The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Pressure-Induced Phase Transformation, Reversible Amorphization, and Anomalous Visible Light Response in Organolead Bromide Perovskite
Open accessAbstract
Hydrostatic pressure, as an alternative of chemical pressure to tune the crystal structure and physical properties, is a significant technique for novel function material design and fundamental research. In this article, we report the phase stability and visible light response of the organolead bromide perovskite, CH3NH3PbBr3 (MAPbBr3), under hydrostatic pressure up to 34 GPa at room temperature. Two phase transformations below 2 GPa (from Pm3̅m to Im3̅, then to Pnma) and a reversible amorphization starting from about 2 GPa were observed, which could be attributed to the tilting of PbBr6 octahedra and destroying of long-range ordering of MA cations, respectively. The visible light response of MAPbBr3 to pressure was studied by in situ photoluminescence, electric resistance, photocurrent measurements and first-principle simulations. The anomalous band gap evolution during compression with red-shift followed by blue-shift is explained by the competition between compression effect and pressure-induced amorphization. Along with the amorphization process accomplished around 25 GPa, the resistance increased by 5 orders of magnitude while the system still maintains its semiconductor characteristics and considerable response to the visible light irradiation. Our results not only show that hydrostatic pressure may provide an applicable tool for the organohalide perovskites based photovoltaic device functioning as switcher or controller, but also shed light on the exploration of more amorphous organometal composites as potential light absorber.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kim, H.-S., Lee, C.-R., Im, J.-H., Lee, K.-B., Moehl, T., Marchioro, A., Moon, S.-J., Humphry-Baker, R., Yum, J.-H., Moser, J. E., et al. (2012) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep00591 · Cited by 8,092
Cited by
van der Stam, W., Geuchies, J. J., Altantzis, T., van den Bos, K. H. W., Meeldijk, J. D., Van Aert, S., Bals, S., Vanmaekelbergh, D., & de Mello Donega, C. (2017) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.6b13079 · Cited by 732
Jaffe, A., Lin, Y., Beavers, C. M., Voss, J., Mao, W. L., & Karunadasa, H. I. (2016) · ACS Central Science · doi:10.1021/acscentsci.6b00055 · Cited by 448
Temperature-Dependent Optical Band Gap in CsPbBr3, MAPbBr3, and FAPbBr3 Single Crystals
Mannino, G., Deretzis, I., Smecca, E., La Magna, A., Alberti, A., Ceratti, D., & Cahen, D. (2020) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1021/acs.jpclett.0c00295 · Cited by 355
Li, F., Liu, Y., Wang, H., Zhan, Q., Liu, Q., & Xia, Z. (2018) · Chemistry of Materials · doi:10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b03442 · Cited by 339
High‐Pressure Band‐Gap Engineering in Lead‐Free Cs2AgBiBr6 Double Perovskite
Li, Q., Wang, Y., Pan, W., Yang, W., Zou, B., Tang, J., & Quan, Z. (2017) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201708684 · Cited by 292
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, Y., Lü, X., Yang, W., Wen, T., Yang, L., Ren, X., Wang, L., Lin, Z., & Zhao, Y.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2015-08-21
- Volume
- 137
- Issue
- 34
- Pages
- 11144-11149
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2341983749
- Cited by
- 393
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.