The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Synthesis of Hollow Biomineralized CaCO3–Polydopamine Nanoparticles for Multimodal Imaging-Guided Cancer Photodynamic Therapy with Reduced Skin Photosensitivity
Abstract
The development of activatable nanoplatforms to simultaneously improve diagnostic and therapeutic performances while reducing side effects is highly attractive for precision cancer medicine. Herein, we develop a one-pot, dopamine-mediated biomineralization method using a gas diffusion procedure to prepare calcium carbonate-polydopamine (CaCO 3 –PDA) composite hollow nanoparticles as a multifunctional theranostic nanoplatform. Because of the high sensitivity of such nanoparticles to pH, with rapid degradation under a slightly acidic environment, the photoactivity of the loaded photosensitizer, i.e., chlorin e6 (Ce6), which is quenched by PDA, is therefore increased within the tumor under reduced pH, showing recovered fluorescence and enhanced singlet oxygen generation. In addition, due to the strong affinity between metal ions and PDA, our nanoparticles can bind with various types of metal ions, conferring them with multimodal imaging capability. By utilizing pH-responsive multifunctional nanocarriers, effective in vivo antitumor photodynamic therapy (PDT) can be realized under the precise guidance of multimodal imaging. Interestingly, at normal physiological pH, our nanoparticles are quenched and show much lower phototoxicity to normal tissues, thus effectively reducing skin damage during PDT. Therefore, our work presents a unique type of biomineralized theranostic nanoparticles with inherent biocompatibility, multimodal imaging functionality, high antitumor PDT efficacy, and reduced skin phototoxicity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Liu, Y., Ai, K., & Lu, L. (2014) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr400407a · Cited by 4,794
Cited by
Inorganic nanomaterials with rapid clearance for biomedical applications
Wang, X., Zhong, X., Li, J., Liu, Z., & Cheng, L. (2021) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d0cs00461h · Cited by 509
Self-citationRecent Advances in a Polydopamine-Mediated Antimicrobial Adhesion System
Singh, I., Dhawan, G., Gupta, S., & Kumar, P. (2021) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2020.607099 · Cited by 163
Design and application of inorganic nanoparticles for sonodynamic cancer therapy
Sun, L., Wang, P., Zhang, J., Sun, Y., Sun, S., Xu, M., Zhang, L., Wang, S., Liang, X., & Cui, L. (2021) · Biomaterials Science · doi:10.1039/d0bm01875a · Cited by 115
Nanoparticle Interactions with the Tumor Microenvironment
Huai, Y., Hossen, M. N., Wilhelm, S., Bhattacharya, R., & Mukherjee, P. (2019) · Bioconjugate Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.9b00448 · Cited by 113
Recent Developments of Inorganic Nanosensitizers for Sonodynamic Therapy
He, Z., Du, J., Miao, Y., & Li, Y. (2023) · Advanced Healthcare Materials · doi:10.1002/adhm.202300234 · Cited by 105
Metadata
- Authors
- Dong, Z., Feng, L., Hao, Y., Chen, M., Gao, M., Chao, Y., Zhao, H., Zhu, W., Liu, J., Liang, C., Zhang, Q., & Liu, Z.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2018-02-06
- Volume
- 140
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2165-2178
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2784549607
- Cited by
- 490
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 24.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.