.1016/S0368-2048(96)80073-9 · doi:10.1016/s0368-2048(96)80073-9
  30. Teo B., 1981, EXAFS Spectroscopy: Techniques and Applications, 10.1007/978-1-4757-1238-4 · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-1238-4
  31. van Bokhoven J., 2004, In-Situ Spectroscopy of Catalysts
  32. Castner D. G., 1990, J. Phys. Chem., 94, 819, 10.1021/j100365a057 · doi:10.1021/j100365a057
  33. Paul J.-F., 2003, J. Phys. Chem. B, 107, 4057, 10.1021/jp027668f · doi:10.1021/jp027668f
  34. Tye C. T., 2006, Top. Catal., 37, 129, 10.1007/s11244-006-0014-9 · doi:10.1007/s11244-006-0014-9
  35. Garcia M. V., 1989, J. Catal., 119, 388, 10.1016/0021-9517(89)90169-3 · doi:10.1016/0021-9517(89)90169-3
  36. Ho T. C., 2003, Catal. Lett., 89, 21, 10.1023/A:1024703006614 · doi:10.1023/a:1024703006614

Cited by

See all 396

Metadata

Authors
Kornienko, N., Resasco, J., Becknell, N., Jiang, C.-M., Liu, Y.-S., Nie, K., Sun, X., Guo, J., Leone, S. R., & Yang, P.
Venue
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Publisher
American Chemical Society (ACS)
Published
2015-06-08
Volume
137
Issue
23
Pages
7448-7455
ISSN
  • 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5126
DOI
10.1021/jacs.5b03545
OpenAlex
W2290983583
Cited by
396
References
50
FWCI
12.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Funders
  • Division of Graduate Education (DGE-0802270)
  • Basic Energy Sciences (DE-AC02-05CH11231)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.