The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Antimicrobial and Antioxidant Properties of Rosemary and Sage (Rosmarinus officinalis L. and Salvia officinalis L., Lamiaceae) Essential Oils
Abstract
The essential oils of rosemary ( Rosmarinus officinalis L.) and sage ( Salvia officinalis L.) were analyzed by means of gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and assayed for their antimicrobial and antioxidant activities. Antimicrobial activity was tested against 13 bacterial strains and 6 fungi, including Candida albicans and 5 dermatomycetes. The most important antibacterial activity of both essential oils was expressed on Escherichia coli, Salmonella typhi, S. enteritidis, and Shigella sonei. A significant rate of antifungal activity, especially of essential oil of rosemary, was also exhibited. Antioxidant activity was evaluated as a free radical scavenging capacity (RSC), together with the effect on lipid peroxidation (LP). RSC was assessed by measuring the scavenging activity of essential oils on 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazil (DPPH) and hydroxyl radicals. Effects on LP were evaluated following the activities of essential oils in Fe(2+)/ascorbate and Fe(2+)/H2O2 systems of induction. Investigated essential oils reduced the DPPH radical formation (IC50 = 3.82 microg/mL for rosemary and 1.78 microg/mL for sage) in a dose-dependent manner. Strong inhibition of LP in both systems of induction was especially observed for the essential oil of rosemary.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Plant Products as Antimicrobial Agents
Cowan, M. M. (1999) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.12.4.564 · Cited by 9,043
Antimicrobial activity of essential oils and other plant extracts
Hammer, K. A., Carson, C. F., & Riley, T. V. (1999) · Journal of Applied Microbiology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2672.1999.00780.x · Cited by 2,560
Cited by
Antioxidant Activity of Essential Oils
Amorati, R., Foti, M. C., & Valgimigli, L. (2013) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf403496k · Cited by 803
Pharmacological properties of Salvia officinalis and its components
Ghorbani, A., & Esmaeilizadeh, M. (2017) · Journal of Traditional and Complementary Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.jtcme.2016.12.014 · Cited by 677
Essential Oils as Antimicrobial Agents—Myth or Real Alternative?
Wińska, K., Mączka, W., Łyczko, J., Grabarczyk, M., Czubaszek, A., & Szumny, A. (2019) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules24112130 · Cited by 591
Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Properties of Rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis, L.): A Review
Nieto, G., Ros, G., & Castillo, J. (2018) · Medicines · doi:10.3390/medicines5030098 · Cited by 574
Rašković, A., Milanović, I., Pavlović, N., Ćebović, T., Vukmirović, S., & Mikov, M. (2014) · BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine · doi:10.1186/1472-6882-14-225 · Cited by 470
Metadata
- Authors
- Bozin, B., Mimica-Dukic, N., Samojlik, I., & Jovin, E.
- Venue
- Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2007-08-21
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 7879-7885
- ISSN
- 0021-8561 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5118
- OpenAlex
- W2040435198
- Cited by
- 762
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 27.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.