The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Varietal Differences among the Polyphenol Profiles of Seven Table Grape Cultivars Studied by LC−DAD−MS−MS
Abstract
Polyphenols present in red table grape varieties Red Globe, Flame Seedless, Crimson Seedless, and Napoleon, and the white varieties Superior Seedless, Dominga, and Moscatel Italica were analyzed by HPLC-DAD-MS. The anthocyanins peonidin 3-glucoside, cyanidin 3-glucoside (and their corresponding p-coumaroyl derivatives), malvidin 3-glucoside, petunidin 3-glucoside, and delphinidin 3-glucoside were found. In addition, caffeoyltartaric acid, p-coumaroyltartaric acid, and the flavonols quercetin 3-glucuronide, quercetin 3-rutinoside, quercetin 3-glucoside, kaempferol 3-galactoside, kaempferol 3-glucoside, and isorhamnetin 3-glucoside were detected. Flavan-3-ols were also detected, and were identified as gallocatechin, procyanidin B1, procyanidin B2, procyanidin B4, procyanidin C1, catechin, and epigallocatechin. These phenolics were present only in the skin, as the flesh of these grape cultivars was almost devoid of these compounds. Anthocyanins were the main phenolics in red grapes ranging from 69 (Crimson Seedless) to 151 (Flame Seedless) mg/kg fresh weight of grapes, whereas flavan-3-ols were the most abundant phenolics in the white varieties ranging from 52 (Dominga) to 81 (Moscatel Italica) mg/kg fresh weight of grapes. Total phenolics ranged from 115 (Dominga) to 361 (Flame Seedless) mg/kg fresh weight of grapes. This means that a serving of unpeeled table grapes (200 g) could provide up to 72 mg of total phenolics (Flame Seedless). These results indicate that the intake of unpeeled table grapes should be recommended in dietary habits as a potential source of antioxidant and anticarcinogenic phenolic compounds.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lazarus, S. A., Adamson, G. E., Hammerstone, J. F., & Schmitz, H. H. (1999) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf9813642 · Cited by 263
Cited by
Shahidi, F., & Ambigaipalan, P. (2015) · Journal of Functional Foods · doi:10.1016/j.jff.2015.06.018 · Cited by 3,081
Biological Activities of Polyphenols from Grapes
Xia, E.-Q., Deng, G.-F., Guo, Y.-J., & Li, H.-B. (2010) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms11020622 · Cited by 1,063
Flavonol Profiles of Vitis vinifera Red Grapes and Their Single-Cultivar Wines
Castillo-Muñoz, N., Gómez-Alonso, S., García-Romero, E., & Hermosín-Gutiérrez, I. (2007) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf062800k · Cited by 396
Gómez-Alonso, S., García-Romero, E., & Hermosín-Gutiérrez, I. (2007) · Journal of Food Composition and Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.jfca.2007.03.002 · Cited by 294
DOPICOGARCIA, M., FIQUE, A., GUERRA, L., AFONSO, J., PEREIRA, O., VALENTAO, P., ANDRADE, P., & SEABRA, R. (2008) · Talanta · doi:10.1016/j.talanta.2008.01.012 · Cited by 71
Metadata
- Authors
- Cantos, E., Espín, J. C., & Tomás-Barberán, F. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2002-08-30
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 5691-5696
- ISSN
- 0021-8561 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5118
- OpenAlex
- W2013310688
- Cited by
- 340
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Varietal Differences among the Polyphenol Profiles of Seven Table Grape Cultivars Studied by LC−DAD−MS−MS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jf0204102
- The paper
- Cantos, E., Espín, J. C., & Tomás-Barberán, F. A. (2002). Varietal Differences among the Polyphenol Profiles of Seven Table Grape Cultivars Studied by LC−DAD−MS−MS. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf0204102
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.