Cited by 20Genetically Modified Organisms ResearchAnimal Genetics and ReproductionAgricultural safety and regulations

Persistence of plant DNA sequences in the blood of dairy cows fed with genetically modified (Bt176) and conventional corn silage

Bertheau, Y., Helbling, J. C., Fortabat, M. N., Makhzami, S., Sotinel, I., Audéon, C., Nignol, A. C., Kobilinsky, A. +5 more·2009·Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Abstract

To determine whether plant sequences, including transgenic sequences, are present in animal blood, we tested blood samples from Holstein cows fed with either Bt176 genetically modified corn or conventional corn. We used previously described sensitive real-time PCR assays targeting transgenic sequences (35S promoter and Bt176 specific junction sequence), a monocopy maize-specific sequence (ADH promoter), and two multicopy sequences from plant nucleus (26S rRNA gene) and chloroplast (psaB gene). The presence of Cry1A(b) protein in bovine blood samples was also tested using a sandwich ELISA kit. Our study shows the ability of plant nuclear and/or chloroplast DNA fragments to enter bovine blood circulation. However, maize nuclear DNA, both mono- and multicopy sequences, was less detected than chloroplast DNA, probably because the higher number of chloroplast copies and also possibly because nuclear DNA might be less protected by the nuclear membrane. Despite our data confirm the ability of small (ca.150 bp) plant DNA fragments to cross the intestinal barrier, we were unable to demonstrate clearly the presence of transgenic DNA or proteins in bovine blood. No sample tested positive with the two real-time PCR assays targeting transgenic sequences (35S promoter and Bt176 specific junction sequence). Only faint punctual positive results occurred randomly and were probably due to postsample collection or laboratory contamination or can be considered as artifact as they have never been confirmed. Our data highlight the difficulties to detect transgenic sequences in blood of dairy cows fed genetically modified corn (Bt176) silage. Those results show that in order to meet the consumers' demand of animals fed with GM products there is currently no cost-effective analytical procedure to replace documentary traceability.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jf802262c

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Given that there are no detectable and reliably quantifiable traces of GE materials in milk, meat, and eggs, any proposed labeling of animal products derived from GE-fed livestock would have to be based on documenting the absence of GE crops in the production chain.

    “Given that there are no detectable and reliably quantifiable traces of GE materials in milk, meat, and eggs, any proposed labeling of animal products derived from GE-fed livestock would have to be based on documenting the absence of GE crops in the production chain, thereby necessitating the need for identity preservation and segregation requirements for producers and importers (Bertheau et al., 2”

    From Prevalence and impacts of genetically engineered feedstuffs on livestock populations1 (2014) · cites this paper as Bertheau et al., 2009

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bertheau, Y., Helbling, J. C., Fortabat, M. N., Makhzami, S., Sotinel, I., Audéon, C., Nignol, A. C., Kobilinsky, A., Petit, L., Fach, P., Brunschwig, P., Duhem, K., & Martin, P.
Affiliations
Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR)
Corresponding author
  • Bertheau, Y.
  • Martin, P.
Venue
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Published
2009-01-05
Volume
57
Issue
2
Pages
509-516
ISSN
  • 0021-8561 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5118
OpenAlex
W2089932647
Cited by
20
References
32
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetically Modified Organisms Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Animal Genetics and Reproduction
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Agricultural safety and regulations
Keywords
transgenic maize, dairy cattle, blood, corn silage, chloroplast DNA, 26S rDNA, transgene persistence, intestinal barrier, GMO traceability, Holstein cows
MeSH terms
Animals, Cattle, Zea mays, Female, Plant Proteins, Silage, DNA, Plant, Plants, Genetically Modified

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review