The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nanopesticides: Guiding Principles for Regulatory Evaluation of Environmental Risks
Open accessAbstract
Nanopesticides or nano plant protection products represent an emerging technological development that, in relation to pesticide use, could offer a range of benefits including increased efficacy, durability, and a reduction in the amounts of active ingredients that need to be used. A number of formulation types have been suggested including emulsions (e.g., nanoemulsions), nanocapsules (e.g., with polymers), and products containing pristine engineered nanoparticles, such as metals, metal oxides, and nanoclays. The increasing interest in the use of nanopesticides raises questions as to how to assess the environmental risk of these materials for regulatory purposes. Here, the current approaches for environmental risk assessment of pesticides are reviewed and the question of whether these approaches are fit for purpose for use on nanopesticides is addressed. Potential adaptations to existing environmental risk assessment tests and procedures for use with nanopesticides are discussed, addressing aspects such as analysis and characterization, environmental fate and exposure assessment, uptake by biota, ecotoxicity, and risk assessment of nanopesticides in aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. Throughout, the main focus is on assessing whether the presence of the nanoformulation introduces potential differences relative to the conventional active ingredients. The proposed changes in the test methodology, research priorities, and recommendations would facilitate the development of regulatory approaches and a regulatory framework for nanopesticides.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Deposition and biokinetics of inhaled nanoparticles
Geiser, M., & Kreyling, W. G. (2010) · Particle and Fibre Toxicology · doi:10.1186/1743-8977-7-2 · Cited by 747
von der Kammer, F., Ferguson, P. L., Holden, P. A., Masion, A., Rogers, K. R., Klaine, S. J., Koelmans, A. A., Horne, N., & Unrine, J. M. (2012) · Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry · doi:10.1002/etc.723 · Cited by 448
Manufactured nanoparticles: their uptake and effects on fish—a mechanistic analysis
Handy, R. D., Henry, T. B., Scown, T. M., Johnston, B. D., & Tyler, C. R. (2008) · Ecotoxicology · doi:10.1007/s10646-008-0205-1 · Cited by 447
Cited by
Nano-enabled pesticides for sustainable agriculture and global food security
Wang, D., Saleh, N. B., Byro, A., Zepp, R., Sahle-Demessie, E., Luxton, T. P., Ho, K. T., Burgess, R. M., Flury, M., White, J. C., et al. (2022) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41565-022-01082-8 · Cited by 877
Kim, D., Kadam, A., Shinde, S., Saratale, R. G., Patra, J., & Ghodake, G. (2018) · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture · doi:10.1002/jsfa.8749 · Cited by 312
Yan, S., Ren, B., & Shen, J. (2021) · Insect Science · doi:10.1111/1744-7917.12822 · Cited by 303
Modeling Nanomaterial Environmental Fate in Aquatic Systems
Dale, A. L., Casman, E. A., Lowry, G. V., Lead, J. R., Viparelli, E., & Baalousha, M. (2015) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es505076w · Cited by 286
Karimi-Maleh, H., Ghalkhani, M., Saberi Dehkordi, Z., Mohsenpour Tehran, M., Singh, J., Wen, Y., Baghayeri, M., Rouhi, J., Fu, L., & Rajendran, S. (2024) · Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.jiec.2023.08.044 · Cited by 130
Metadata
- Authors
- Kookana, R. S., Boxall, A. B. A., Reeves, P. T., Ashauer, R., Beulke, S., Chaudhry, Q., Cornelis, G., Fernandes, T. F., Gan, J., Kah, M., Lynch, I., Ranville, J., Sinclair, C., Spurgeon, D., Tiede, K., & Van den Brink, P. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2014-04-30
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 4227-4240
- ISSN
- 0021-8561 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5118
- OpenAlex
- W1974452760
- Cited by
- 478
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 10.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.