The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Antioxidant Activity and Constituents of Propolis Collected in Various Areas of Korea
Abstract
Propolis is a resinous substance collected by honeybees from various plant sources. The composition of propolis depends on time, vegetation, and the area of collection. This study examined the antioxidant activity of propolis from various areas of Korea: Chilgok, Cheongju, Geochang, Muju, Pocheon, and Sangju. Ethanol extracts of propolis (EEP) were prepared and evaluated for their antioxidant activity by beta-carotene bleaching, 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl free radical scavenging, and 2,2'-azinobis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) radical cation decolorization assays. Furthermore, the major constituents in EEP were identified by high-performance liquid chromatography analysis with a photodiode array and mass spectrometric detection, and each component was quantitatively analyzed. EEP from Cheongju and Muju had relatively strong antioxidant activity accompanied by high total polyphenol contents. Propolis from Cheongju contained large amounts of antioxidative compounds, such as caffeic acid, kaempferol, and phenethyl caffeate. On the other hand, propolis from Pocheon had compounds not seen in propolis from other areas.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Antioxidant activity of plant extracts containing phenolic compounds
Kähkönen, M. P., Hopia, A. I., Vuorela, H. J., Rauha, J.-P., Pihlaja, K., Kujala, T. S., & Heinonen, M. (1999) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf990146l · Cited by 3,854
Research works printed but not linked: 52
- Castaldo S., 2002, Fitoterapia, 73, S6, 10.1016/S0367-326X(02)00185-5 · DOI · Paper page
- Kujumgiev A., 1999, J. Ethnopharmacol., 64, 240, 10.1016/S0378-8741(98)00131-7 · DOI · Paper page
- Kartal M., 2003, J. Ethnopharmacol., 86, 73, 10.1016/S0378-8741(03)00042-4 · doi:10.1016/s0378-8741(03)00042-4
- Amoros M., 1994, J. Nat. Prod., 64, 240
- Wang L., 1993, Jpn. J. Pharmacol. Ther., 24, 224
- Strehl E., 1994, Z. Naturforsch., 49, 43, 10.1515/znb-1994-0110 · doi:10.1515/znb-1994-0110
- Kimoto T., 2001, Anticancer Res., 21, 228
- Matsuno T, 1995, Z. Naturforsch., 50, 97
- Murad J. M., 2002, J. Ethnopharmacol., 79, 334, 10.1016/S0378-8741(01)00404-4 · doi:10.1016/s0378-8741(01)00404-4
- Ikeno K., 1991, Caries Res., 25, 351, 10.1159/000261390 · DOI · Paper page
- Burdock G. A, 1998, Food Chem. Toxicol., 36, 363, 10.1016/S0278-6915(97)00145-2 · DOI · Paper page
- Banskota A. H., 2001, Phytother. Res., 15, 571, 10.1002/ptr.1029 · DOI · Paper page
- Nieva Moreno M. I., 2000, J. Ethnopharmacol., 71, 114
- Bonvehí J. S., 1994, J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc., 71, 532, 10.1007/BF02540666 · DOI · Paper page
- Kumazawa S., 2004, Food Chem., 84, 339, 10.1016/S0308-8146(03)00216-4 · DOI · Paper page
- Marcucci M. C., 1995, Apidologie, 26, 99, 10.1051/apido:19950202 · DOI · Paper page
- Bankova V., 1992, Apidologie, 23, 85, 10.1051/apido:19920109 · doi:10.1051/apido:19920109
- Velikova M., 2001, Mellifera, 1, 59
- Kumazawa S., 2004, Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem., 68, 262
- Bankova V. S., 2000, Apidologie, 31, 15, 10.1051/apido:2000102 · DOI · Paper page
- Marcucci M. C., 1999, Curr. Top. Phytochem., 2, 123
- Tazawa S., 1998, Chem. Pharm. Bull., 46, 1479, 10.1248/cpb.46.1477 · doi:10.1248/cpb.46.1477
- Tazawa S., 1999, Chem. Pharm. Bull., 47, 1392, 10.1248/cpb.47.1388 · doi:10.1248/cpb.47.1388
- Kumazawa S., 2003, Chem. Pharm. Bull., 51, 742, 10.1248/cpb.51.740 · DOI · Paper page
- Kolankaya D., 2002, Food Chem., 78, 217, 10.1016/S0308-8146(01)00400-9 · DOI
- Ozen S., 2004, J. Appl. Toxicol., 24, 35, 10.1002/jat.941 · doi:10.1002/jat.941
