The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Content of Insoluble Bound Phenolics in Millets and Their Contribution to Antioxidant Capacity
Abstract
Soluble and insoluble-bound phenolic extracts of several varieties of millet (kodo, finger, foxtail, proso, pearl, and little millets) whole grains were evaluated for their phenolic contents and antioxidative efficacy using trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity (TEAC), reducing power (RP), and beta-carotene-linoleate model system as well as ferrous chelating activity. In addition, ferulic and p-coumaric acids were present in soluble and bound phenolic fractions of millets, and their contents were determined using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and HPLC-mass spectrometry (MS). Kodo millet had the highest total phenolic content, whereas proso millet possessed the least. All millet varieties showed high antioxidant activities, although the order of their efficacy was assay dependent. HPLC analysis of millet phenolic extracts demonstrated that the bound fractions contained more ferulic and p-coumaric acids compared to their soluble counterparts. The results of this study showed that soluble as well as bound fractions of millet grains are rich sources of phenolic compounds with antioxidant, metal chelating, and reducing power. The potential of whole millets as natural sources of antioxidants depends on the variety used. The importance of the insoluble bound fraction of millet as a source of ferulic acid and p-coumaric acid was established, and their contribution to the total phenolic content must be taken into account in the assessment of the antioxidant activity of millets.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Colorimetry of Total Phenolics with Phosphomolybdic-Phosphotungstic Acid Reagents
Singleton, V. L., & Rossi, J. A. (1965) · American Journal of Enology and Viticulture · doi:10.5344/ajev.1965.16.3.144 · Cited by 24,852
McKeown, N. M., Meigs, J. B., Liu, S., Wilson, P. W., & Jacques, P. F. (2002) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/76.2.390 · Cited by 574
Cited by
Shahidi, F., & Ambigaipalan, P. (2015) · Journal of Functional Foods · doi:10.1016/j.jff.2015.06.018 · Cited by 3,081
Chemistry and biochemistry of dietary polyphenols
Tsao, R. (2010) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu2121231 · Cited by 2,415
Chandrasekara, A., & Shahidi, F. (2012) · Journal of Functional Foods · doi:10.1016/j.jff.2011.11.001 · Cited by 334
Self-citationReview of Distribution, Extraction Methods, and Health Benefits of Bound Phenolics in Food Plants
Wang, Z., Li, S., Ge, S., & Lin, S. (2020) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.jafc.9b06574 · Cited by 269
Metadata
- Authors
- Chandrasekara, A., & Shahidi, F.
- Venue
- Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2010-05-13
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 6706-6714
- ISSN
- 0021-8561 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5118
- OpenAlex
- W1984543835
- Cited by
- 578
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.