Cited by 39Phytochemicals and Antioxidant ActivitiesLight effects on plantsPostharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

UV-Induced Changes of Active Components and Antioxidant Activity in Postharvest Pigeon Pea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.] Leaves

Wei, Zuo-Fu, Luo, Meng, Zhao, Chun-Jian, Li, Chun-Ying, Gu, Cheng-Bo, Wang, Wei, Zu, Yuan-Gang, Efferth, Thomas, Fu, Yu-Jie·2013·Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Abstract

In this study, the effect of UV irradiation (UV-A, UV-B, and UV-C) on phytochemicals, total phenolics, and antioxidant activity of postharvest pigeon pea leaves was evaluated. The response of pigeon pea leaves to UV irradiation was phytochemical specific. UV-B and UV-C induced higher levels of phytochemicals, total phenolics, and antioxidant activity in pigeon pea leaves compared with UV-A. Furthermore, UV-B irradiation proved to possess a long-lasting effect on the levels of phenolics and antioxidant activity. After adapting for 48 h at 4 °C following 4 h UV-B irradiation, total phenolics and antioxidant activity were approximately 1.5-fold and 2.2-fold increased from 39.4 mg GAE/g DM and 15.0 μmol GAE/g DM to 59.1 mg GAE/g DM and 32.5 μmol GAE/g DM, respectively. These results indicate that UV irradiation of pigeon pea leaves can be beneficial in terms of increasing active components and antioxidant activity.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jf304973f

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. Grover J. K., 2002, J. Ethnopharmacol., 81, 81, 10.1016/S0378-8741(02)00059-4 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Morton J. F., 1976, HortScience, 11, 11, 10.21273/HORTSCI.11.1.11 · DOI
  3. Wei Z. F., 2011, Chem. Eng. J., 172, 864, 10.1016/j.cej.2011.06.075 · DOI
  4. Ashidi J. S., 2010, J. Ethnopharmacol., 128, 501, 10.1016/j.jep.2010.01.009 · DOI
  5. Wu N., 2009, Molecules, 14, 1032, 10.3390/molecules14031032 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Wu N., 2011, Phytomedicine, 18, 110, 10.1016/j.phymed.2010.07.001 · DOI
  7. Duker-Eshun G., 2004, Phytother. Res., 18, 128, 10.1002/ptr.1375 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Chai T., 2005, Biol. Plantarum, 49, 153, 10.1007/s00000-005-3156-9 · DOI
  9. Miller G., 2007, Plant Physiol., 144, 1777, 10.1104/pp.107.101436 · DOI
  10. Pagano E. A, 2000, J. Exp. Bot., 51, 1299
  11. Zhang W. J., 2009, Fitoterapia, 80, 207, 10.1016/j.fitote.2009.02.006 · DOI
  12. Hashiba K., 2006, Biochem. Syst. Ecol., 34, 854, 10.1016/j.bse.2006.04.012 · DOI
  13. Liakoura V., 2001, Physiol. Plantarum, 111, 491, 10.1034/j.1399-3054.2001.1110409.x · DOI
  14. Lonchampt M., 1989, Arzneim.-Forsch., 39, 882
  15. Spitaler R., 2006, Phytochemistry, 67, 409, 10.1016/j.phytochem.2005.11.018 · DOI
  16. Wang C. Y., 2009, Food Chem., 117, 426, 10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.04.037 · DOI
  17. Eichholz I., 2011, Food Chem., 126, 60, 10.1016/j.foodchem.2010.10.071 · DOI
  18. Schreiner M., 2009, Innov. Food Sci. Emerg., 10, 93, 10.1016/j.ifset.2008.10.001 · DOI
  19. Zheng X. B., 2010, Acta Hortic. Sin., 37, 1227
  20. Hu Y. M., 2006, Chin. J. Nat. Med., 4, 420
  21. Shimomura H., 1988, Phytochemistry, 27, 3937, 10.1016/0031-9422(88)83049-8 · DOI
  22. Cuong N. M., 1996, Pharmazie, 51, 128
  23. Cooksey C. J., 1982, Phytochemistry, 21, 2935, 10.1016/0031-9422(80)85072-2 · DOI
  24. Green P. W., 2003, J. Chem. Ecol., 29, 811, 10.1023/A:1022971430463 · DOI
  25. Oktay M., 2003, Lebensm-Wiss. Technol., 36, 263, 10.1016/S0023-6438(02)00226-8 · DOI
  26. Antognoni F., 2007, Fitoterapia, 78, 345, 10.1016/j.fitote.2007.02.001 · DOI
  27. Pluskota W. E., 2005, Acta Physiol. Plant., 27, 229, 10.1007/s11738-005-0027-1 · DOI
  28. Tang K., 2010, J. Plant Physiol., 167, 95, 10.1016/j.jplph.2009.07.011 · DOI
  29. Saigne-Soulard C., 2006, Anal. Chim. Acta, 563, 137, 10.1016/j.aca.2005.09.073 · DOI
  30. Hagen S. F., 2007, Postharvest Biol. Technol., 45, 1, 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2007.02.002 · DOI
  31. Cantos E., 2002, J. Agric. Food Chem., 50, 6322, 10.1021/jf020562x · DOI
  32. Cisneros-Zevallos L., 2003, J. Food Sci., 68, 1560, 10.1111/j.1365-2621.2003.tb12291.x · DOI
  33. Cantos E., 2000, J. Agric. Food Chem., 48, 4606, 10.1021/jf0002948 · DOI
  34. Wang W., 2010, Plant Physiol. Biochem., 48, 142, 10.1016/j.plaphy.2009.12.002 · DOI
  35. Liswidowati F., 1991, Planta, 183, 307, 10.1007/BF00197803 · DOI
  36. Wiese W., 1994, Plant Mol. Biol., 26, 667, 10.1007/BF00013752 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Wei, Z.-F., Luo, M., Zhao, C.-J., Li, C.-Y., Gu, C.-B., Wang, W., Zu, Y.-G., Efferth, T., & Fu, Y.-J.
Affiliations
  • Northeast Forestry University (CN)
  • Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE)
Venue
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Published
2013-01-31
Volume
61
Issue
6
Pages
1165-1171
ISSN
  • 0021-8561 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5118
OpenAlex
W2047722791
Cited by
39
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3
FWCI
2.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry (medical) › Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Light effects on plants
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management
Keywords
Cajanus cajan, UV irradiation, UV-B radiation, UV-C, UVA, total phenolic content, antioxidant activity, phytochemicals, cold adaptation, shelf life extension
MeSH terms
Antioxidants, Phenols, Plant Extracts, Plant Leaves, Cajanus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review