- Shimizu K., 2004, Arch. Biochem. Biophys., 424, 188, 10.1016/j.abb.2004.02.021 · DOI
- Hamasaka T., 2004, Food Sci. Technol. Res., 10, 92, 10.3136/fstr.10.86 · DOI
- Chee H. Y., 2002, In vitro evaluation of the antifungal activity of propolis extract on Cryptococcus Neoformans and Candida albicans. Mycobiology
- Song Y. S., 2002, J. Ethnopharmacol., 82, 95
- Kumazawa S., 2002, J. Agric. Food Chem., 50, 4782
- Singleton V. L., 1999, Methods Enzymol., 299, 178, 10.1016/S0076-6879(99)99018-3 · DOI
- Kumazawa S., 2002, J. Agric. Food Chem., 50, 377
- Woisky R. G., 1998, J. Apic. Res., 37, 105, 10.1080/00218839.1998.11100961 · DOI · Paper page
- Emmons C. L., 1999, J. Agric. Food Chem., 47, 4898, 10.1021/jf990530i · DOI · Paper page
- Okada Y., 1998, J. Agric. Food Chem., 46, 406, 10.1021/jf970470l · DOI
- Erel O, 2004, Clin. Biochem., 37, 285
- Liu M., 2002, J. Agric. Food Chem., 50, 2930
- Luximon-Ramma A., 2002, J. Agric. Food Chem., 50, 5047, 10.1021/jf0201172 · DOI · Paper page
- Unten L., 1997, J. Agric. Food Chem., 45, 2019, 10.1021/jf9607526 · doi:10.1021/jf9607526
- Singh R. P., 2002, J. Agric. Food Chem., 50, 86
- Martos I., 1997, J. Agric. Food Chem., 45, 2829, 10.1021/jf9609284 · DOI
- Isla M. I., 2001, J. Ethnopharmacol., 76, 170
- Bonvehí J. S., 1994, Z. Naturforsch., 49, 718
- Pascual C., 1994, J. Ethnopharmacol., 41, 13, 10.1016/0378-8741(94)90052-3 · DOI · Paper page
- Krol W., 1990, Biochem. Int., 21, 597
- Chen C. W., 1995, J. Food Lipids, 2, 46
- Tang S. Z., 2002, Food Chem., 76, 51
- Nagai T., 2003, Food Chem., 80, 33, 10.1016/S0308-8146(02)00231-5 · DOI · Paper page
- Hatano T., 1997, Chem. Pharm. Bull., 45, 1492, 10.1248/cpb.45.1485 · DOI
- Fujimoto T., 2001, Honeybee Sci., 22, 16
- Tomás-Barberán F. A., 1993, Phytochemistry, 34, 196
Cited by
Recent trends and important developments in propolis research
Bankova, V. (2005) · Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine · doi:10.1093/ecam/neh059 · Cited by 569
Advances in the analysis of phenolic compounds in products derived from bees
Gómez-Caravaca, A. M., Gómez-Romero, M., Arráez-Román, D., Segura-Carretero, A., & Fernández-Gutiérrez, A. (2006) · Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.jpba.2006.03.002 · Cited by 441
Sun, C., Wu, Z., Wang, Z., & Zhang, H. (2015) · Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine · doi:10.1155/2015/595393 · Cited by 323
Propolis: a new frontier for wound healing?
Martinotti, S., & Ranzato, E. (2015) · Burns & Trauma · doi:10.1186/s41038-015-0010-z · Cited by 213
Hypoglycaemic and Antioxidant Effects of Propolis of Chihuahua in a Model of Experimental Diabetes
Rivera-Yañez, N., Rodriguez-Canales, M., Nieto-Yañez, O., Jimenez-Estrada, M., Ibarra-Barajas, M., Canales-Martinez, M. M., & Rodriguez-Monroy, M. A. (2018) · Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine · doi:10.1155/2018/4360356 · Cited by 83
Metadata
- Authors
- Ahn, M.-R., Kumazawa, S., Hamasaka, T., Bang, K.-S., & Nakayama, T.
- Venue
- Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2004-11-02
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 7286-7292
- ISSN
- 0021-8561 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5118
- OpenAlex
- W1999301504
- Cited by
- 264
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Antioxidant Activity and Constituents of Propolis Collected in Various Areas of Korea. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jf048726s
- The paper
- Ahn, M.-R., Kumazawa, S., Hamasaka, T., Bang, K.-S., & Nakayama, T. (2004). Antioxidant Activity and Constituents of Propolis Collected in Various Areas of Korea. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf048726s
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.