Cited by 96Tea Polyphenols and EffectsProteins in Food SystemsDrug Solubulity and Delivery Systems

Fabrication of Self-Assembled (−)-Epigallocatechin Gallate (EGCG) Ovalbumin–Dextran Conjugate Nanoparticles and Their Transport across Monolayers of Human Intestinal Epithelial Caco-2 Cells

Li, Zheng, Gu, Liwei·2014·Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Abstract

Nanoparticles have the potential to increase bioavailability of nutraceutical compounds such as (-)-epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG). Ovalbumin was conjugated with dextran using the Maillard reaction. The resultant ovalbumin-dextran (O-D) conjugates were self-assembled with EGCG to form EGCG O-D conjugate nanoparticles at pH 5.2 after heating at 80 °C for 60 min. Ovalbumin in EGCG O-D conjugate nanoparticles was further cross-linked by glutaraldehyde for 24 h at room temperature. EGCG O-D conjugate nanoparticles and cross-linked EGCG O-D conjugate nanoparticles in aqueous suspension had particle sizes of 285 and 339 nm, respectively, and showed a spherical morphology. The loading efficiencies of EGCG in these two nanoparticles were 23.4 and 30.0%, whereas the loading capacities were 19.6 and 20.9%, respectively. These nanoparticles showed positive zeta-potentials in a pH range from 2.5 to 4.0 but had negative charges at pH ≥5.0. EGCG O-D conjugate nanoparticles maintained a particle size of 183-349 nm in simulated gastric fluid (SGF) and 188-291 nm in simulated intestinal fluid (SIF) at 37 °C for 2 h, whereas cross-linked nanoparticles had particle sizes of 294-527 nm in SGF and 206-300 nm in SIF. Limited release of EGCG was observed in both nanoparticle systems in simulated gastric and intestinal fluids without and with digestive enzymes. EGCG O-D conjugate nanoparticles significantly enhanced the apparent permeability coefficient (Papp) of EGCG on Caco-2 monolayers compared with EGCG solution, suggesting that these nanoparticles may improve the absorption of EGCG.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jf404621f

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, Z., & Gu, L.
Affiliations
University of Florida (US)
Corresponding author
Gu, Liwei
Venue
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Published
2014-01-28
Volume
62
Issue
6
Pages
1301-1309
ISSN
  • 0021-8561 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5118
OpenAlex
W3021595664
Cited by
96
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5
FWCI
6.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Tea Polyphenols and Effects
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Proteins in Food Systems
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Drug Solubulity and Delivery Systems
Keywords
epigallocatechin gallate, nanoparticle self-assembly, Maillard reaction, glutaraldehyde crosslinking, intestinal absorption, Caco-2 cell monolayers, simulated gastrointestinal fluids, drug release, apparent permeability coefficient, protein-polysaccharide conjugates
MeSH terms
Catechin, Dextrans, Digestion, Drug Stability, Glutaral, Humans, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Intestinal Absorption, Intestinal Mucosa, Ovalbumin, Particle Size, Maillard Reaction, Caco-2 Cells, Gastrointestinal Tract, Nanoparticles

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review