The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Determination of Ascorbic Acid and Carotenoids in Food Commodities by Liquid Chromatography with Mass Spectrometry Detection
Abstract
Two methods, one to determine ascorbic acid and one to determine lycopene and beta-carotene, in vegetables and fruits by liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry (LC-MS) have been established. The chromatographic separation of the studied compounds and their MS parameters were optimized to improve selectivity and sensitivity. In both methods, separation was carried out with two coupled columns, first a C(18) and then a dC(18), using as mobile phase 70% methanol (0.005% acetic acid) and 30% acetic acid 0.05% for ascorbic acid determination and a mixture of methanol, tetrahydrofuran, and acetonitrile (60:30:10 v/v/v) for carotenoid analysis in isocratic mode. The molecular ion was selected for the quantification in selective ion monitoring (SIM) mode. Ascorbic acid was detected with electrospray ionization probe (ESI) in negative mode, while chemical ionization atmospheric pressure (APCI) in positive mode was used for the target carotenoids. The methodology for ascorbic acid analysis is based on an extraction with polytron using methanol and a mixture of methaphosphoric acid and acetic acid. Extraction of the carotenoids was carried out with tetrahydrofuran/methanol (1:1) (v/v). The proposed methods were applied, after their corresponding validations, to the analysis of four varieties of tomatoes, tomato in tin enriched and dried tomato, and to the analysis of mango and kiwi fruits, to compare the content in these compounds. Moreover, the influence of the process of freezing and the effect that the manipulation/preservation has in the content of ascorbic acid in tomato have also been studied.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lycopene: A Biologically Important Carotenoid for Humans?
Stahl, W., & Sies, H. (1996) · Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics · doi:10.1006/abbi.1996.0525 · Cited by 712
Cited by
Maiani, G., Periago Castón, M. J., Catasta, G., Toti, E., Cambrodón, I. G., Bysted, A., Granado‐Lorencio, F., Olmedilla‐Alonso, B., Knuthsen, P., Valoti, M., et al. (2009) · Molecular Nutrition & Food Research · doi:10.1002/mnfr.200800053 · Cited by 773
Zhu, X., Zhao, T., Nie, Z., Liu, Y., & Yao, S. (2015) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.analchem.5b02167 · Cited by 265
Rodriguez-Amaya, D. B. (2010) · Journal of Food Composition and Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.jfca.2010.03.008 · Cited by 254
HPLC methods for simultaneous determination of ascorbic and dehydroascorbic acids
Nováková, L., Solich, P., & Solichová, D. (2008) · TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.trac.2008.08.006 · Cited by 210
Gao, X., Zhou, X., Ma, Y., Qian, T., Wang, C., & Chu, F. (2019) · Applied Surface Science · doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.11.095 · Cited by 143
Metadata
- Authors
- Frenich, A. G., Torres, M. E. H., Vega, A. B., Vidal, J. L. M., & Bolaños, P. P.
- Venue
- Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2005-09-01
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 7371-7376
- ISSN
- 0021-8561 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5118
- OpenAlex
- W1984223245
- Cited by
- 167
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.