Cited by 2Protein Structure and DynamicsBiochemical and Structural CharacterizationEnzyme Catalysis and Immobilization

Optimizing Stability in Dynamic Small-Molecule Binding Proteins

Open access
Scherer, Marc, Kriegel, Mark, Höcker, Birte, Fleishman, Sarel J.·2026·Journal of the American Chemical Society

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

The function of dynamic proteins is determined by the stability of distinct conformational states and the energy barriers that separate these states. For most dynamic proteins, the molecular details of the energy barriers are not known, implying a fundamental limit to the ability of protein design methods to engineer beneficial mutations without disrupting activity. We hypothesized that designing mutations that are compatible with structurally distinct equilibrium conformations may enable a reliable stability design. We focus on periplasmic binding proteins (PBPs), a superfamily of dynamic proteins that change conformation from open to closed states in response to binding their small-molecule ligands. We find that the evolutionary constrained space of allowed mutations computed for one conformation is incompatible with that for the other. Therefore, putative conformational hinge points and interface residues were additionally constrained, and incompatible mutations were filtered out. Starting from four different PBPs, we designed a total of 16 stabilized variants with 7-28 mutations each. Our results show that design based on a single conformation with evolutionary constraints is not sufficient to maintain a wild-type-like binding affinity. Conversely, using a subset of mutations compatible with both conformations and structural constraints reliably enhances thermal stability while mitigating trade-offs in ligand binding. Our work demonstrates a straightforward method for the one-shot stabilization of dynamic proteins, which is critically required to generate robust starting points for thermostable and responsive biosensors.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jacs.5c19571

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Scherer, M., Kriegel, M., Höcker, B., & Fleishman, S. J.
Affiliations
  • Weizmann Institute of Science (IL)
  • University of Bayreuth (DE)
Corresponding author
  • Höcker, Birte
  • Fleishman, Sarel J.
Venue
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Published
2025-12-29
Volume
148
Issue
1
Pages
1911-1918
ISSN
  • 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5126
OpenAlex
W7117490406
Cited by
2
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 2
FWCI
0.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Chemical Society (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Weizmann Institute of Science
  • European Commission (955623, 951375)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biochemical and Structural Characterization
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Enzyme Catalysis and Immobilization
Keywords
protein stability engineering, periplasmic binding protein, conformational barriers, ligand binding affinity, thermal stability, interface residues
MeSH terms
Ligands, Models, Molecular, Mutation, Protein Conformation, Protein Engineering, Periplasmic Binding Proteins, Protein Stability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review