Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 171

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cooperative and Competitive Occlusion of Organic and Inorganic Structure-Directing Agents within Chabazite Zeolites Influences Their Aluminum Arrangement

Di Iorio, John R., Li, Sichi, Jones, Casey B., Nimlos, Claire T., Wang, Yujia, Kunkes, Eduard, Vattipalli, Vivek, Prasad, Subramanian, Moini, Ahmad, Schneider, William F., Gounder, Rajamani·2020·Journal of the American Chemical Society

Abstract

We combine experiment and theory to investigate the cooperation or competition between organic and inorganic structure-directing agents (SDAs) for occupancy within microporous voids of chabazite (CHA) zeolites and to rationalize the effects of SDA siting on biasing the framework Al arrangement (Al–O(−Si–O) x –Al, x = 1–3) among CHA zeolites of essentially fixed composition (Si/Al = 15). CHA zeolites crystallized using mixtures of TMAda + and Na + contain one TMAda + occluded per cage and Na + co-occluded in an amount linearly proportional to the number of 6-MR paired Al sites, quantified by Co 2+ titration. In contrast, CHA zeolites crystallized using mixtures of TMAda + and K + provide evidence that three K + cations, on average, displace one TMAda + from occupying a cage and contain predominantly 6-MR isolated Al sites. Moreover, CHA crystallizes from synthesis media containing more than 10-fold higher inorganic-to-organic ratios with K + than with Na + before competing crystalline phases form, providing a route to decrease the amount of organic SDA needed to crystallize high-silica CHA. Density functional theory calculations show that differences in the ionic radii of Na + and K + determine their preferences for siting in different CHA rings, which influences their energy to co-occlude with TMAda + and stabilize different Al configurations. Monte Carlo models confirm that energy differences resulting from Na + or K + co-occlusion promote the formation of 6-MR and 8-MR paired Al arrangements, respectively. These results highlight opportunities to exploit using mixtures of organic and inorganic SDAs during zeolite crystallization in order to more efficiently use organic SDAs and influence framework Al arrangements.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jacs.9b13817

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 171

Metadata

Authors
Di Iorio, J. R., Li, S., Jones, C. B., Nimlos, C. T., Wang, Y., Kunkes, E., Vattipalli, V., Prasad, S., Moini, A., Schneider, W. F., & Gounder, R.
Venue
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Published
2020-02-13
Volume
142
Issue
10
Pages
4807-4819
ISSN
  • 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5126
OpenAlex
W3005693785
Cited by
171
References
5
FWCI
14.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cooperative and Competitive Occlusion of Organic and Inorganic Structure-Directing Agents within Chabazite Zeolites Influences Their Aluminum Arrangement. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jacs.9b13817
The paper
Di Iorio, J. R., Li, S., Jones, C. B., Nimlos, C. T., Wang, Y., Kunkes, E., Vattipalli, V., Prasad, S., Moini, A., Schneider, W. F., & Gounder, R. (2020). Cooperative and Competitive Occlusion of Organic and Inorganic Structure-Directing Agents within Chabazite Zeolites Influences Their Aluminum Arrangement. Journal of the American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.9b13817

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.