Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 479

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Amino Acid Composition and Antioxidant Properties of Pea Seed (Pisum sativum L.) Enzymatic Protein Hydrolysate Fractions

Pownall, Trisha L., Udenigwe, Chibuike C., Aluko, Rotimi E.·2010·Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Abstract

The amino acid composition and antioxidant activities of peptide fractions obtained from HPLC separation of a pea protein hydrolysate (PPH) were studied. Thermolysin hydrolysis of pea protein isolate and ultrafiltration (3 kDa molecular weight cutoff membrane) yielded a PPH that was separated into five fractions (F1-F5) on a C(18) reverse phase HPLC column. The fractions that eluted later from the column (F3-F5) contained higher contents hydrophobic and aromatic amino acids when compared to fractions that eluted early or the original PPH. Fractions F3-F5 also exhibited the strongest radical scavenging and metal chelating activities; however, hydrophobic character did not seem to contribute to reducing power of the peptides. In comparison to glutathione, the peptide fractions had significantly higher (p < 0.05) ability to inhibit linoleic acid oxidation and chelate metals. In contrast, glutathione had significantly higher (p < 0.05) free radical scavenging properties than the peptide fractions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jf904456r

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 33

  1. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada. Bi-weekly bulletin − dry peas: situation and outlook;http://www.manitobapulse.ca/pdf/market_report-DryPeasBulletin.pdf, viewed Aug 1, 2009.
  2. Iqbal A., 2006, Food Chem., 97, 331, 10.1016/j.foodchem.2005.05.011 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Wang T. L., 2003, Plant Physiol., 131, 886, 10.1104/pp.102.017665 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Aluko R. E., 2008, J. AOAC Int., 91, 947, 10.1093/jaoac/91.4.947 · DOI
  5. Korhonen H., 2003, Curr. Pharm. Des., 9, 1297, 10.2174/1381612033454892 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Je J.-Y., 2008, J. Med. Food, 11, 629, 10.1089/jmf.2007.0114 · DOI
  7. Li Y., 2008, Food Chem., 106, 444, 10.1016/j.foodchem.2007.04.067 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Bidlingmeyer B., 1984, J. Chromatogr., 336, 93, 10.1016/S0378-4347(00)85133-6 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Gehrke C., 1985, J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem., 68, 811
  10. Landry J., 1992, J. Agric. Food Chem., 40, 776, 10.1021/jf00017a014 · DOI
  11. Aluko R. E., 2003, J. Food Sci., 68, 1254, 10.1111/j.1365-2621.2003.tb09635.x · DOI · Paper page
  12. Zhang S. B., 2008, J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc., 85, 521, 10.1007/s11746-008-1217-y · DOI
  13. Theodore A. E., 2008, J. Agric. Food Chem., 56, 7459, 10.1021/jf800185f · DOI
  14. Udenigwe C. C., 2009, Food Chem., 116, 277, 10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.02.046 · DOI
  15. Guo H., 2009, Food Chem., 113, 238, 10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.06.081 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Xie Z., 2008, Food Chem., 111, 370, 10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.03.078 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Antonczak S., 2000, J. Mol. Model., 6, 527, 10.1007/s0089400060527 · doi:10.1007/s0089400060527
  18. Aluko R. E., 2004, Proteins in Food Processing, 323, 10.1533/9781855738379.2.323 · DOI
  19. Bougatef A., 2009, Food Chem., 114, 1198, 10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.10.075 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Prior R. L., 2005, J. Agric. Food Chem., 53, 4290, 10.1021/jf0502698 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Liu Y.-W., 2003, J. Agric. Food Chem., 51, 4389, 10.1021/jf030016j · doi:10.1021/jf030016j
  22. Humiski L. M., 2007, J. Food Sci., 72, S605, 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2007.00475.x · DOI
  23. Tang C. H., 2009, Food Chem., 115, 672, 10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.12.068 · DOI
  24. Yan X., 1999, J. Agric. Food Chem., 47, 4711, 10.1021/jf981305o · DOI
  25. Li M., 2003, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 312, 316, 10.1016/j.bbrc.2003.10.116 · DOI
  26. Dong S., 2008, Food Chem., 107, 1485, 10.1016/j.foodchem.2007.10.011 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Megias C., 2008, LWT−Food Sci. Technol., 41, 1973
  28. Li B., 2007, Food Chem., 102, 1135, 10.1016/j.foodchem.2006.07.002 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Chang C., 2007, Food Chem., 100, 1537, 10.1016/j.foodchem.2005.12.019 · DOI
  30. Zhang S. B., 2007, J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc., 84, 693, 10.1007/s11746-007-1080-2 · DOI
  31. You L., 2009, Innovative Food Sci. Emerg. Technol., 10, 235, 10.1016/j.ifset.2008.08.007 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Jayaprakasha G. K., 2001, Food Chem., 73, 285, 10.1016/S0308-8146(00)00298-3 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Chen G., 2007, J. Sci. Food Agric., 87, 357, 10.1002/jsfa.2744 · DOI

Cited by

See all 479

Metadata

Authors
Pownall, T. L., Udenigwe, C. C., & Aluko, R. E.
Venue
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Published
2010-04-01
Volume
58
Issue
8
Pages
4712-4718
ISSN
  • 0021-8561 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5118
OpenAlex
W1977114185
Cited by
479
References
3
FWCI
6.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.